SHOULD CAPITAL PUNISHMENT BE ABOLISHED?
Should Capital Punishment Be Abolished?
Introduction
Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is the legal process where a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a crime. It has been a subject of intense debate globally, centered on moral, legal, social, and practical grounds.
Arguments in Favor of Abolishing Capital Punishment
1. Right to Life and Human Dignity
Capital punishment violates the fundamental right to life, which is enshrined in many constitutions and international human rights documents. Taking a life as a form of punishment is seen as an irreversible violation of human dignity.
Case Law:
Mithu v. State of Punjab (1983) — The Supreme Court of India held that the death penalty cannot be imposed for the crime of murder committed by a minor. The judgment emphasized the sanctity of life and the principle that the death penalty must be applied with the utmost caution.
2. Possibility of Judicial Errors
The criminal justice system is fallible, and wrongful convictions can lead to innocent people being executed, which is an irreversible miscarriage of justice.
Case Law:
Berghuis v. Thompkins (2010, U.S. Supreme Court) — While not directly about the death penalty, it underscored concerns about due process and safeguarding individuals' rights in the criminal justice system. The risk of error in capital cases is a major argument against the death penalty.
3. Lack of Deterrence
There is no conclusive evidence that capital punishment effectively deters crime more than life imprisonment or other severe punishments.
Case Law:
Gregg v. Georgia (1976) — The U.S. Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty but acknowledged that it should not be used arbitrarily or capriciously. However, studies post-Gregg have often found that the death penalty does not significantly deter crime more than other punishments.
4. Discriminatory Application
Capital punishment is often applied disproportionately against marginalized, poor, or minority groups, raising questions of fairness and equality under the law.
Case Law:
Furman v. Georgia (1972) — The U.S. Supreme Court ruled the death penalty unconstitutional in its then-current application due to arbitrary and discriminatory application, emphasizing the need for fairness and consistency.
5. Possibility of Reform
The justice system should focus on reformation and rehabilitation rather than retribution. Life imprisonment without parole can protect society without ending a human life.
Arguments Against Abolishing Capital Punishment
1. Retributive Justice
Capital punishment is seen as just retribution for the most heinous crimes, such as murder or terrorism. It reflects society's moral outrage and demands for justice.
Case Law:
Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980) — The Supreme Court of India upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty but stated that it should only be imposed in the “rarest of rare” cases, recognizing the principle of proportionality and retributive justice.
2. Protection of Society
Executing dangerous criminals permanently removes the risk of re-offending and protects society.
Case Law:
State of Rajasthan v. Balchand (1977) — The Supreme Court supported the use of the death penalty as a means of protecting society from heinous offenders.
3. Closure for Victims' Families
For some victims' families, the death penalty provides a sense of closure and justice served.
Balancing the Debate: "Rarest of Rare" Doctrine
Many judicial systems that retain the death penalty restrict its use to exceptional cases.
Case Law:
Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980) — The Supreme Court of India formulated the “rarest of rare” doctrine, meaning the death penalty should only be applied in exceptional circumstances where the alternative option is unquestionably foreclosed.
Conclusion
Should Capital Punishment Be Abolished?
The answer depends on weighing the principles of justice, human rights, deterrence, and societal protection. While capital punishment might serve as retributive justice in rare cases, the risks of wrongful execution, discriminatory application, and failure to conclusively deter crime present strong reasons for abolition.
Most modern judicial systems emphasize caution, limiting death sentences to the “rarest of rare” cases, or have abolished the practice entirely in favor of life imprisonment.
RELATED Blog
0 comments