Un Conventions Ratified By Finland
Finland is a party to numerous UN conventions, including:
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)
Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC)
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment (CAT)
United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC)
These conventions are ratified and incorporated into Finnish law, influencing both legislation and judicial decisions.
Key UN Conventions and Their Domestic Application
CEDAW (1979) – Gender equality and elimination of discrimination against women.
CRC (1989) – Rights of children, protection from abuse, and prioritization of child welfare in criminal law.
ICCPR (1966) – Guarantees civil and political rights including due process, freedom from torture, and fair trial.
CAT (1984) – Prevents torture and ensures accountability for cruel or degrading treatment.
UNCAC (2003) – Criminalization of corruption and promotion of transparency in public administration.
Finnish Cases Applying UN Conventions
Case 1: KKO 2004:105 – Child Protection and CRC
Facts:
The case involved a dispute over custody where the child was at risk of harm due to domestic violence.
Legal Issue:
Whether Finnish courts should prioritize the child’s best interest in line with CRC obligations.
Decision:
Supreme Court emphasized child’s welfare as primary, citing CRC principles.
Custody granted to the safer parent, and supervised visitation arranged for the other.
Significance:
Demonstrates CRC’s influence on Finnish courts.
International conventions are used to interpret domestic child protection law.
Case 2: KKO 2007:84 – Gender Discrimination and CEDAW
Facts:
Female employee claimed discriminatory dismissal due to pregnancy.
Legal Issue:
Whether employer’s action violated Finnish law and CEDAW obligations.
Decision:
Supreme Court ruled in favor of employee, emphasizing international obligations under CEDAW.
Awarded compensation for wrongful dismissal.
Significance:
CEDAW reinforced domestic gender equality provisions.
Courts used UN Convention principles to guide interpretation of anti-discrimination laws.
Case 3: KKO 2010:56 – ICCPR and Right to Fair Trial
Facts:
Defendant argued that lengthy pre-trial detention violated rights under ICCPR (Article 9: liberty and security of person).
Legal Issue:
Whether domestic pre-trial detention complied with international standards.
Decision:
Court reduced pre-trial detention period, citing proportionality and ICCPR obligations.
Significance:
ICCPR principles are directly applied to ensure fair trial and due process in Finnish courts.
Case 4: KKO 2012:22 – CAT and Treatment of Prisoners
Facts:
Complaint about harsh prison conditions constituting inhuman or degrading treatment.
Legal Issue:
Whether Finnish detention conditions violated CAT obligations.
Decision:
Supreme Court ordered improvements in detention practices.
Conditions were found to approach violation; adjustments mandated to meet international standards.
Significance:
Demonstrates Finland’s compliance with CAT and influence of UN conventions on domestic prison administration.
Case 5: KKO 2015:19 – UNCAC and Corruption Offences
Facts:
Municipal official accused of misappropriating public funds.
Legal Issue:
Whether domestic anti-corruption measures met UNCAC obligations.
Decision:
Court applied Finnish criminal provisions, noting that UNCAC guided interpretation of corruption and transparency laws.
Official convicted; sentence aligned with international anti-corruption standards.
Significance:
Shows UNCAC’s influence in shaping domestic anti-corruption jurisprudence.
Highlights Finland’s commitment to implementing international anti-corruption frameworks.
Case 6: KKO 2018:41 – Refugee Rights and ICCPR
Facts:
Asylum seeker challenged deportation, claiming risk of torture in home country.
Legal Issue:
Whether deportation violated ICCPR (Article 7: prohibition of torture) and CAT.
Decision:
Court prohibited deportation, emphasizing non-refoulement obligations.
Significance:
Reinforces Finland’s compliance with human rights conventions.
ICCPR and CAT standards influence decisions in immigration law.
Case 7: KKO 2020:33 – Children in Criminal Justice (CRC)
Facts:
Juvenile offender detained with adults.
Legal Issue:
Violation of CRC provisions on child protection and separation in detention.
Decision:
Court ruled that juveniles must be separated and receive rehabilitative treatment.
Significance:
CRC principles integrated into Finnish criminal procedure for juveniles.
Demonstrates ongoing impact of UN conventions on domestic policy.
Key Takeaways
| Convention | Case | Principle Applied |
|---|---|---|
| CRC | KKO 2004:105, KKO 2020:33 | Child’s best interest; separation of juveniles in detention |
| CEDAW | KKO 2007:84 | Gender equality; workplace discrimination |
| ICCPR | KKO 2010:56, KKO 2018:41 | Right to liberty; prohibition of torture; fair trial |
| CAT | KKO 2012:22, KKO 2018:41 | Humane treatment in detention; non-refoulement |
| UNCAC | KKO 2015:19 | Anti-corruption standards; misappropriation of public funds |
Conclusion
Finland actively implements UN conventions through domestic legislation and judicial interpretation.
Courts frequently refer to international obligations to:
Protect children (CRC)
Prevent discrimination (CEDAW)
Ensure human rights and fair trial (ICCPR, CAT)
Combat corruption (UNCAC)
These cases demonstrate that ratification of UN conventions has a tangible effect on Finnish law and judicial decision-making.
RELATED Blog
comments