Whistleblower Retaliation Prosecutions
1. Overview of Whistleblower Retaliation Prosecutions
Whistleblower retaliation occurs when an employee suffers adverse actions for reporting illegal, unsafe, or unethical practices. These protections exist under both federal and state laws.
Key Federal Laws Include:
Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002 – Protects employees of publicly traded companies who report fraud.
Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 – Provides financial incentives and anti-retaliation protections for reporting securities law violations to the SEC.
False Claims Act (FCA) – Protects whistleblowers (“relators”) who report fraud against the government.
Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) – Protects employees reporting workplace safety violations.
Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) – Protects federal employees who disclose government misconduct.
Typical Retaliation: termination, demotion, harassment, salary reduction, or blacklisting.
2. Case Law Examples
Case 1: Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53 (2006)
Facts:
Sheila White was a female employee who reported sexual harassment by a supervisor.
After her complaint, she was reassigned to a less desirable job and suspended without pay.
Legal Issue:
What constitutes retaliation under Title VII?
Holding:
The Supreme Court held that retaliation is actionable if it could dissuade a reasonable worker from making a complaint.
The Court emphasized that retaliation need not be limited to actions affecting pay or promotion—it includes any materially adverse actions.
Significance:
Broadens protection for whistleblowers and establishes a “reasonable worker” standard.
Even non-termination actions can be retaliation.
Case 2: Dodd-Frank Act Whistleblower Case: SEC v. Freehling, 2016
Facts:
An employee reported accounting irregularities at a financial firm to the SEC.
The employee was demoted and ultimately fired.
Legal Issue:
Are whistleblowers protected under Dodd-Frank when reporting to a federal agency?
Holding:
The court reaffirmed that Dodd-Frank’s anti-retaliation provisions protect employees who report internally or to the SEC, not just publicly.
Employees could recover reinstatement, back pay, and other remedies.
Significance:
Reinforces the federal protection for whistleblowers in securities law.
Highlights the importance of documenting retaliation.
Case 3: Hughes v. Bed Bath & Beyond, 2009 (FCA Retaliation)
Facts:
Plaintiff reported fraudulent Medicare billing practices.
The company terminated her employment shortly after.
Legal Issue:
Does the False Claims Act protect employees who report fraud?
Holding:
The court ruled in favor of the employee, noting that any adverse employment action in response to whistleblowing under the FCA is illegal.
Significance:
Shows the FCA’s broad anti-retaliation protection.
Reinforces the legal remedies available to whistleblowers.
Case 4: Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp., 2011
Facts:
Michael Kasten complained about labor law violations regarding employee timekeeping.
He reported violations orally to his supervisor, which eventually led to his termination.
Legal Issue:
Do oral complaints qualify for protection under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)?
Holding:
The Supreme Court held that oral complaints about labor violations are protected under anti-retaliation provisions.
Significance:
Expands the definition of “protected activity” to include oral reporting, not just written.
Reinforces protections for whistleblowers in workplace law.
Case 5: Garcia v. Florida Department of Corrections, 2010
Facts:
Correctional officer reported unsafe staffing conditions that endangered inmates and staff.
He was subsequently demoted.
Legal Issue:
Does state-level whistleblower protection cover safety complaints?
Holding:
The court held that state whistleblower statutes protect employees reporting threats to public safety, and demotion constituted unlawful retaliation.
Significance:
Demonstrates that retaliation law is not limited to federal employees or corporate whistleblowers.
Highlights protection for public-sector employees exposing dangers to the public.
Case 6: Allen v. Admin Review Board, 2013 (OSHA Whistleblower Case)
Facts:
Employee at a construction company reported OSHA violations.
Employer retaliated by reducing his hours and transferring him to a less favorable location.
Legal Issue:
What constitutes retaliation under OSHA?
Holding:
The Administrative Review Board ruled that any adverse employment action linked to protected reporting is retaliatory, even subtle or non-financial penalties.
Significance:
Confirms OSHA’s broad anti-retaliation protections.
Shows that retaliation need not be overt termination to be actionable.
3. Key Takeaways from These Cases
Protected Activity is Broad: Written or oral complaints, internal or external reports, and even raising safety concerns can be protected.
Retaliation is Broad: Not just termination; demotions, reduced hours, job reassignment, harassment, or even subtle penalties qualify.
Legal Remedies Include: Reinstatement, back pay, compensatory damages, and sometimes punitive damages.
Reasonable Worker Standard: The Supreme Court emphasizes evaluating retaliation from the perspective of a reasonable employee, not just the whistleblower personally.
Documentation is Critical: Courts frequently emphasize evidence of a causal link between the whistleblowing and the adverse action.
RELATED Blog
comments