Workplace Harassment, Bullying, And Retaliation Under Criminal Law
1. Faragher v. City of Boca Raton (1998, U.S. Supreme Court)
Facts: Beth Ann Faragher, a lifeguard, sued her employer, the City of Boca Raton, for sexual harassment by her supervisors. She alleged repeated offensive comments, unwanted touching, and a hostile work environment. She also claimed that when she reported the harassment, the city failed to take remedial action.
Legal Issues:
Can an employer be held liable for sexual harassment by a supervisor?
How does a hostile work environment affect liability?
Court Reasoning: The Supreme Court held that an employer can be vicariously liable for harassment by supervisors if it results in a hostile work environment. The Court also introduced the “Faragher-Ellerth defense,” where employers can avoid liability if they had preventive policies in place and the employee failed to use complaint procedures.
Significance: Set a major precedent for employer liability in workplace harassment and emphasized the importance of complaint mechanisms.
2. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White (2006, U.S. Supreme Court)
Facts: Sheila White, an employee, was reassigned to less favorable duties and suspended without pay after filing a sexual harassment complaint. She alleged retaliation for complaining about workplace harassment.
Legal Issues: Does retaliation for filing a harassment complaint violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act?
Court Reasoning: The Supreme Court ruled that retaliation claims cover any employer action that would dissuade a reasonable employee from making a complaint, not just actions related to hiring or firing.
Significance: Expanded protections against retaliation, showing that bullying or punitive work reassignment following complaints can constitute unlawful retaliation.
3. Mohindra v. State of Haryana (India, Punjab & Haryana High Court, 2018)
Facts: A female government employee filed a complaint against her superior for persistent bullying, abusive language, and humiliating treatment at work. She alleged that repeated complaints were ignored, leading to mental distress.
Legal Issues: Can workplace harassment and bullying by a superior be considered actionable under criminal law (Section 354A & 509 IPC)?
Court Reasoning: The High Court held that persistent bullying, humiliation, and sexual harassment can constitute criminal harassment under IPC, especially when it impacts the dignity of the employee. The Court emphasized employer accountability under the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013.
Significance: Reinforced that workplace harassment in India is both a criminal and civil issue, giving courts the authority to act even when formal HR measures fail.
4. Robinson v. Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc. (2009, U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit)
Facts: An employee claimed repeated racial bullying, including offensive jokes, threats, and public humiliation by supervisors. The employee complained to HR, which failed to resolve the issue, and subsequently the employee was terminated.
Legal Issues: Does failure to address workplace bullying and harassment constitute actionable discrimination and retaliation?
Court Reasoning: The Court held that a hostile work environment due to harassment is actionable if the employer knew or should have known and failed to take corrective measures. Termination following complaints also constitutes unlawful retaliation.
Significance: Highlighted that courts recognize bullying and harassment as serious workplace misconduct with both civil and potential criminal implications.
5. Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (India, Supreme Court, 1997)
Facts: A social worker was gang-raped by her employer. There was no statutory law at the time to protect women from sexual harassment at the workplace.
Legal Issues: Can courts create guidelines to prevent sexual harassment in the absence of explicit statutory law?
Court Reasoning: The Supreme Court laid down the Vishaka Guidelines, which defined sexual harassment broadly, including physical, verbal, and psychological abuse. It mandated employers to establish complaint committees.
Significance: Became the foundation for the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013, explicitly criminalizing harassment, bullying, and retaliation.
6. EEOC v. Mitsubishi Motors North America (1998, U.S. District Court)
Facts: Female employees alleged pervasive sexual harassment and a hostile work environment at Mitsubishi, including repeated bullying, threats, and retaliation when complaints were made.
Legal Issues: Can systemic workplace bullying and retaliation be actionable under Title VII?
Court Reasoning: The court ruled that systemic harassment creating a hostile work environment violates federal law. Employers must maintain internal grievance procedures and are liable if they fail to act.
Significance: Emphasized corporate accountability and showed that repeated bullying, even without physical assault, can be grounds for legal action.
Key Themes Across Cases
Employer liability is central: Courts consistently hold that employers are responsible if harassment or bullying is ignored.
Retaliation is unlawful: Punitive measures against complainants are treated as serious offenses.
Criminal and civil overlap: In India, IPC sections (354A, 509) and workplace harassment laws provide criminal remedies alongside civil protections.
Psychological and verbal abuse count: Harassment is not limited to sexual assault; bullying, humiliation, and intimidation can constitute actionable offenses.
Preventive policies matter: Faragher and Mitsubishi cases emphasize internal grievance mechanisms to avoid liability.
RELATED Blog
comments