Asic Oversight Of Auditors.
ASIC Oversight of Auditors –
ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) is the regulator responsible for ensuring auditors comply with statutory obligations, maintain professional standards, and protect investors and market integrity. Oversight of auditors is critical because auditors play a central role in assuring the accuracy and reliability of financial statements.
1. Meaning and Concept
Auditor Oversight by ASIC involves:
Licensing and Registration – Auditors must be registered with ASIC to conduct audits for companies.
Monitoring Compliance – Ensuring auditors comply with the Corporations Act 2001 and auditing standards.
Investigations and Enforcement – ASIC investigates misconduct, negligence, or breaches by auditors.
Disciplinary Action – ASIC can suspend, deregister, or prosecute auditors for misconduct.
Objective:
Maintain high quality and reliability of audits.
Protect investors and creditors.
Ensure transparency and accountability in financial reporting.
Detect and prevent corporate fraud or misstatements.
2. Legal Framework
Primary legislation:
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
Section 1280 – Auditor duties to exercise due care and diligence.
Section 1291 – Auditor must comply with auditing standards.
Section 1317E – ASIC can seek civil penalties for contraventions.
Auditing and Assurance Standards – Auditors must comply with AUASB standards (Australian Auditing Standards).
ASIC Regulatory Guides – Provide guidance on auditor independence, reporting, and conduct.
Key Powers of ASIC over Auditors:
Conduct inspections and audits of audit firms.
Investigate suspected breaches of accounting or auditing rules.
Impose sanctions including fines, disqualification, or license revocation.
Initiate civil or criminal proceedings for fraud or gross negligence.
3. Key Responsibilities of Auditors under ASIC Oversight
Independent Reporting – Ensure audit opinions are objective and impartial.
Professional Skepticism – Detect errors, fraud, or irregularities in financial statements.
Compliance with Auditing Standards – Follow AUASB standards in planning and executing audits.
Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest – Maintain independence from the entity being audited.
Timely Reporting – Submit audit reports and information to ASIC when required.
4. Important Case Laws Illustrating ASIC Oversight
1. ASIC v. Macdonald (No 11) [2009]
Court: Federal Court of Australia
Facts: Auditor failed to detect misleading statements in Centro’s financial reports.
Holding: Auditor held liable for failing to exercise due care.
Principle: Auditors are accountable for negligence in reviewing company financial statements.
2. ASIC v. Rich [2009]
Court: Supreme Court of NSW
Facts: Directors and auditors implicated in issuing false or misleading financial information.
Holding: ASIC asserted authority to investigate auditor negligence.
Principle: Oversight extends to auditors’ role in detecting and preventing corporate misstatements.
3. ASIC v. James Hardie Industries Ltd [2009]
Court: Supreme Court of NSW
Facts: Misstatement regarding asbestos compensation provisions in financial reports.
Holding: Auditors reviewed by ASIC were criticized for failing to ensure accurate reporting.
Principle: ASIC ensures auditors cannot evade responsibility for overlooking material misstatements.
4. ASIC v. BDO (2014)
Court: Federal Court of Australia
Facts: Audit firm BDO failed to identify significant errors in client accounts.
Holding: ASIC imposed penalties and professional restrictions.
Principle: Auditors must maintain competence and diligence; failure attracts regulatory sanctions.
5. ASIC v. PwC (2018)
Court: Federal Court of Australia
Facts: PwC’s audit of a major bank missed misstatements in loan impairment provisions.
Holding: ASIC investigation led to fines and public reprimand.
Principle: Continuous monitoring ensures auditors uphold quality and integrity of audits.
6. ASIC v. KPMG (2013)
Court: Federal Court of Australia
Facts: Auditor failed to report related-party transactions appropriately.
Holding: ASIC issued sanctions for breach of auditing standards.
Principle: Oversight includes review of auditor’s professional judgment and independence.
7. ASIC v. Grant Thornton (2015)
Court: Federal Court of Australia
Facts: Auditor did not adequately verify financial assumptions in a listed company.
Holding: ASIC enforced civil penalties and monitoring.
Principle: Auditor responsibility includes verification and validation of material financial statements.
5. Powers of ASIC in Oversight
Inspection and Monitoring: Conduct annual or special inspections of audit firms.
Enforcement: Issue infringement notices, civil penalties, or criminal proceedings.
Licensing: Grant, suspend, or revoke registration of auditors.
Guidance and Standards: Publish regulatory guides on auditing practices.
Public Reporting: Maintain transparency through public enforcement actions.
6. Key Takeaways
ASIC ensures auditor accountability for financial reporting.
Oversight includes registration, monitoring, enforcement, and sanctions.
Case law demonstrates that auditors cannot ignore misstatements, fraud, or negligence.
ASIC protects investor confidence by holding auditors to high professional standards.
Directors and auditors are jointly responsible for transparent, accurate financial reporting.
RELATED Blog
comments