Din Verification Obligations.
DIN Verification Obligations
1. Introduction to DIN
A Director Identification Number (DIN) is a unique identification number allotted to an individual who is appointed as a director of a company under the Companies Act, 2013. The DIN system ensures that every director can be tracked across companies and serves to prevent fraudulent practices by directors.
Statutory provisions:
Section 152 of the Companies Act, 2013 mandates the appointment of directors and requires that every director must obtain a DIN.
Rule 9 of the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014 provides procedural aspects for obtaining DIN.
2. Verification Obligations of DIN
The DIN verification obligations are duties imposed on various stakeholders to ensure that the DIN is valid, correctly issued, and not misused. These obligations include:
Verification by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA):
The MCA is responsible for issuing DINs after verification of personal details such as PAN, Aadhaar, passport, or other identification documents.
MCA maintains the DIN database, which must be updated for any change in particulars of the director.
Obligation of Companies:
Companies must ensure that any person proposed for appointment as a director possesses a valid DIN.
Forms like DIR-3, DIR-12 require the DIN to be verified before appointment or resignation.
Filing false or invalid DIN information is punishable under Section 449 (penalty for false statements) of the Companies Act.
Obligation of Directors:
Directors must ensure the accuracy of information submitted for obtaining DIN.
They must notify the company of any changes in personal particulars (e.g., address, name) as per Rule 12 of the Companies (Appointment and Qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014.
Verification in Transactions and Resolutions:
Companies must verify DIN before board resolutions, annual filings, or compliance documents.
Auditors and regulators can reject filings if DIN verification is incomplete or incorrect.
Cross-checking by Professionals:
Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and other professionals assisting in incorporation or compliance must verify the authenticity of the DIN.
3. Legal Implications of Non-Verification
Failure to verify DIN properly can lead to:
Penalties under Section 450 & 449 of the Companies Act (fine or imprisonment for false filing).
Invalidity of appointment of directors.
Risk of fraudulent transactions and personal liability of directors.
4. Relevant Case Laws
In Re: Vinod Kumar Agarwal
Facts: A director submitted multiple DINs, some of which were fraudulent.
Holding: MCA has the power to cancel fraudulent DINs; directors must provide authentic documents.
Significance: Reinforces the need for proper verification of DIN before appointment.
Re: Manohar Lal Sharma vs MCA & Ors. (2018)
Facts: Issue regarding appointment of directors with incorrect DIN information.
Holding: Court held that the MCA’s verification system is binding, and false DIN submissions attract penalties.
Significance: Companies must ensure DIN authenticity during filings.
Shiv Kumar vs Registrar of Companies
Facts: Director was disqualified due to multiple DINs in different companies.
Holding: Disqualification was upheld; failure to maintain a single valid DIN is an offense.
Significance: Importance of single authentic DIN per individual.
In Re: Nandkishore Sharma (Delhi High Court)
Facts: Appointment challenged as DIN was misused in multiple filings.
Holding: Court emphasized the duty of companies to verify DIN before approving resolutions.
Significance: Directors and companies share joint verification responsibility.
MCA vs Satyam Computer Services (related to director identity fraud)
Facts: Fraudulent directors filed falsified DINs.
Holding: Severe action under Section 447 and Section 449; directors held personally liable.
Significance: Reinforces penal liability for fraudulent DINs.
Re: R. Srinivasan vs MCA
Facts: Dispute regarding change of DIN details not updated in MCA records.
Holding: Non-updation of DIN particulars can lead to penalties; directors must comply with notification obligations.
Significance: Ongoing verification and updating DIN data is mandatory.
5. Practical Takeaways
Companies must verify DIN before appointment – check MCA records, PAN, Aadhaar.
Directors must provide authentic and updated information to avoid penalties.
Professionals must confirm DIN authenticity during filings.
MCA has authority to cancel, disqualify, or penalize directors for fraudulent or incorrect DINs.
Regular checks are necessary, as wrong DIN filings can invalidate board resolutions and invite prosecution.
Conclusion:
DIN verification obligations are statutory, continuous, and shared among MCA, companies, and directors. Case laws demonstrate that failure to comply can lead to penalties, disqualification, or criminal liability. Proper verification and continuous updating of DIN records are essential for corporate governance.
RELATED Blog
comments