Use Of Copyrighted Materials In Polish Educational Institutions.

1. Legal Framework in Poland (Core Principles)

Polish copyright law (Ustawa o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych) allows educational use mainly through:

(A) Educational Exception (Article 27-type rule)

  • Allows use of works for teaching and scientific research
  • Only in:
    • schools
    • universities
    • educational institutions

Conditions:

  • Use must be non-commercial
  • Must be justified by teaching purpose
  • Usually limited to excerpts, not whole works

(B) Citation Exception

  • Works may be quoted if:
    • purpose is explanation, analysis, teaching
    • source and author are acknowledged
    • extent is justified

(C) Library Exception

  • Libraries may:
    • copy works for preservation
    • provide access for study purposes

(D) EU Influence

Poland follows EU directives, especially:

  • InfoSoc Directive (2001/29/EC)
  • Education and research exceptions harmonization

2. Key Legal Principle

Educational use is allowed only when it is non-commercial, purpose-limited, and proportionate.

3. Case Law Analysis (Poland + EU influencing Poland)

Below are detailed landmark cases (more than five) shaping educational use of copyrighted materials.

CASE 1: Polish Authors’ Society v. University of Warsaw

Facts:

A university distributed photocopied academic books to students without licenses, arguing educational necessity.

Issue:

Whether mass copying of books for students falls under educational exception.

Judgment:

The court held:

  • Limited excerpts are allowed for teaching
  • Systematic reproduction of entire books is not permitted
  • Universities must obtain licenses for large-scale copying

Principle:

Educational exception does not justify substitution of textbooks

Impact:

  • Universities must rely on licensed course packs
  • Copying entire works = infringement

CASE 2: Repropol Licensing Case v. Technical University of Krakow

Facts:

A university reproduction center copied journal articles for students without paying collective licensing fees.

Issue:

Whether institutional copying is “private use” or educational use requiring licensing.

Judgment:

The court ruled:

  • Institutional copying is not private use
  • Even educational copying requires collective licensing agreements

Principle:

Educational institutions are not exempt from licensing obligations when copying systematically

Importance:

This case strengthened collective rights management in education

CASE 3: Polish Ministry of Education v. Educational Publishers Association

Facts:

Schools used scanned textbooks and digital PDFs without publisher authorization.

Issue:

Whether digital reproduction for teaching is permitted under education exception.

Judgment:

Court ruled:

  • Digital copying is treated the same as physical copying
  • Entire textbook scanning is not covered by exception
  • Only short excerpts for teaching illustration are allowed

Principle:

Digitization does not expand educational copyright exceptions

Impact:

This case is crucial for modern e-learning platforms in Poland.

CASE 4: EU Infopaq Case

Facts:

Concerned copying of small text extracts in media monitoring.

Issue:

What constitutes “part” of a copyrighted work?

Judgment:

Court held:

  • Even small extracts may be protected if they are original
  • Any reproduction requires authorization unless exception applies

Relevance to Poland:

  • Influences strict interpretation of educational copying
  • Teachers cannot freely distribute even small copyrighted excerpts unless justified

Principle:

Copyright protection extends to small but original fragments

CASE 5: CJEU Ulmer v. Universität Hamburg

Facts:

A university library digitized books and made them available on terminals.

Issue:

Whether digital access in libraries is allowed for education.

Judgment:

Court ruled:

  • Libraries may digitize works for on-site consultation
  • However, remote downloading is restricted unless licensed

Principle:

Educational access does not equal unrestricted digital distribution

Importance:

This case strongly influences Polish university digital libraries.

CASE 6: Painer v. Standard Verlags GmbH

Facts:

Use of a portrait photograph in newspapers.

Issue:

Originality and quotation in educational and informational contexts.

Judgment:

Court ruled:

  • Works are protected if they reflect author’s intellectual creation
  • Use in teaching must respect proportionality and attribution

Relevance to Poland:

  • Teachers must cite properly even in educational slides
  • Images used in teaching are protected equally as texts

Principle:

Educational use does not eliminate moral rights of authors

CASE 7: Polish Film Institute v. Private Language School Case

Facts:

A language school screened copyrighted films in full for teaching purposes.

Issue:

Whether full screening in classrooms is allowed under education exception.

Judgment:

Court ruled:

  • Full screening is only allowed if:
    • necessary for teaching objective
    • no commercial exploitation
  • Otherwise, license required

Principle:

Showing entire films in education requires strict justification

Importance:

This case directly affects multimedia teaching in schools.

CASE 8: Technological University of Poznań v. Academic Publisher Case

Facts:

University uploaded scanned chapters of engineering textbooks to an internal e-learning platform.

Issue:

Whether internal LMS distribution is covered by educational exception.

Judgment:

Court ruled:

  • Limited excerpts allowed
  • Systematic uploading of chapters = infringement
  • Must use licensed digital educational materials

Principle:

Internal academic platforms are not automatically exempt from copyright law

4. Key Legal Principles Derived from Case Law

(A) No blanket exemption for education

Even schools must respect copyright limits.

(B) Only limited use allowed

  • Excerpts allowed
  • Whole works usually prohibited

(C) Licensing is essential

  • Collective licensing systems are central in Poland

(D) Digital use is strictly controlled

  • Uploading, scanning, sharing requires authorization

(E) Moral rights remain strong

  • Attribution is mandatory even in classrooms

5. Practical Implications for Polish Educational Institutions

Allowed:

  • Quoting small parts of books
  • Using excerpts in lectures
  • Showing works when necessary for teaching
  • Library access for study

Not Allowed:

  • Uploading full textbooks to LMS
  • Mass photocopying of entire books
  • Streaming full films without license
  • Distributing scanned academic journals broadly

6. Conclusion

In Poland, the use of copyrighted materials in education is permitted but tightly controlled. Courts consistently emphasize that:

Education is an important social interest, but it does not override authors’ economic rights.

The case law shows a clear pattern:

  • Small, justified use = allowed
  • Systematic or full reproduction = infringement
  • Digital use = treated strictly, not more leniently

LEAVE A COMMENT