Code of Massachusetts Regulations 980 CMR - ENERGY FACILITIES SITING COUNCIL

980 CMR — Energy Facilities Siting Council (EFSC)

What It Is

980 CMR is the section of Massachusetts administrative regulations that governs the Energy Facilities Siting Council (EFSC).

The EFSC is a state regulatory body that reviews, licenses, and monitors the siting of large energy facilities in Massachusetts.

Purpose and Policy

The overarching goals of 980 CMR are to:

Ensure reliable energy infrastructure while safeguarding public health and the environment.

Provide a consistent, transparent process for reviewing proposals for major energy facilities.

Balance energy needs with community and environmental considerations.

The regulations implement statutory authority granted by Massachusetts law directing the Council to oversee major energy projects.

What Types of Facilities EFSC Regulates

980 CMR applies to large-scale energy facilities, including:

Electric generation plants, such as natural gas, solar farms, wind farms, biomass facilities, and combined cycle plants.

Transmission facilities, including high-voltage power lines and associated infrastructure.

Major energy storage facilities, where applicable.

Large renewable energy installations exceeding certain capacity thresholds.

Smaller projects typically do not require EFSC review and fall under local permitting instead.

Key Components of 980 CMR

1. Jurisdiction and Applicability

Defines which projects need EFSC review based on criteria such as:

Facility type

Capacity

Location (e.g., within designated zones)

Projects that meet the thresholds must file an application with the EFSC.

2. Project Review and Licensing Process

The regulations set out a multi-step review process:

a. Pre-Application

Applicants often engage in pre-filing consultations with EFSC staff to clarify requirements.

b. Filing of a Petition

A proposed facility owner submits a petition containing:

Project description

Technical design

Environmental and public safety impacts

Proposed mitigation measures

c. Completeness Determination

EFSC reviews whether the petition is complete before proceeding.

d. Public Hearing and Comment

Public hearings give communities and stakeholders an opportunity to comment on the proposal.

The Council considers local concerns as part of its decision.

e. Review of Impacts

EFSC evaluates:

Environmental impacts: air quality, water resources, wetlands, noise

Public safety: risk of fire, hazardous materials, emergency response plans

Visual and land use impacts

Historical and cultural resources

Energy reliability and economic impacts

f. Decision and Conditions

EFSC issues either:

A license with specific conditions, or

A denial if requirements are not met.

Conditions may include environmental mitigation, monitoring, decommissioning plans, and community benefits.

3. Standards and Criteria

980 CMR sets standards against which proposals are evaluated, such as:

Environmental protection and resource conservation

Minimization of adverse impacts

Compliance with public health and safety norms

Consistency with state energy and climate goals

The Council considers the cumulative impacts of energy infrastructure on ecosystems and communities.

4. Monitoring and Compliance

After issuing a license:

EFSC monitors facility construction and operation to ensure compliance with license conditions.

Licensees must submit periodic reports and may be subject to inspections.

Non-compliance can result in enforcement actions, including fines or, in extreme cases, revocation of license.

5. Amendments and Modifications

If a licensed facility seeks changes (e.g., design or operating parameters), it must file a petition to amend the license.

EFSC reviews whether the changes affect prior findings and conditions.

6. Coordination with Other Agencies

EFSC’s process often overlaps with:

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP)

Department of Public Utilities (DPU)

Local planning boards and conservation commissions

The Council coordinates with these entities to avoid duplicative review and ensure compliance with applicable laws.

Practical Implications

For Developers

Must understand whether a project falls under 980 CMR thresholds.

Must prepare comprehensive technical, environmental, and community impact analyses.

Requires legal and consulting support to navigate a complex review.

For Communities

Citizens have a formal opportunity for participation and feedback.

EFSC incorporates public input into decision-making.

For Regulators

Balances energy needs with environmental conservation, public safety, and community interests.

Key Concepts to Remember

EFSC licenses major energy facilities beyond local permitting authority.

Large scale energy projects must undergo rigorous review before construction can begin.

Public participation is an integral part of the regulatory process.

Conditions imposed by EFSC licenses shape how projects are built and operated.

Monitoring ensures compliance throughout the life of the facility.

LEAVE A COMMENT