Differences Between Khula and Mubarat in Indian Muslim Personal Law

Differences Between Khula and Mubarat in Indian Muslim Personal Law

AspectKhulaMubarat
MeaningA form of divorce initiated by the wife, where she requests dissolution of marriage by returning the dower (mahr) or something else agreed upon.A mutual divorce where both spouses agree to end the marriage amicably by mutual consent.
Initiated byWifeBoth husband and wife jointly
Nature of DivorceUnilateral (wife’s right), but requires husband's consent or court's approvalBilateral (mutual agreement)
PaymentWife generally returns the dower or agreed compensation to husbandNo payment or compensation required unless agreed upon by both parties
ProcedureWife demands khula; husband must consent or wife approaches court for khulaBoth parties agree to separate and notify the court or registrar
EffectEnds the marriage; wife relinquishes rights to maintenance except during iddatEnds the marriage by mutual consent; parties free from each other’s obligations
Iddat PeriodWife must observe iddat period after khulaWife must observe iddat period after mubarat
Maintenance RightsUsually wife waives maintenance in khula (except during iddat)No maintenance obligation post mubarat unless agreed otherwise
Consent of HusbandIdeally required, but court can grant khula if husband refuses unreasonablyMust be mutual and voluntary
Judicial InterventionCourt can intervene to grant khula if husband unreasonably refusesUsually requires formal declaration by both parties; courts endorse mutual consent
Legal Basis in IndiaRecognized under Muslim personal law and codified through various judicial interpretationsRecognized under Muslim personal law as mutual consent divorce

Brief Explanation:

Khula is essentially the wife’s right to seek divorce by returning the dower or offering compensation, usually when the marriage cannot continue due to discord or cruelty. It is a form of wife-initiated divorce.

Mubarat is a mutual agreement to divorce, where both husband and wife voluntarily decide to part ways amicably without dispute. It is more like a negotiated separation.

Key Case Law:

Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum (AIR 1985 SC 945):
Discussed maintenance rights and conditions around khula.

Ghulam Abbas v. Khatoon (AIR 1946 PC 229):
Defined the nature of khula as requiring the wife’s consent and usually involving the return of dower.

Asma Bano v. State of UP (AIR 2014 SC 1981):
Emphasized importance of mutual consent in mubarat.

Summary:

PointKhulaMubarat
Divorce initiatorWifeBoth spouses
NatureWife-initiated, usually unilateralMutual consent, bilateral
PaymentWife returns dower/compensationUsually no payment
MaintenanceGenerally waived (except iddat)No maintenance unless agreed
ConsentHusband’s consent ideally requiredConsent of both mandatory
Court interventionPossible if husband refusesFormal declaration of mutual consent

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments