Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 335 - BOARD OF EXAMINERS FOR SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY AND AUDIOLOGY

πŸ›οΈ Overview of OAR Chapter 335 – Board of Examiners for Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology

OAR Chapter 335 establishes the regulatory framework for the licensing, certification, and oversight of speech-language pathologists (SLPs), audiologists, and speech-language pathology assistants (SLPAs) in Oregon. The rules are organized into several divisions:

Division 1 – Procedural Rules: Outlines the procedures for rulemaking, contested cases, and hearings.

Division 5 – Professional and Ethical Standards: Sets forth the ethical standards and professional conduct expected of licensees.

Division 10 – Record Keeping: Details requirements for maintaining client records.

Division 40 – Disciplinary Actions: Specifies grounds for disciplinary actions and procedures for enforcement.

Division 60 – Licensing: Covers the requirements and procedures for obtaining and renewing licenses.

Division 70 – Professional Development: Addresses continuing education and professional development requirements.

Division 80 – Conditional Licenses: Describes the issuance of conditional licenses for individuals completing post-graduate supervised clinical experience.

Division 85 – Temporary Licenses: Provides guidelines for issuing temporary licenses.

Division 90 – Confidentiality and Inadmissibility of Mediation Communications: Ensures confidentiality in mediation processes.

Division 95 – Speech-Language Pathology Assistants: Regulates the practice and supervision of SLPAs.

πŸ“˜ Key Provisions

Division 1 – Procedural Rules

Rule 335-001-0005 – Model Rules of Procedure: Adopts the Attorney General’s Model Rules of Procedure for contested cases. OregonLaws

Division 5 – Professional and Ethical Standards

Rule 335-005-0010 – Definitions: Defines terms such as "misrepresentation" and "unprofessional conduct," including failure to cooperate in investigations and making false statements. OregonLaws

Division 10 – Record Keeping

Rule 335-010-0050 to 335-010-0080: Establishes requirements for maintaining client records, including documentation standards and retention periods.

Division 40 – Disciplinary Actions

Rule 335-040-0005: Specifies grounds for disciplinary actions, including unprofessional conduct and violation of ethical standards.

Division 60 – Licensing

Rule 335-060-0005 – Definitions: Defines terms related to licensing, including "inactive license" and "conditional license." OregonLaws

Rule 335-060-0006: Outlines the educational and clinical experience requirements for licensure.

Division 70 – Professional Development

Rule 335-070-0050 – Responsibilities and Professional Development Reporting Requirements of Licensees: Requires licensees to complete 20 professional development hours every two years and maintain documentation for four years. Justia Regulations

Division 80 – Conditional Licenses

Rule 335-080-0005 – Definitions: Describes conditional licenses issued to applicants completing post-graduate supervised clinical experience. Justia Regulations

Division 95 – Speech-Language Pathology Assistants

Rule 335-095-0040 – Qualifications for Supervising Speech-Language Pathology Assistants: Specifies requirements for supervising SLPAs, including licensure and professional experience. OregonLaws

βš–οΈ Hypothetical Case Law Scenarios

Case 1: Unprofessional Conduct and Disciplinary Action

Facts: A licensed audiologist, Dr. Smith, is found to have falsified patient records to secure insurance reimbursements.

Issue: Whether Dr. Smith's actions constitute unprofessional conduct under OAR 335-005-0010.

Analysis: Under OAR 335-005-0010, unprofessional conduct includes "making a false statement to the Board" and "any act of theft, dishonesty or misrepresentation involving a client, another practitioner, third party providers, or a government agency." OregonLaws

Conclusion: Dr. Smith's actions fall within the definition of unprofessional conduct. The Board may initiate disciplinary proceedings, which could result in suspension or revocation of licensure.

Case 2: Conditional License and Supervision Requirements

Facts: Ms. Johnson, a recent graduate, applies for a conditional license to practice as a speech-language pathologist while completing her post-graduate supervised clinical experience.

Issue: Whether Ms. Johnson meets the requirements for a conditional license under OAR 335-080-0005.

Analysis: OAR 335-080-0005 defines a conditional license as one issued to applicants who have completed degree requirements and are engaged in post-graduate supervised clinical experience until they obtain regular licensure. The supervisor must hold an active license in speech-language pathology issued by the Board or hold their Certificate of Clinical Competency in Speech-Language Pathology issued by the American Speech-Language Hearing Association. Justia Regulations

Conclusion: If Ms. Johnson has completed the necessary degree requirements and has secured a qualified supervisor, she is eligible for a conditional license.

πŸ“ Conclusion

OAR Chapter 335 provides a comprehensive regulatory framework for the practice of speech-language pathology and audiology in Oregon. It ensures that practitioners adhere to high standards of professional conduct, maintain appropriate records, engage in continuous professional development, and operate under valid licensure. The

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments