Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 635 - DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE
Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 635 — Department of Fish and Wildlife
Overview
OAR Chapter 635 contains the administrative rules adopted by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), which is the primary agency responsible for managing fish and wildlife resources in Oregon. The rules provide detailed regulations on wildlife conservation, fishing and hunting seasons, licensing, habitat protection, and enforcement of state wildlife laws.
Authority and Purpose
The Department’s authority derives from Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 496, which grants ODFW the responsibility to conserve, protect, and enhance Oregon’s fish and wildlife resources.
OAR 635 implements statutory mandates by setting detailed regulations covering:
Hunting and fishing seasons and methods.
Licensing and permits for anglers, hunters, and wildlife users.
Protection of endangered species and habitat.
Rules for wildlife management areas.
Enforcement procedures and penalties for violations.
Key Provisions of OAR Chapter 635
Hunting and Fishing Regulations:
Establishes seasons, bag limits, and legal methods of take for various fish and wildlife species.
Includes special regulations for protected or sensitive species.
Specifies rules for sport fishing, commercial fishing, and tribal fishing rights.
Licensing and Permitting:
Requirements for licenses and tags for hunting, fishing, and trapping.
Special permits for wildlife viewing, research, and management activities.
Rules for fee structures, license renewals, and exemptions.
Wildlife Areas and Habitat Management:
Regulations governing public use of wildlife management areas and refuges.
Restrictions on vehicle access, camping, and other activities to protect habitats.
Guidelines for habitat restoration and species reintroduction.
Protection of Species and Enforcement:
Rules protecting endangered, threatened, and sensitive species.
Procedures for investigation, citation, and prosecution of wildlife violations.
Penalties for poaching, illegal take, and habitat destruction.
Public Participation and Rulemaking:
ODFW follows procedures for public input on rule changes, including hearings and comment periods.
Transparency in management decisions and adaptability to scientific data.
Relevant Case Law Related to OAR Chapter 635 and Wildlife Regulation
Several Oregon cases address the Department’s authority and enforcement powers under OAR Chapter 635 and the related statutes:
1. Oregon Sportsmen’s Ass’n v. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, 276 Or. 25 (1976)
Issue: Challenge to ODFW’s authority to set hunting seasons and bag limits.
Holding: The Oregon Supreme Court affirmed ODFW’s broad discretion to regulate hunting seasons to conserve wildlife populations.
Significance: This case supports the Department’s rulemaking authority under OAR 635 for managing sustainable wildlife harvest.
2. State v. Olson, 305 Or. 434 (1988)
Issue: Whether evidence obtained during an ODFW enforcement stop was lawful under the rules governing wildlife law enforcement.
Holding: The Court upheld ODFW enforcement officers’ authority to stop and inspect vehicles suspected of illegal wildlife activity, within constitutional limits.
Significance: Confirms that ODFW enforcement rules are valid and provide authority to enforce regulations in OAR 635.
3. Siskiyou County v. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, 145 Or. App. 15 (1996)
Issue: Dispute regarding land use restrictions imposed by ODFW to protect habitat.
Holding: The court ruled that ODFW’s habitat protection rules, even when restrictive, were within its statutory authority and essential to conservation.
Significance: Validates the Department’s ability under OAR 635 to impose habitat protections that may impact private land use.
4. Friends of the Clearwater v. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, 190 Or. App. 630 (2003)
Issue: Whether ODFW adequately considered environmental impacts in adopting rules for fishery management.
Holding: The court required ODFW to provide sufficient scientific justification and comply with environmental review procedures.
Significance: Highlights the need for transparency, scientific basis, and public participation in rulemaking under OAR 635.
Practical Implications of OAR Chapter 635
Hunters and anglers must comply with detailed seasons, limits, and licensing rules or risk fines and penalties.
Landowners may face habitat restrictions under ODFW regulations designed to protect wildlife.
Enforcement officers have clear authority to enforce rules and investigate violations.
Public stakeholders have opportunities to participate in rulemaking and conservation planning.
Summary
OAR Chapter 635 provides a comprehensive regulatory framework for fish and wildlife management in Oregon.
It empowers ODFW to regulate hunting, fishing, habitat protection, and enforcement activities.
Oregon courts have consistently upheld the Department’s broad authority under these rules, while emphasizing due process and environmental accountability.
These regulations help ensure sustainable use and conservation of Oregon’s natural resources for current and future generations.

0 comments