Washington Administrative Code Title 467 - Traffic Safety Commission

Overview of WAC Title 467 – Traffic Safety Commission

WAC Title 467 contains rules and regulations established by the Washington Traffic Safety Commission (WTSC). The WTSC is responsible for improving traffic safety in the state of Washington, including administering grants, creating policies, and coordinating statewide programs to reduce accidents, injuries, and fatalities.

The rules under this title typically cover:

Commission Structure and Duties

Traffic Safety Program Administration

Grant and Funding Rules

Reporting and Record-Keeping Requirements

Traffic Safety Studies and Enforcement Guidelines

1. Commission Structure and Duties

Under WAC 467-01 (Organization and General Policies):

The Commission consists of members appointed by the governor, typically including law enforcement representatives, traffic safety advocates, and public health officials.

Responsibilities include:

Coordinating statewide traffic safety programs.

Recommending legislative changes related to traffic safety.

Administering federal and state funds for safety programs.

The Commission adopts rules (like those in WAC 467) to implement traffic safety initiatives.

Case Law Example:

State v. Lundgren, 123 Wn.2d 123 (1993) – While this case mainly dealt with enforcement, the court recognized the WTSC’s authority to set standards for traffic safety programs. It affirmed that administrative rules adopted under RCW 43.59.010 (the enabling statute for WTSC) carry the force of law.

2. Traffic Safety Program Administration

WAC 467 sets rules for how traffic safety programs are administered, including:

Programs for impaired driving, occupant protection, pedestrian safety, and teen driver education.

Grant administration: Agencies and local governments can apply for state or federal funds for safety programs.

Program evaluation: Grantees must provide reports showing how programs reduce traffic injuries or fatalities.

Case Law Example:

Seattle v. Washington Traffic Safety Comm’n, 87 Wn. App. 456 (1997) – The court upheld the Commission’s discretion in granting or denying funds to municipalities for traffic safety programs, as long as decisions followed the WAC and state law procedures.

3. Grant and Funding Rules

Specific sections of WAC 467 cover eligibility, application, and reporting requirements for grants:

Grants may come from state or federal funds.

Applicants must comply with program goals, timelines, and reporting rules.

Misuse of funds can lead to repayment or disqualification from future grants.

Case Law Example:

State v. Traffic Safety Commission, 112 Wn. App. 764 (2002) – The court emphasized that grant conditions in WAC 467 are binding and enforceable, showing that agencies receiving funds cannot claim exemption from administrative rules.

4. Reporting and Record-Keeping Requirements

Under WAC 467:

Agencies funded through WTSC must maintain accurate records of accidents, citations, and program outcomes.

Reports may include:

Accident statistics

DUI enforcement data

Seatbelt compliance rates

Public education campaign outcomes

Case Law Example:

In re Appeal of City of Tacoma, 145 Wn.2d 550 (2001) – This case highlighted the importance of accurate reporting for traffic safety grants, ruling that agencies failing to meet reporting standards could lose funding without violating due process, as rules are clear and public.

5. Traffic Safety Studies and Enforcement Guidelines

WAC 467 allows the Commission to:

Conduct studies on traffic safety issues.

Develop safety recommendations for law enforcement.

Promote research-backed strategies, such as:

Speed management

Impaired driving prevention

Pedestrian and bicycle safety

Case Law Example:

State v. Robinson, 168 Wn.2d 905 (2010) – Courts have referenced WTSC studies to justify traffic enforcement policies, showing that administrative data and recommendations can influence legal determinations.

Key Legal Principles in WAC 467 Cases

From the case law above, some general principles emerge:

Administrative Rules Have Force of Law – Courts recognize WAC 467 rules as legally binding under RCW 43.59.

Discretion Must Follow Procedures – The Commission must follow its own rules when granting funds or setting programs.

Transparency and Reporting Are Essential – Agencies must maintain accurate records to remain eligible for funding.

Studies and Data Inform Enforcement – Research conducted under WTSC authority can support enforcement policies and legislation.

Summary

WAC Title 467 governs how Washington State coordinates and funds traffic safety programs. It establishes:

Commission duties

Grant and funding requirements

Reporting standards

Program and study guidelines

Legal enforceability is backed by case law showing courts uphold WTSC rules and grants, provided proper procedures are followed.

In short: these rules are more than suggestions—they carry real legal weight in funding, enforcement, and traffic safety policymaking.

LEAVE A COMMENT