West Virginia Code of State Rules Agency 29 - Speech-Language Pathology And Audiology
I. Purpose of Agency 29
West Virginia CSR Agency 29 regulates the practice of speech-language pathology (SLP) and audiology in the state. Its goal is to:
Protect public health and safety by ensuring only qualified professionals provide services.
Set licensure standards, continuing education requirements, and ethical rules.
Establish the Board of Examiners for Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology as the regulatory body.
Legal basis:
The rules are authorized under West Virginia Code §30-22-1 et seq., which gives the Board authority to license, discipline, and regulate professionals in these fields.
II. Structure of Agency 29
1. Series 1 – General Provisions
Defines terms: “audiologist,” “speech-language pathologist,” “assistant,” “supervision,” and “scope of practice.”
Establishes Board authority, procedural rules, and licensing requirements.
Legal significance:
Courts rely on these definitions when evaluating claims of unlicensed practice or disciplinary disputes.
2. Series 2 – Licensure Requirements
Specifies education, degree, and clinical experience requirements.
Requires national examination passage (e.g., Praxis or equivalent).
Establishes temporary or provisional licenses.
Key point: Licensure is a legal prerequisite to practice; unlicensed practice may trigger both administrative and criminal penalties.
3. Series 3 – Scope of Practice
Outlines what SLPs and audiologists may and may not do.
Distinguishes between diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.
Defines supervision of assistants or students.
Courts and boards rely on these rules to evaluate professional negligence and scope-of-practice violations.
4. Series 4 – Continuing Education
Requires licensed professionals to complete CEUs periodically.
Defines acceptable types of education (conferences, workshops, online courses).
Legal significance: Failure to meet CE requirements can lead to license suspension or revocation, but courts generally uphold administrative discretion if rules are clear and applied fairly.
5. Series 5 – Disciplinary Procedures
Covers grounds for discipline, including:
Fraud or misrepresentation
Gross negligence
Unethical practice
Substance abuse affecting practice
Establishes notice, hearing, and appeal procedures.
Legal principle: Boards must follow procedural due process; failure to do so may invalidate sanctions.
III. Case Law Involving Agency 29 and Licensing Rules
West Virginia case law specifically mentioning Agency 29 is limited, but courts have interpreted its rules in the context of administrative law, licensure disputes, and professional negligence.
1. Board Enforcement of Licensing Requirements
Case principle: Courts defer to the Board’s interpretation of rules as long as the rules are reasonably related to public protection.
Example scenario: A person practicing without a license challenges a Board order. Courts have consistently held that:
The Board may enforce licensure rules.
License denial or revocation for failure to meet education or exam standards is legally valid.
2. Scope-of-Practice Disputes
Courts review whether professionals acted within the legal scope outlined by Agency 29.
If an SLP or audiologist provides services beyond their authorized duties, the Board may discipline, and courts usually uphold the Board’s authority.
Key legal theme: Protecting patient safety outweighs minor procedural mistakes, as long as basic due process is followed.
3. Disciplinary Proceedings and Due Process
West Virginia appellate courts emphasize:
Notice of allegations is required.
Opportunity to be heard before the Board.
Evidence must support findings of misconduct or incompetence.
Case law: Licensees appealing Board actions may succeed only if the Board abused discretion, ignored evidence, or violated procedural rules. Mere disagreement with a professional judgment is not enough.
4. Negligence and Malpractice Cases
Agency 29 rules often serve as a standard of care in malpractice lawsuits.
Courts may ask: Did the SLP or audiologist meet the minimum standards set by the Board, including supervision, documentation, and clinical procedures?
IV. Key Legal Themes
Licensure is mandatory: Practicing without a valid license is both a regulatory and potential criminal violation.
Scope-of-practice is legally enforceable: Going beyond defined duties can trigger sanctions.
CEUs and ongoing compliance matter: Boards have wide discretion to enforce continuing education rules.
Due process protections are critical: Boards must provide proper notice, hearing, and opportunity for appeal.
Agency rules often serve as the standard of care in professional negligence claims.
V. Practical Implications
Professionals must check their licensure status before practicing in WV.
Supervision of assistants or students must strictly follow Agency 29 rules.
Boards have discretion to discipline for a wide range of misconduct, but must follow fair process.
CEUs, documentation, and adherence to clinical standards protect practitioners from both disciplinary action and civil liability.
VI. Summary
West Virginia CSR Agency 29 functions as a comprehensive regulatory framework for SLPs and audiologists. It balances:
Public safety
Professional standards
Legal due process
Courts generally defer to the Board in enforcing rules, defining scope of practice, and disciplining licensees, as long as procedural fairness is maintained.
RELATED Blog
comments