Fraud and Abuse under Health Law
🔍 What is Fraud and Abuse in Health Law?
In the context of U.S. health care law, fraud and abuse refer to illegal or unethical practices by health care providers, suppliers, or patients that result in improper payments or financial gain under federal health care programs such as Medicare and Medicaid.
📌 Key Definitions
Fraud: The intentional deception or misrepresentation made by a person with the knowledge that it could result in unauthorized benefit.
Abuse: Practices that may not be intentionally deceptive, but are inconsistent with accepted medical or business practices and result in unnecessary costs to health programs.
🧾 Common Types of Fraud and Abuse
1. Billing for Services Not Provided
Submitting claims for procedures or services that were never actually performed.
Example Case: U.S. v. Krizek (1997)
Dr. Krizek, a psychiatrist, was found liable for submitting claims for more time than he actually spent with patients. The court held that reckless disregard for billing accuracy constituted fraud under health law.
2. Upcoding
Billing for a more expensive service or procedure than was actually provided.
Example Case: U.S. ex rel. Schmidt v. Zimmer, Inc. (2005)
Zimmer was accused of upcoding medical devices. While the case focused on regulatory interpretation, the court emphasized the importance of accuracy in billing codes to avoid abuse.
3. Unbundling
Billing separately for procedures that are usually billed as a single, inclusive package.
4. Kickbacks
Receiving or offering something of value in exchange for referrals of patients or services.
Example Case: U.S. v. Greber (1985)
The court found that paying physicians for patient referrals, even if partially for services rendered, violated health law if one purpose of the payment was to induce referrals.
5. Medically Unnecessary Services
Providing and billing for services that are not medically necessary.
Example Case: U.S. v. Mackby (2000)
Mackby operated a physical therapy clinic and submitted claims under a physician’s provider number without the physician’s involvement. The services billed were not medically necessary or properly supervised, leading to liability under fraud laws.
🧑⚖️ Legal Standards Applied
Knowledge Standard
In fraud cases, courts often apply a "knowing and willful" standard—meaning the person must have intended to deceive or acted with reckless disregard.
False Claims Liability
Submitting false claims to government health programs is a central issue. Courts have ruled that even reckless ignorance or deliberate ignorance of billing standards can lead to liability.
Qui Tam Actions (Whistleblower Suits)
Whistleblowers (often insiders) can sue on behalf of the government in cases of fraud, and may receive a portion of the recovery. These cases often trigger investigations and settlements in health law enforcement.
🏥 Institutional Compliance and Enforcement
Enforcement Agencies:
Office of Inspector General (OIG)
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
They conduct audits, investigations, and civil/criminal prosecutions for violations.
⚖️ Key Case Summary Table
| Case Name | Issue | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. v. Krizek (1997) | Overbilling time spent with patients | Reckless billing = fraud |
| U.S. v. Greber (1985) | Kickbacks for referrals | Payments with referral motive = illegal |
| U.S. v. Mackby (2000) | False use of physician’s provider # | Liable for submitting false claims |
| U.S. ex rel. Schmidt v. Zimmer (2005) | Upcoding allegations | Reinforced importance of accurate billing |
✅ Preventing Fraud and Abuse
Health care providers must implement:
Compliance Programs
Routine Audits
Staff Training on Billing Practices
Monitoring Referral Relationships
Proper Documentation
Failure to maintain these controls can lead to liability even if no intent to defraud existed.
🧠 Conclusion
Fraud and abuse in health law involve a range of illegal or improper practices that can result in civil penalties, criminal charges, or exclusion from federal programs. Courts consider both the intent and the recklessness of providers, and enforcement continues to increase with whistleblower support and audit programs.
Understanding these principles and legal precedents is crucial for any health care professional or legal advisor involved in health compliance or litigation.
RELATED Blog
0 comments