Media laws at Fiji

Fiji's media laws have undergone significant changes in recent years, particularly with the repeal of a controversial piece of legislation. Here's a breakdown of the current landscape:

I. Recent Major Change: Repeal of the Media Industry Development Act (MIDA)

Historical Context: For over a decade (since 2010), Fiji's media was heavily regulated by the Media Industry Development Act (MIDA), which was introduced by the military regime after the 2006 coup. MIDA was widely criticized by international human rights organizations and press freedom advocates for its repressive nature. Key features of MIDA included:


Content restrictions: Forbade news reporting "against the national interest or public order."

Ownership restrictions: Required media organizations to be 90% Fijian-owned.

Punitive penalties: Imposed high fines and potential jail terms for journalists breaching the decree.

Regulatory body: Established the Media Industry Development Authority (MIDA) to enforce these standards.

Repeal in 2023: Following the 2022 general election, the new coalition government led by Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka made a campaign promise to repeal MIDA. This promise was fulfilled on April 6, 2023, when the Media Industry Development (Repeal) Act 2023 was passed by Parliament, effectively scrapping the controversial law and the authority it established.


Significance: The repeal of MIDA is widely considered a significant victory for media freedom and democracy in Fiji, ending an era of what was termed "media oppression" and "fear factor" in the sector.

II. Current Key Legislation and Principles:

With MIDA repealed, Fiji's media now operates under a more open framework, primarily guided by:

Constitution of Fiji:

Freedom of Expression: The Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and expression, including freedom of the press and other media. This is the fundamental right upon which media operations are based.

Right to Information: The Constitution also contains provisions relating to the right to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas, which is a crucial aspect of media's role in a democratic society.

Online Safety Act 2018: This Act was enacted to promote online safety, deter harmful electronic communication, and establish the Online Safety Commission (OSC).

Purpose: The OSC works to promote responsible online behavior, address online bullying, stalking, internet trolling, and image-based abuse. It provides an avenue for individuals to report harmful online content.

Scope: While its primary focus is on individual safety online, its provisions regarding "harmful electronic communication" could potentially have implications for online media content, particularly regarding incitement to violence, hate speech, or dissemination of false information causing harm.

Defamation Act (1879) and Common Law: Fiji's defamation laws are based on common law principles and the Defamation Act of 1879.

Types: Defamation can be classified as libel (written) or slander (spoken).

Elements: Requires the communication of a false statement that harms a person's reputation.

Defenses: Common defenses include truth, honest opinion, and public interest.

Implications for Media: Journalists can be subject to defamation lawsuits if their reporting is found to be false and damaging to a person's reputation.

Broadcasting Commission Act [Cap 105]: This Act governs the establishment and operation of broadcasting services in Fiji, including the Fiji Broadcasting Commission. It outlines general principles for broadcasting content, such as taste and decency, impartiality, and avoiding content that promotes civil insurrection or public disorder.

Telecommunications Act: Regulates telecommunications services, including aspects relevant to the transmission of media content.

Copyright Act: Protects intellectual property rights, including those related to journalistic works, photographs, and broadcasts.

Crimes Act 2009: Contains general provisions on offenses that could apply to media, such as incitement, sedition (though these have been less frequently used against media recently compared to the MIDA era), and obscenity.

III. Regulatory Bodies:

Online Safety Commission (OSC): As mentioned, established under the Online Safety Act 2018, it is an independent regulator for online safety.

Department of Communications: Part of the Fijian government, it plays a role in policy and potentially some regulatory aspects related to media and telecommunications.

Broadcasting Commission: Oversees broadcasting services.

Fijian Media Association (FMA): A professional body representing journalists and media organizations, which advocates for media freedom and plays a role in self-regulation and ethical standards.

IV. Current Environment and Future Outlook:

With the repeal of MIDA, Fiji's media now enjoys a significantly improved environment for freedom of expression. However, challenges and ongoing vigilance remain important:

Self-Regulation: The focus is now shifting more towards media organizations adopting and adhering to codes of ethics and professional standards.

Capacity Building: There's a need for continued investment in journalism education and training to ensure high-quality, ethical, and responsible reporting.

Online Safety vs. Freedom of Expression: The Online Safety Act, while aiming to combat online harm, needs careful application to ensure it does not inadvertently stifle legitimate free expression or critical reporting.

Defamation: While a standard legal tool, the potential for defamation lawsuits can still pose a challenge to media, especially for smaller outlets.

Overall, Fiji's media laws are moving towards a more liberal and internationally aligned framework, promoting a more independent and vibrant press.

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments