Media laws at Japan
Japan has a well-established and sophisticated legal framework for media, largely rooted in its post-WWII Constitution, which guarantees fundamental freedoms. However, like any advanced nation, it also balances these freedoms with other rights and public interests.
1. Constitutional Guarantees:
Article 21 of the Constitution of Japan (1947): This is the cornerstone of media freedom in Japan. It explicitly states:
"Freedom of assembly and association as well as speech, press and all other forms of expression are guaranteed."
"No censorship shall be maintained, nor shall the secrecy of any means of communication be violated."
Article 13 (Right to pursuit of happiness and individual dignity): This article is often interpreted by courts to imply a right to privacy and reputation, which forms the basis for legal actions like defamation and invasion of privacy.
2. Key Media-Specific Legislation:
Broadcasting Act (Act No. 132 of 1950): This is the primary law governing radio and television broadcasting. It:
Establishes the public broadcaster, NHK (Japan Broadcasting Corporation), as a statutory corporation funded by viewer fees, designed to be independent of government control.
Regulates commercial broadcasters, setting licensing requirements and operational standards.
Article 3 guarantees editorial freedom for broadcast programs, stating they "must not be interfered with or regulated by any person, except in cases pursuant to the authority provided for in laws."
Article 4 sets out general rules for program editing, including requirements for impartiality, not distorting facts, and clarity on conflicting opinions where public interest issues are involved.
Prohibition of Advertisements on NHK: NHK is generally prohibited from airing advertisements.
Telecommunications Business Act (Act No. 86 of 1984): This law governs the broader telecommunications sector, including internet service providers.
Article 3 explicitly prohibits censorship of communications handled by a telecommunications carrier.
Article 4 protects the secrecy of communications.
It regulates licensing and operations of telecommunications businesses.
Act on Access to Information Held by Administrative Organs (1999) / Freedom of Information Act: This law grants any person, corporation, or group the right to request access to information held by national government administrative agencies.
It specifies categories of information that may be exempt from disclosure (e.g., personal information, national security secrets, information that could impede law enforcement).
It mandates a response within 30 days, which can be extended.
A separate but similar law exists for "incorporated administrative agencies" (quasi-governmental bodies).
Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI) (Act No. 57 of 2003, with significant revisions in 2017 and 2022): This is Japan's comprehensive data protection law.
It regulates the collection, use, storage, and sharing of personal information by organizations.
It generally requires consent for the collection and transfer of personal information, especially sensitive data or transfers outside Japan.
It established the Personal Information Protection Commission (PPC) as the independent regulatory body.
While it has exemptions for journalism (information handled for the purpose of journalistic activities, for example), these exemptions are not absolute, and media organizations are still expected to adhere to ethical standards regarding privacy.
Act on the Protection of Specially Designated Secrets (2014): This law allows the government to designate certain information as "specially designated secrets" related to national security. Critics have raised concerns that this law could be used to restrict media access to information and potentially criminalize leaks, impacting press freedom.
3. General Laws Affecting Media:
Criminal Code of Japan:
Defamation (Article 230): Defamation can be prosecuted both civilly and criminally in Japan.
Criminal defamation punishes "a person who defames another by alleging facts in public," regardless of truth or falsity.
However, punishment is not imposed if the act relates to matters of public interest, is done solely for the public benefit, and the truth of the alleged facts is proven.
Obscenity (Article 175): This article restricts the distribution, sale, or public display of "obscene documents, drawings, or other objects." This has historically led to a practice of self-censorship in pornography (e.g., mosaic censorship).
Civil Code of Japan:
Defamation (Articles 709 & 710): A person defamed can file a civil suit for damages and/or "suitable measures for the restoration of reputation" (e.g., public apology, retraction).
Privacy: While not explicitly defined by statute, the courts have recognized a right to privacy, and media outlets can be sued for invasion of privacy if they publish private information without justification.
Copyright Law: Protects intellectual property rights, including those of journalists and media organizations.
Public Officials Law / Self-Defense Forces Law / Local Officials Law: These laws contain "obligation to protect secrets" clauses, prohibiting civil servants from leaking classified information, even after retirement.
4. Regulatory Bodies:
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (MIC): Oversees broadcasting and telecommunications, including licensing and spectrum management.
Personal Information Protection Commission (PPC): Independent body overseeing the APPI.
The Courts: Japanese courts handle civil and criminal cases related to media, including defamation, privacy, and challenges to government information disclosure decisions.
5. Self-Regulation:
Japan Newspaper Publishers and Editors Association (NSK - Nihon Shinbun Kyokai): This independent and voluntary organization plays a significant role in promoting ethical standards in reporting. It has adopted the "Canon of Journalism," which outlines principles such as:
Freedom and Responsibility
Accuracy and Fairness
Independence and Tolerance
Respect for Human Rights
Decency and Moderation
Japan Commercial Broadcasters Association (NAB): Similar to the NSK, the NAB establishes ethical guidelines for its members.
Challenges and Criticisms:
Despite strong constitutional guarantees, Japan's media landscape faces some criticisms, including:
Kisha Club System: The exclusive "kisha club" (press club) system has been criticized for limiting access for independent journalists, freelancers, and foreign reporters to government briefings and information, potentially fostering a cozy relationship between mainstream media and authorities.
Self-Censorship: Concerns exist about self-censorship among journalists, particularly on politically sensitive topics or regarding major corporations, potentially due to unspoken pressures from within news organizations or the desire to maintain access to official sources.
Specially Designated Secrets Act: While intended for national security, critics fear its broad interpretation could chill reporting on government activities.
Online Insults Law (2022 amendment to the Penal Code): This amendment introduced stricter penalties for "online insults" following cases of cyberbullying, raising some concerns about potential impacts on freedom of expression, although its primary aim is to curb severe online harassment.
Criminal Defamation: While rarely resulting in long prison sentences, the continued existence of criminal defamation laws is seen by some international press freedom advocates as an outdated tool that could be used to intimidate journalists.
Overall, Japan possesses a robust legal framework for media freedom, but its practical application and the ongoing evolution of information access and digital rights continue to be areas of discussion and potential reform.
RELATED Blog
0 comments