Retaliation Against Employees for Exercising Legal Rights under Employment Law
Retaliation Against Employees for Exercising Legal Rights under Employment Law
1. What is Retaliation in Employment Law?
Retaliation occurs when an employer takes adverse action against an employee because the employee engaged in legally protected activity. This protected activity can include:
Filing a complaint about discrimination or harassment.
Reporting workplace safety violations.
Participating in investigations or lawsuits.
Exercising rights under wage and hour laws.
Taking family or medical leave under FMLA.
Whistleblowing.
Retaliation is prohibited under various federal statutes such as:
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (1964)
Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA)
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Whistleblower Protection Laws
2. Examples of Retaliatory Actions
Adverse actions can include:
Termination or demotion.
Salary reduction or withholding raises.
Unfair discipline or negative performance reviews.
Reassignment to undesirable shifts or tasks.
Harassment or hostile work environment.
Denial of promotions or training opportunities.
3. Legal Standards to Prove Retaliation
To establish a retaliation claim, generally, an employee must show:
Protected Activity: The employee engaged in a legally protected activity (e.g., filing a discrimination complaint).
Adverse Employment Action: The employer took a materially adverse action that would deter a reasonable person from exercising rights.
Causal Connection: There is a link between the protected activity and the adverse action.
If these elements are met, the burden shifts to the employer to provide a legitimate, non-retaliatory reason for the action. The employee can then show that the employer’s reason is a pretext for retaliation.
4. Relevant Case Law
a) Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White (2006)
Facts: An employee was reassigned to less desirable duties and suspended without pay after filing a discrimination complaint.
Held: The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the scope of retaliation claims is broad and includes any action that might deter a reasonable worker from making or supporting a charge of discrimination.
Significance: Established that retaliation claims do not require the same level of harm as discrimination claims, broadening protection.
b) Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP (2011)
Facts: The Supreme Court ruled on whether retaliation protections apply to third parties closely related to an employee filing a discrimination complaint.
Held: The Court held that close relationships, such as fiancés, are protected from retaliation.
Significance: Expanded retaliation protection to “bystanders” associated with protected employees.
c) Robinson v. Shell Oil Co. (1997)
Facts: The plaintiff alleged retaliation after complaining about racial discrimination.
Held: The Court confirmed that Title VII prohibits retaliation against employees who oppose discriminatory practices.
Significance: Affirmed the fundamental right to be free from retaliation for opposing discrimination.
5. Remedies for Retaliation
When retaliation is proven, courts can award:
Reinstatement or promotion.
Back pay and lost benefits.
Compensatory damages (emotional distress).
Punitive damages (in cases of willful misconduct).
Attorney’s fees and costs.
Injunctive relief (orders preventing further retaliation).
6. Practical Tips for Employers
Develop clear anti-retaliation policies.
Train supervisors and managers.
Investigate complaints promptly and fairly.
Avoid adverse actions immediately following complaints.
Document legitimate reasons for employment decisions.
7. Summary Table
| Element | Description |
|---|---|
| Protected Activity | Employee exercises legal right (e.g., complaints) |
| Adverse Action | Employer action that could deter employee |
| Causal Link | Connection between activity and adverse action |
| Employer Defense | Legitimate, non-retaliatory reason |
Conclusion
Retaliation against employees for exercising their legal rights is a serious violation of employment law. Courts provide broad protections to encourage employees to report violations without fear. Employers must be vigilant in preventing retaliation and handling complaints properly.
RELATED Blog
0 comments