Evolution of Corporate Governance in India
Evolution of Corporate Governance in India
✅ 1. Introduction to Corporate Governance
Corporate Governance refers to the system of rules, practices, and processes by which a company is directed and controlled. It involves balancing the interests of stakeholders such as shareholders, management, customers, suppliers, financiers, government, and the community.
In India, the concept of corporate governance has evolved gradually, influenced by economic liberalization, corporate frauds, regulatory reforms, and judicial activism.
✅ 2. Phases of Evolution of Corporate Governance in India
🔹 Phase 1: Pre-Liberalization Era (Before 1991)
Corporate governance was not a formalized concept.
Most companies were family-owned or PSUs (Public Sector Undertakings).
There was minimal regulation and little concern for minority shareholders.
Board decisions were often opaque, and regulatory oversight was weak.
🔹 Phase 2: Post-Liberalization and Early Reforms (1991–1999)
1991 Economic Liberalization led to an increase in private investment and the need for transparent governance.
Corporate scandals (e.g., Harshad Mehta scam, 1992) exposed regulatory weaknesses.
Need for reforms to attract foreign investment and improve credibility of Indian companies.
➤ Major Initiatives:
Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) Code (1998):
First voluntary code of corporate governance in India.
Emphasized transparency, board independence, and audit committee roles.
🔹 Phase 3: Regulatory Framework (2000–2008)
This phase witnessed formal introduction of governance norms through SEBI and Companies Act.
➤ SEBI Initiatives:
Clause 49 of the Listing Agreement (2000) introduced:
Independent directors
Audit committees
Board procedures
Disclosures and transparency norms
➤ Naresh Chandra Committee (2002):
Suggested reforms in auditor–company relationship.
Recommended establishing independent audit committees.
➤ Narayana Murthy Committee (2003):
Suggested strengthening of Clause 49.
Emphasis on whistleblower policies and disclosure norms.
🔹 Phase 4: Post-Satyam Scam Reforms (2009–2013)
The Satyam Computers scandal (2009) was a turning point in India’s corporate governance history. The company's chairman, Ramalinga Raju, admitted to manipulating accounts, leading to a loss of investor confidence.
➤ Key Lessons:
Need for independent oversight, auditor accountability, and strengthening of regulatory mechanisms.
➤ Reforms Post-Satyam:
SEBI strengthened Clause 49 with stricter norms.
Emphasis on whistleblower protection, related-party transactions, and role of independent directors.
Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) became more active.
🔹 Phase 5: Companies Act, 2013 and Beyond
The Companies Act, 2013 marked a comprehensive overhaul of corporate law in India with strong governance mechanisms.
➤ Key Provisions:
Mandatory appointment of independent directors (for listed and large companies).
One Woman Director on the board (for certain companies).
Audit Committees and Nomination & Remuneration Committees mandatory.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) made mandatory under Section 135.
Whistleblower policy encouraged.
Director’s responsibilities codified under Section 166.
➤ National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA):
Established as an independent regulator for auditing profession post-Satyam.
🔹 Phase 6: Strengthening Governance through SEBI (2014–Present)
➤ Kotak Committee on Corporate Governance (2017):
Recommended major reforms to improve effectiveness of boards, disclosure norms, and accountability.
SEBI adopted many recommendations, including:
Separation of Chairman and MD roles
Enhanced role of audit committees
Better disclosure of related-party transactions
Improved independence of directors
➤ SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015:
Replaced Clause 49
Comprehensive listing obligations including governance, financials, and compliance
✅ 3. Key Case Laws on Corporate Governance in India
🔹 Satyam Computer Services Ltd. Scam (2009)
Facts: The company’s promoters inflated revenue and profits to the tune of ₹7,000+ crores.
Impact: Exposed failures in auditing, board oversight, and governance mechanisms.
Legal Outcome: SEBI and SFIO intervened. Ramalinga Raju and others convicted.
Reform: Triggered revamp of governance norms under Companies Act 2013.
🔹 Tata Sons Ltd. v. Cyrus Mistry (2020)
Facts: Removal of Cyrus Mistry as Chairman of Tata Sons led to a legal dispute.
Issue: Allegations of oppression and mismanagement under Section 241 of the Companies Act.
Supreme Court Holding: Upheld Tata Sons’ decision; emphasized the autonomy of the board.
Governance Implication: Highlighted the importance of boardroom democracy and clarity in board powers.
🔹 PIL in Zee Entertainment–Invesco Dispute (2021)
Facts: Foreign investor sought to remove CEO and directors.
Legal Insight: Debate over shareholder rights vs. board autonomy.
Significance: Raised issues about governance in promoter-driven firms and investor protection.
✅ 4. Challenges in Indian Corporate Governance
Promoter dominance in most Indian companies.
Ineffective independent directors.
Poor minority shareholder protection.
Weak enforcement of laws.
Limited accountability for auditors.
✅ 5. Recent Developments and the Way Forward
Increased regulatory activism by SEBI and MCA.
ESG (Environmental, Social & Governance) metrics gaining importance.
Focus on diversity, transparency, and board evaluations.
Stricter penalties for non-compliance.
Suggested Measures:
Strengthen independence of directors and auditors.
Greater enforcement of disclosures and penalties.
Encourage shareholder activism and participation.
✅ 6. Conclusion
The evolution of corporate governance in India reflects the country’s transition from a closed, promoter-dominated system to a regulated, transparent, and investor-friendly environment. While significant progress has been made, challenges remain, especially in enforcement and cultural transformation within corporate boards.
Corporate governance is no longer a compliance burden but a strategic tool to enhance trust, reputation, and long-term sustainability.
RELATED Blog
0 comments