Administrative law challenges in the governance of emerging technologies
Administrative Law Challenges in the Governance of Emerging Technologies
I. Introduction
Emerging technologies—such as artificial intelligence (AI), biotechnology, blockchain, and autonomous vehicles—pose unique challenges for governance. Administrative law, which governs the actions of public authorities and agencies, must adapt to:
Rapid innovation cycles,
Complex technical issues,
Uncertain risks,
Cross-border implications,
Balancing innovation promotion with public safety and ethical concerns.
Administrative agencies tasked with regulating these technologies face legal challenges around rulemaking, enforcement, transparency, accountability, and judicial review.
II. Core Administrative Law Challenges in Emerging Tech Governance
| Challenge | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Regulatory Uncertainty | Fast technological changes outpace law and regulation. |
| Technical Complexity | Agencies often lack technical expertise to make informed decisions. |
| Procedural Fairness | Ensuring meaningful public participation and consultation in complex, opaque decisions. |
| Balancing Innovation and Risk | Promoting technology while managing safety, privacy, and ethics. |
| Transparency and Accountability | “Black-box” decisions by AI regulators or agencies challenge openness. |
| Jurisdictional and Cross-Border Issues | Emerging tech often transcends national borders, complicating enforcement. |
III. Case Law Analysis: More Than Four Important Cases
1. R (Bridges) v South Wales Police [2020] EWCA Civ 1058 (UK)
Facts:
South Wales Police used live facial recognition technology (FRT) in public spaces without clear legal frameworks or public consultation.
Issue:
Whether the use of FRT violated privacy rights and whether administrative use was lawful, transparent, and proportionate.
Holding:
The Court of Appeal held that while FRT deployment was not inherently unlawful, the police had a duty to ensure proper legal basis, transparency, and proportionality. Lack of public consultation and transparency was problematic.
Impact:
Emphasized the need for clear statutory authorization for new tech deployment.
Highlighted administrative duty of transparency and fairness in emerging tech regulation.
2. Mozilla Foundation v. Federal Communications Commission (FCC), 940 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2019, US)
Facts:
The FCC repealed net neutrality rules, claiming it had regulatory authority to do so under administrative law.
Issue:
Whether the FCC’s action was lawful and complied with administrative procedural requirements, including reasoned decision-making.
Holding:
The court vacated parts of the repeal, emphasizing that administrative agencies must provide reasoned explanations and consider reliance interests before changing policy.
Impact:
Showcases the challenge of regulatory uncertainty in technology policy.
Reinforces that administrative agencies must follow procedural fairness and justification, especially in rapidly evolving tech sectors.
3. United States v. Microsoft Corp., 56 F.3d 1448 (D.C. Cir. 1995)
Facts:
The US government challenged Microsoft’s bundling of its browser with Windows, raising antitrust and administrative regulatory issues.
Issue:
Whether administrative agencies had the authority and appropriate procedures to regulate novel software markets.
Holding:
The courts upheld the administrative enforcement actions but emphasized the need for agencies to have clear mandates and transparent procedures in regulating emerging tech sectors.
Impact:
Highlights administrative law’s role in balancing innovation, competition, and regulation.
Emphasizes agency accountability in complex tech oversight.
4. Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Ltd and Maximillian Schrems (Schrems II), Case C-311/18 (CJEU, 2020)
Facts:
Schrems challenged the adequacy of data protection mechanisms for transferring EU personal data to the US, implicating emerging digital and cloud technologies.
Issue:
Whether administrative bodies responsible for enforcing data privacy adequately protected individuals’ rights against cross-border data transfers.
Holding:
The Court invalidated the “Privacy Shield” framework, underscoring the responsibility of administrative regulators to rigorously enforce data protection laws in light of new tech realities.
Impact:
Demonstrates administrative law challenges in regulating data flows in the digital age.
Highlights need for robust oversight of emerging tech’s privacy impacts.
5. R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police (UK Supreme Court, 2023)
Facts:
An appeal from the earlier Court of Appeal decision on facial recognition technology use.
Issue:
Whether the police use of FRT was lawful under human rights and administrative law principles.
Holding:
The Supreme Court clarified that use of such technology requires a legal framework, transparency, and proper safeguards. However, it accepted the potential for lawful use within strict conditions.
Impact:
Solidifies legal and administrative prerequisites for emerging technology use by public bodies.
Stresses proportionality and accountability under administrative law.
IV. Themes and Lessons from the Cases
| Theme | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Legal Basis and Clear Mandates | Emerging tech regulation requires explicit statutory authority. |
| Reasoned and Transparent Decision-Making | Agencies must provide clear, well-reasoned explanations, especially when changing policy. |
| Fairness and Public Participation | Procedural fairness, including consultation, is crucial in novel tech governance. |
| Balancing Innovation with Rights Protection | Administrative law mediates between fostering tech growth and safeguarding privacy, competition, and safety. |
| Cross-Border and Complex Regulation | Effective governance requires coordination across jurisdictions and robust enforcement mechanisms. |
V. Conclusion
Administrative law is at the forefront of challenges posed by emerging technologies. Courts increasingly require agencies to:
Act within clear legal authority,
Follow transparent, accountable procedures,
Balance innovation with fundamental rights and public interests,
Adapt regulatory frameworks to rapid technological evolution,
Engage in meaningful consultation and public engagement.
The case law shows the law’s evolving nature as it strives to provide a legal structure enabling innovation while guarding against risks inherent in emerging technologies.
RELATED Blog
0 comments