The concept of Rule of Law and its Applicability in India
1. Meaning of Rule of Law
The Rule of Law is a fundamental principle that no one is above the law, including the government. It ensures that all actions of the state and individuals are subject to law and justice.
Origin: The concept originates from A.V. Dicey, a British jurist.
Core Ideas of Dicey’s Rule of Law:
Supremacy of Law: The law is supreme, not arbitrary decisions of rulers.
Equality Before Law: Every individual, regardless of position, is equal before the law.
Predominance of Legal Spirit: Rights and obligations are protected by judicial decisions, not discretionary powers.
Key Feature:
The government must act according to law.
Arbitrary actions and misuse of power are not allowed.
2. Rule of Law vs. Arbitrary Rule
| Feature | Rule of Law | Arbitrary Rule |
|---|---|---|
| Power | Limited by law | Unlimited, unchecked |
| Equality | Equality before law | Discrimination possible |
| Justice | Legal remedies exist | No legal remedy |
| Accountability | Government accountable | Government not accountable |
3. Applicability of Rule of Law in India
India follows the Doctrine of Rule of Law, but it is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. It is implied through:
Article 14 – Equality before law
Article 19 – Protection of certain freedoms
Article 21 – Protection of life and personal liberty
Article 32 – Right to constitutional remedies
Judicial interpretations have reinforced Rule of Law in India.
4. Key Case Laws in India
1. A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras (1950)
Facts: Preventive detention of a person under a law.
Held: Courts emphasized that even executive powers like preventive detention are subject to legal provisions.
Principle: No arbitrary deprivation of liberty; government actions must comply with law.
2. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)
Facts: Passport of Maneka Gandhi was impounded by the government without a proper procedure.
Held: Article 21 ensures life and liberty cannot be curtailed arbitrarily; due process of law must be followed.
Principle: Strengthened the Rule of Law in India; executive actions are judicially reviewable.
3. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)
Facts: Parliament amended Constitution affecting fundamental rights.
Held: Introduced Basic Structure Doctrine.
Principle: Even constitutional amendments must conform to fundamental principles of the Constitution, reinforcing Rule of Law.
4. Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975)
Facts: Election disputes and misuse of executive powers.
Held: Judiciary emphasized accountability of all authorities, including the Prime Minister.
5. Modern Applicability in India
Equality Before Law: No person, including the Prime Minister or ministers, can act above the law.
Judicial Review: Courts can strike down arbitrary government actions violating law or Constitution.
Protection of Fundamental Rights: Rule of Law ensures laws comply with Articles 14, 19, 21.
Limitation on Executive Power: Rule of Law prevents misuse of discretionary powers in governance.
6. Summary
The Rule of Law is the cornerstone of democracy and constitutionalism.
In India, it is implied through fundamental rights and judicial review.
Courts have reinforced the principle that no one, including the government, is above law.
Key cases: A.K. Gopalan, Maneka Gandhi, Kesavananda Bharati, Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain.
RELATED Blog
0 comments