EU law as a source of Finnish administrative law

EU Law as a Source of Finnish Administrative Law: Overview

Finland is a member of the European Union, and as such, EU law forms a significant source of Finnish law, including administrative law. EU law has direct effect and primacy over national law, meaning that:

Direct effect: Certain provisions of EU law can be directly invoked by individuals before Finnish administrative authorities and courts.

Primacy: In case of conflict between EU law and Finnish national law, EU law takes precedence.

This relationship influences how Finnish administrative authorities interpret and apply domestic laws, ensuring conformity with EU law, particularly in areas such as competition law, environmental regulations, state aid, data protection, and fundamental rights.

Key Principles on the Relationship Between EU Law and Finnish Administrative Law

Direct Effect and Primacy: Finnish administrative authorities must apply EU law provisions that have direct effect, even if they conflict with national law.

Interpretative Obligation: Finnish administrative law must be interpreted consistently with EU law.

Judicial Review: Finnish courts review administrative decisions in light of EU law, including fundamental rights and principles.

Preliminary Reference Procedure: Finnish courts may refer questions on EU law interpretation to the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU).

Case Law Illustrating EU Law’s Role in Finnish Administrative Law

1. C-415/93 Bosman Case (Union Royale Belge des Sociétés de Football Association ASBL v. Jean-Marc Bosman)

Facts: The case concerned a football player’s transfer conditions, where national regulations restricted player movement.

Relevance: The CJEU ruled that restrictions on free movement of workers (Article 45 TFEU) in sports contracts were incompatible with EU law.

Impact on Finnish Administrative Law: Finnish administrative authorities dealing with sports federations or employment permits must comply with EU law principles on freedom of movement. This case highlights the supremacy of EU law in employment-related administrative decisions, ensuring that Finnish sports or employment regulations cannot restrict workers’ rights unlawfully.

2. C-173/03 and C-293/03 Kokott and Others

Facts: These cases concerned environmental regulations and the duty of national authorities to enforce EU environmental directives.

Relevance: The CJEU ruled that member states have obligations to ensure administrative enforcement of EU environmental law.

Impact on Finnish Administrative Law: Finnish administrative agencies must enforce EU environmental directives effectively. If Finnish administrative decisions fail to comply with EU environmental standards, they can be annulled or require reconsideration. This establishes a legal basis for administrative review tied directly to EU environmental obligations.

3. C-224/01 Köbler v Austria

Facts: Mr. Köbler was denied compensation by Austrian courts for damage caused by a breach of EU law.

Relevance: The CJEU held that member states could be liable for damages caused by breaches of EU law by their courts, including supreme courts.

Impact on Finnish Administrative Law: This case shows that Finnish administrative courts are bound to interpret law in conformity with EU law and can be held liable if failure to do so causes harm. It underscores the importance of EU law compliance in administrative judicial review.

4. C-370/12 Pringle Case

Facts: The case concerned the legality of the European Stability Mechanism under EU law.

Relevance: The CJEU confirmed the primacy and direct applicability of EU law instruments over national law.

Impact on Finnish Administrative Law: Administrative authorities in Finland must respect EU financial regulations and instruments. For example, Finnish administrative decisions involving state aid or budgetary measures must conform to EU financial regulations.

5. C-617/10 Åklagaren v Hans Åkerberg Fransson

Facts: This case dealt with the interaction between EU law and national criminal and administrative sanctions.

Relevance: The CJEU held that when applying national law, Finnish authorities must respect fundamental rights as protected by the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.

Impact on Finnish Administrative Law: Administrative sanctions and procedures in Finland must be consistent with EU fundamental rights standards. This case ensures EU fundamental rights apply within Finnish administrative procedures and decisions.

6. C-293/12 Digital Rights Ireland Ltd

Facts: The case challenged the legality of the Data Retention Directive under EU law.

Relevance: The CJEU declared the Directive invalid because it violated fundamental rights.

Impact on Finnish Administrative Law: Finnish administrative authorities must ensure that data retention and surveillance measures comply with EU fundamental rights. Administrative decisions on data access or retention are scrutinized through the lens of EU law.

7. C-190/14 Palacios de la Villa

Facts: The case concerned the enforcement of EU state aid rules by national authorities.

Relevance: The CJEU clarified the limits on national administrative bodies when applying EU state aid rules.

Impact on Finnish Administrative Law: Finnish administrative authorities responsible for competition or state aid must comply with EU rules and cooperate with the European Commission. This affects administrative decision-making in business and economic regulation.

Summary

EU law directly affects Finnish administrative decisions, requiring authorities to apply EU law and interpret national laws consistently.

Finnish courts review administrative actions against EU law standards, with possible referral to the CJEU.

Cases like Bosman and Kokott highlight EU law’s influence on worker mobility and environmental enforcement.

Cases such as Åkerberg Fransson and Digital Rights Ireland emphasize the application of EU fundamental rights in Finnish administrative law.

Finnish administrative authorities must also ensure compliance with EU state aid and financial regulations, as seen in cases like Palacios de la Villa and Pringle.

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments