Abrief overview of the conept Act of state

Concept of Act of State: Overview with Case Law

1. Meaning and Definition

The Act of State doctrine is a principle in public and international law which states that:

"Every sovereign state is bound to respect the independence and sovereignty of every other sovereign state and its official acts."

In other words, the courts of one country will not examine or question the validity or legality of public acts done by a foreign sovereign government within its own territory.

This doctrine prevents the domestic courts from interfering with or adjudicating on the acts of a foreign government done in the exercise of its sovereign authority.

2. Key Features of Act of State Doctrine

Applies only to acts done by a sovereign government or its agencies.

Applies only to acts done within the sovereign territory of that foreign state.

Protects the principle of sovereign equality and non-interference.

The doctrine bars judicial review of such acts by domestic courts.

Usually invoked in cases involving nationalization, expropriation, confiscation, or any sovereign act by a foreign state.

It is a rule of comity and public policy.

3. Rationale

To maintain international comity and diplomatic relations.

To avoid interference in foreign sovereign matters.

To uphold the principle of non-justiciability of sovereign acts of foreign governments.

4. Scope and Limitations

The doctrine applies only to acts of foreign states, not acts of domestic government.

Does not apply if the act is done outside the sovereign territory.

It does not protect acts that are violative of international law or jus cogens norms.

Courts may refuse to apply the doctrine where fundamental human rights or domestic public policy are involved.

5. Case Law Analysis

1. Union of India v. Sankalchand Himatlal (1977) 4 SCC 193

Facts: Indian company claimed compensation for nationalization of its assets in a foreign country.

Held: The Court refused to question the validity of foreign sovereign acts of nationalization.

Significance: Reaffirmed the Act of State doctrine and that Indian courts will not sit in judgment of sovereign acts of foreign countries.

2. Government of India v. Taylor (1955) AC 491 (Privy Council)

The Privy Council held that the acts of a foreign government relating to its public and sovereign functions within its territory cannot be questioned in courts of another country.

The decision emphasized the doctrine of sovereign immunity and Act of State.

3. Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino (1964) 376 US 398 (US Supreme Court)

A landmark US case on the Act of State doctrine.

The Court held that US courts would not question the validity of nationalization acts by a foreign sovereign within its territory.

This case set the precedent for non-intervention in acts of foreign sovereigns under US law.

4. British Imex Industries Ltd. v. M.V. “Sea Success” (1980) 3 WLR 703

The English Court upheld the Act of State doctrine.

The court refused to interfere with acts of a foreign state that had nationalized a ship.

The case reinforced the principle that national courts will not judge the acts of foreign sovereigns done in their territory.

5. India Steamship Co. Ltd. v. S.S. Corporation, AIR 1961 SC 1153

The Supreme Court of India held that the doctrine applies to acts of foreign governments that are sovereign in nature.

It protected the act of expropriation by foreign states from judicial interference.

6. Distinction Between Sovereign Immunity and Act of State

Sovereign Immunity protects a foreign state from being sued in domestic courts.

Act of State doctrine bars courts from questioning the validity of sovereign acts done within its territory.

Both doctrines complement each other but are distinct in their application.

7. Summary Table

AspectDescription
DefinitionNon-justiciability of foreign sovereign acts
Applies toActs done by foreign government within its territory
Key PurposeMaintain international comity and respect sovereignty
Not ApplicableDomestic sovereign acts, acts outside territory, violations of jus cogens
Judicial EffectCourts refuse to question or invalidate such acts
Related ConceptsSovereign Immunity, Public Policy

8. Conclusion

The Act of State doctrine is an important principle that ensures domestic courts respect the sovereignty of foreign states by refraining from questioning their sovereign acts done within their own territories. While it promotes international comity and stability, its application is balanced against fundamental human rights and domestic public policy concerns.

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments