Tribunals and Types of Tribunals in India
🔹 Tribunals and Types of Tribunals in India
1. What are Tribunals?
Tribunals are quasi-judicial bodies established by the legislature to adjudicate disputes related to specific fields or sectors, such as taxation, labor, administrative services, or commercial matters. They are created to provide:
Specialized adjudication
Speedier disposal of cases
Relief from overburdened regular courts
Tribunals operate independently but their decisions are subject to judicial review by regular courts.
2. Constitutional and Legal Basis
Article 323A & 323B of the Indian Constitution empower Parliament and State Legislatures to establish administrative tribunals and other tribunals.
The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 deals with service-related disputes of government employees.
Various other Acts establish tribunals for specific domains (Income Tax Act, Customs Act, Competition Act, etc.).
3. Types of Tribunals in India
| Tribunal Type | Description | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Administrative Tribunals | Handle service matters of government employees | Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), State Administrative Tribunals (SAT) |
| Tax Tribunals | Adjudicate tax-related disputes | Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) |
| Regulatory Tribunals | Deal with specific regulatory issues | Competition Commission of India (CCI), Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) |
| Consumer and Commercial Tribunals | Handle consumer disputes and commercial cases | National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) |
| Special Tribunals | Handle unique matters | Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT), National Green Tribunal (NGT) |
🔹 Key Case Laws on Tribunals in India
Case 1: L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India, (1997) 3 SCC 261
Facts:
The Supreme Court was asked to decide whether the decisions of tribunals could be subjected to judicial review by High Courts and Supreme Court.
Held:
The Court held that tribunals are subject to judicial review, and the power of the High Courts and Supreme Court under Articles 226 and 32 of the Constitution to review tribunal decisions cannot be excluded.
Significance:
This case affirms the constitutional validity of judicial review over tribunals and prevents tribunals from becoming final and unchecked adjudicators.
Case 2: Union of India v. R. Gandhi, (2010) 11 SCC 1
Facts:
The issue was whether the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) can have jurisdiction over posts filled by promotion, including those under statutory provisions.
Held:
The Supreme Court held that CAT has jurisdiction over service matters of government employees but not over posts filled by statutory provisions or under specific statutes.
Significance:
Clarifies the scope and limitation of tribunal jurisdiction, protecting legislative intent.
Case 3: K.K. Verma v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 527
Facts:
Questioned the constitutional validity of administrative tribunals under Article 323A.
Held:
The Court upheld the validity of tribunals, emphasizing that they provide a specialized forum for efficient dispute resolution in service matters.
Significance:
Supports the establishment of specialized tribunals as constitutionally valid and necessary.
Case 4: Cochin International Airport Ltd. v. K.N. Nair, (2000) 2 SCC 617
Facts:
An appeal was filed against a tribunal’s decision concerning labor disputes.
Held:
The Supreme Court held that tribunals must ensure fair hearing and follow natural justice principles.
Significance:
Reaffirms that tribunals must act fairly and cannot violate procedural rights despite being specialized bodies.
Case 5: V. Sriharan v. Union of India, (2015) 7 SCC 792
Facts:
Question of whether NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal) can interfere with insolvency proceedings.
Held:
Supreme Court emphasized the specialized expertise and finality of tribunal decisions in commercial and insolvency matters.
Significance:
Highlights the tribunal’s role in efficient commercial dispute resolution.
🔹 Advantages of Tribunals in India
Expertise: Members usually have domain-specific knowledge.
Speed: Less formal than courts, allowing faster resolution.
Reduced Burden: Helps decongest the judiciary.
Flexibility: Can adopt less rigid procedures.
🔹 Challenges Faced by Tribunals
Delays due to understaffing.
Overlapping jurisdiction with courts.
Issues with independence and appointments.
Limited awareness about tribunal remedies among litigants.
🔹 Conclusion
Tribunals in India play a vital role in ensuring specialized, speedy, and effective adjudication in various fields, complementing the judicial system. However, their decisions remain under judicial review to maintain the rule of law and protect fundamental rights.
RELATED Blog
0 comments