Constitutional validity of Delegated Legislation
🔹 Constitutional Validity of Delegated Legislation: Detailed Explanation
1. What is Delegated Legislation?
Delegated legislation (also called subordinate or subsidiary legislation) refers to rules, regulations, bylaws, notifications, or orders made by an authority (usually the executive) under powers delegated by the legislature through a parent statute.
This system is adopted because legislatures cannot deal with every detailed aspect of law due to complexity and volume of modern governance.
2. Constitutional Basis
The Indian Constitution does not explicitly mention delegated legislation but allows it implicitly through Articles 245 and 246, which empower Parliament and State Legislatures to make laws.
Article 253 empowers Parliament to legislate for implementing international treaties.
The parent statute (Enabling Act) grants authority to make delegated legislation by defining the extent and limits of such powers.
3. Constitutional Validity Tests
The constitutionality of delegated legislation depends on:
| Test/Requirement | Explanation |
|---|---|
| 1. Authority by Parent Act | Must be expressly authorized by statute; no delegated legislation without a parent Act. |
| 2. Within the scope of the Act | Must be within the limits and purpose of the empowering statute. |
| 3. Consistency with the Constitution | Cannot violate fundamental rights or constitutional provisions. |
| 4. No Excessive Delegation | Delegation must not be so broad or vague as to amount to “excessive delegation” or abdication. |
| 5. Reasonable guidelines | Parent Act should provide adequate guidelines/principles to guide delegated legislation. |
4. Doctrine of Delegated Legislation in India
The delegation must be specific and limited; general or absolute delegation is unconstitutional.
The legislature cannot abdicate its legislative function to the executive.
Courts exercise judicial review to ensure delegated legi⚖️ Parliamentary Control over Delegated Legislation: An Analysis
I. Introduction
Delegated legislation refers to laws or regulations made by an authority (usually the executive or administrative agencies) under powers conferred by an Act of Parliament. Since Parliament delegates its legislative power, it must retain mechanisms to control, supervise, and ensure that delegated legislation is within the scope and limits prescribed.
Parliamentary control is essential to maintain democratic accountability and rule of law by ensuring that the executive or subordinate authorities do not misuse or exceed the powers delegated to them.
II. Need for Parliamentary Control
To prevent excessive or unauthorized delegation of legislative powers.
To ensure delegated legislation conforms to policy and purpose set by the parent Act.
To enable scrutiny and accountability of laws made without direct parliamentary debate.
To protect fundamental rights and constitutional principles from arbitrary delegated acts.
III. Types of Parliamentary Control
1. Affirmative Resolution Procedure
Delegated legislation must be expressly approved by Parliament before it becomes effective.
It requires a positive vote by either or both Houses.
Used for important or controversial regulations.
2. Negative Resolution Procedure
Delegated legislation is laid before Parliament and will become law unless either House objects within a specified period (usually 40 days).
Allows automatic operation unless annulled.
Most common method for routine regulations.
3. Supervisory Committees
Parliamentary committees (e.g., Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments) examine delegated legislation for legality, clarity, and consistency.
Committees report irregularities, leading to potential annulment or revision.
4. Judicial Review
Though not a parliamentary function, courts provide a form of control by reviewing delegated legislation for ultra vires acts (beyond the powers delegated).
Courts can strike down delegated legislation violating constitutional or statutory limits.
IV. Mechanisms and Procedures of Parliamentary Control
| Mechanism | Description | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Affirmative Resolution | Explicit parliamentary approval before enactment | Ensures scrutiny of important delegated laws |
| Negative Resolution | Automatic unless annulled by Parliament within time limit | Balances efficiency with parliamentary oversight |
| Parliamentary Committees | Examine technical and legal aspects of delegated laws | Quality control and reporting on delegated laws |
| Judicial Review | Courts review legality and constitutionality | Prevent abuse of delegated powers |
V. Case Laws on Parliamentary Control over Delegated Legislation
1. Agricultural Produce Market Committee v. Shyam Sunder Gupta, AIR 1963 SC 1405
Facts:
The delegated rules made by a committee under statutory authority were challenged for exceeding the powers given by the parent Act.
Holding:
The Supreme Court held that delegated legislation is subject to strict limits laid down by the enabling Act and must conform to the statute’s purpose.
Significance:
Parliament’s control via clear limits in parent legislation is crucial.
Courts protect Parliament's intent by scrutinizing delegated laws.
2. K. Krishnan v. State of Madras, AIR 1956 SC 748
Facts:
Challenge to delegated rules framed under broad enabling provisions.
Holding:
Court held that even broad delegations must comply with parliamentary intent and safeguards.
Significance:
Emphasized the importance of statutory safeguards as a parliamentary control mechanism.
Parliament’s power to frame guidelines restricts delegated lawmaking.
3. R. vs. Home Secretary, ex parte Fire Brigades Union, [1995] 2 AC 513 (UK)
Facts:
The Home Secretary did not implement a statutory compensation scheme but introduced a less generous scheme through delegated legislation.
Holding:
The House of Lords held that delegated legislation cannot be used to override or circumvent Parliament's clear statutory intent.
Significance:
Illustrates judicial enforcement of parliamentary supremacy over delegated legislation.
Parliamentary control includes ensuring delegated laws align with legislative intent.
4. Bengal Immunity Company Ltd. v. State of Bihar, AIR 1955 SC 661
Facts:
The constitutionality of delegated legislation under a state statute was challenged.
Holding:
The Court observed that delegation is valid only if there is adequate parliamentary control and safeguards.
Significance:
Reinforces the constitutional requirement of parliamentary supervision on delegated laws.
Delegation without control is void.
5. Kehar Singh v. Union of India, AIR 1988 SC 1883
Facts:
Challenge to delegated legislation related to preventive detention.
Holding:
The Court observed that delegation must not be such as to undermine fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution and must be subject to effective parliamentary control.
Significance:
Parliamentary control is essential when delegated laws affect fundamental rights.
Parliamentary oversight balances power and rights protection.
VI. Summary Table of Case Laws
| Case Name | Issue | Outcome / Principle Emphasized |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural Produce Market Committee v. Shyam Sunder Gupta | Limits of delegated legislation | Delegated laws must conform to enabling statute |
| K. Krishnan v. State of Madras | Broad delegation with safeguards | Importance of statutory guidelines from Parliament |
| R. v. Home Secretary (UK) | Delegated legislation vs statutory intent | Delegated laws cannot override Parliament's will |
| Bengal Immunity Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar | Constitutionality of delegation | Parliamentary control and safeguards essential |
| Kehar Singh v. Union of India | Delegation affecting fundamental rights | Parliamentary oversight protects rights |
VII. Conclusion
Parliamentary control over delegated legislation is fundamental to ensure:
That the executive’s law-making powers are exercised within prescribed limits.
Delegated laws reflect Parliament’s will and statutory purpose.
There is transparency, accountability, and protection of fundamental rights.
The balance of powers under the Constitution is maintained.
The combination of affirmative/negative procedures, committee scrutiny, and judicial review effectively safeguards parliamentary sovereignty against misuse of delegated powers.slation conforms to constitutional limits.
🔹 Landmark Case Laws on Constitutional Validity of Delegated Legislation
1. A.K. Roy v. Union of India, AIR 1982 SC 710
Facts:
Challenge to the constitutional validity of certain delegated legislation related to preventive detention.
Held:
Supreme Court held that delegated legislation must follow the principle of legality and cannot violate fundamental rights or go beyond the enabling statute.
Significance:
Affirmed judicial review over delegated legislation for constitutional validity.
2. K.C. Gajapati Narayan Deo v. Orissa, AIR 1953 SC 19
Facts:
Validity of delegated rules under the Orissa Land Reforms Act was challenged.
Held:
The Court stated that if Parliament or Legislature delegates legislative power, it must lay down the policy and principles; delegated authority must follow these guidelines.
Significance:
Laid down the principle that delegated legislation must adhere to the policy laid down in the parent Act.
3. Rajasthan State Electricity Board v. Mohan Lal, AIR 1967 SC 1857
Facts:
Validity of rules framed by the Electricity Board challenged for being ultra vires.
Held:
Rules must not go beyond the scope of power conferred by the parent Act.
Significance:
Reinforced the principle that delegated legislation must be within the four corners of enabling statute.
4. Union of India v. Tarlochan Singh, AIR 1984 SC 1413
Facts:
Question whether an executive notification issued under a vague statute was valid.
Held:
Court invalidated the delegated legislation for lack of sufficient guidelines and excessive delegation.
Significance:
Highlighted the doctrine of excessive delegation — legislature cannot give carte blanche powers to executive.
5. Vasantha Kumar v. Union of India, AIR 1992 SC 2228
Facts:
Challenge to a delegated legislation for lack of procedure and violation of natural justice.
Held:
Court held delegated legislation must comply with principles of natural justice and procedural fairness.
Significance:
Delegated legislation must respect fundamental procedural safeguards.
🔹 Summary Table
| Case | Principle Established |
|---|---|
| A.K. Roy v. Union of India | Judicial review to check constitutionality of delegated legislation |
| K.C. Gajapati Narayan Deo | Delegated legislation must follow policy and principles in parent Act |
| Rajasthan State Electricity Board | Delegated legislation must be within scope of parent Act |
| Union of India v. Tarlochan Singh | Doctrine of excessive delegation - delegation must have limits |
| Vasantha Kumar v. Union of India | Delegated legislation must comply with natural justice |
🔹 Conclusion
Delegated legislation is constitutionally valid in India only when it is authorized by statute, confined within the parent Act’s framework, and does not violate the Constitution or fundamental rights. Courts play a vital role in maintaining the balance through judicial review, preventing abuse of delegated powers, and ensuring social justice.
RELATED Blog
0 comments