Investigating the impact of globalization on administrative law principles
Investigating the Impact of Globalization on Administrative Law Principles
I. Overview: What is Globalization in the Context of Administrative Law?
Globalization refers to the increasing interconnectedness of economies, legal systems, and governance across national borders. In the context of administrative law, globalization has:
Expanded the influence of international and transnational norms
Increased the role of global institutions (e.g., WTO, UN, EU)
Prompted domestic courts to reference international law and comparative principles
Raised questions about accountability and transparency in cross-border governance
This has affected administrative law principles such as:
Procedural fairness
Judicial review
Rule of law
Legitimacy of non-state actors and international regulatory bodies
II. Key Impacts of Globalization on Administrative Law
| Impact | Explanation |
|---|---|
| International Norms in Domestic Law | Courts increasingly consider treaties, foreign decisions, and global standards. |
| Rise of Global Regulatory Networks | Regulatory decisions often influenced by international organizations (e.g., WTO, WHO). |
| Shift in Accountability Models | Need for oversight of both domestic and international administrative actors. |
| Comparative Administrative Law Growth | Cross-referencing of legal standards among jurisdictions. |
III. Detailed Case Law Illustrating These Effects
1. USA – Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006)
Context:
Salim Hamdan, a Guantanamo detainee, challenged the legitimacy of U.S. military commissions set up to try him for alleged war crimes.
Globalization Aspect:
The case examined whether the commissions violated international norms, including the Geneva Conventions.
Holding:
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the commissions violated both domestic military law and international law, particularly Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions.
Impact on Administrative Law:
This case showed how international legal standards influenced domestic administrative processes, particularly in times of war, shaping due process and procedural fairness.
2. UK – R (on the application of Daly) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] UKHL 26
Context:
The claimant, a prisoner, challenged a prison policy that allowed officers to search legal correspondence in his absence.
Globalization Aspect:
The court heavily relied on European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) standards—especially Article 8 (Right to Private Life).
Holding:
The House of Lords held that the policy was disproportionate and violated prisoners' rights under the ECHR.
Impact on Administrative Law:
The case illustrated how supranational human rights law (ECHR) reshapes domestic administrative decisions, particularly in balancing state power and individual rights.
3. India – Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1997 SC 3011
Context:
A case filed after the brutal gang rape of a social worker, highlighting the lack of domestic laws against sexual harassment in the workplace.
Globalization Aspect:
The Indian Supreme Court relied on international conventions, specifically the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), to fill legislative gaps.
Holding:
The Court laid down guidelines (known as Vishaka Guidelines) for protection against sexual harassment at workplaces.
Impact on Administrative Law:
Vishaka showed how courts can use international treaties and soft law to direct administrative and regulatory action even when domestic law is silent.
4. Canada – Suresh v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2002] 1 S.C.R. 3
Context:
A Sri Lankan man facing deportation on security grounds argued that removal would expose him to torture.
Globalization Aspect:
The case addressed obligations under the UN Convention Against Torture and international human rights law.
Holding:
The Supreme Court of Canada held that deportation to torture is presumptively unconstitutional and contrary to Canada’s international obligations.
Impact on Administrative Law:
This decision confirmed that international human rights norms constrain administrative discretion, especially in immigration and deportation.
5. EU – Kadi v. Council and Commission (Kadi I), Case C-402/05 P (2008)
Context:
Mr. Kadi, an EU resident, was listed as a terrorist by the UN Security Council and subjected to asset freezes by the EU without a hearing.
Globalization Aspect:
The case addressed conflicts between international obligations (UN sanctions) and EU fundamental rights protections.
Holding:
The European Court of Justice annulled the EU regulation implementing the UN sanction, stating that EU administrative action must comply with EU fundamental rights, even when implementing international law.
Impact on Administrative Law:
This case confirmed that domestic and regional courts can review international administrative actions for compatibility with constitutional and fundamental rights, even at the risk of defying global institutions.
6. Australia – Plaintiff M61/2010E v. Commonwealth of Australia [2010] HCA 41
Context:
Asylum seekers were placed in offshore processing under special administrative procedures.
Globalization Aspect:
The procedures aimed to comply with international refugee law, particularly the 1951 Refugee Convention, but the applicants alleged procedural unfairness.
Holding:
The High Court held that applicants were entitled to procedural fairness, even under expedited processes, and that administrative decisions had to comply with both domestic and international standards.
Impact on Administrative Law:
The case reinforced the idea that global refugee standards influence domestic administrative procedures and highlighted the courts’ role in ensuring due process.
IV. Summary of Key Impacts by Case
| Case | Jurisdiction | International Influence | Key Principle Affected |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hamdan v. Rumsfeld | USA | Geneva Conventions | Due process in administrative tribunals |
| Daly v. Secretary of State | UK | ECHR | Proportionality and privacy in administrative decisions |
| Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan | India | CEDAW | Use of international soft law to guide domestic regulation |
| Suresh v. Canada | Canada | UNCAT | Limits on deportation and discretion |
| Kadi I | EU | UN Security Council | Fundamental rights override international mandates |
| M61/2010E | Australia | Refugee Convention | Fairness in immigration processing |
V. Concluding Observations
Globalization is reshaping administrative law by embedding international human rights norms into domestic decision-making.
Courts are increasingly holding administrative bodies accountable to both domestic and international legal standards.
There is a tension between respecting international obligations and preserving constitutional protections — seen most clearly in Kadi.
The rise of global administrative law reflects a growing need to regulate the actions of transnational regulators and international agencies.
RELATED Blog
0 comments