Rule of Law and its Application in India
Rule of Law and Its Application in India
1. What is the Rule of Law?
The Rule of Law is a fundamental legal principle stating that:
Every individual, including those in government, is subject to the law.
No one is above the law.
Laws are clear, publicized, stable, and applied evenly.
The law protects fundamental rights and freedoms.
The judiciary is independent and impartial to enforce the law.
This concept ensures fairness, equality, and accountability in governance.
2. Importance of Rule of Law in India
It protects citizens from arbitrariness and despotism.
It ensures that laws govern the country, not individuals.
It is the foundation of democracy and constitutional governance.
It enforces the Supremacy of the Constitution.
It empowers the judiciary to review legislative and executive actions.
3. Application of Rule of Law in India
In India, the Rule of Law is enshrined in the Constitution through:
Article 14: Equality before the law and equal protection of laws.
Articles 21: Protection of life and personal liberty.
Judicial Review: Power of the courts to invalidate laws and actions inconsistent with the Constitution.
Separation of Powers: Checks and balances between Legislature, Executive, and Judiciary.
Landmark Cases Illustrating Rule of Law in India
Case 1: Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)
Issue: Whether Parliament can amend the Constitution’s basic structure.
Judgment: Parliament cannot alter the Constitution's basic structure.
Application of Rule of Law: This case established that even Parliament must operate within the limits of the Constitution, affirming constitutional supremacy over arbitrary legislative actions.
Case 2: Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)
Issue: Whether the government could impound a passport without a fair procedure.
Judgment: The right to personal liberty includes the right to travel abroad, and any deprivation must be by a just, fair, and reasonable procedure.
Application of Rule of Law: This case expanded procedural fairness and due process, preventing arbitrary executive action.
Case 3: S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1981) (The Judges Transfer Case)
Issue: Independence of the judiciary and transfer of judges.
Judgment: Affirmed the independence of the judiciary from executive interference.
Application of Rule of Law: Protected judicial independence, a key pillar of the Rule of Law, ensuring courts are free from political pressure.
Case 4: Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997)
Issue: Lack of legal framework to address sexual harassment at the workplace.
Judgment: The Court issued guidelines (Vishaka Guidelines) to prevent sexual harassment.
Application of Rule of Law: Showed judicial activism filling legislative gaps to protect fundamental rights and uphold dignity, reinforcing fairness and equality.
Case 5: Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015)
Issue: Validity of Section 66A of the IT Act that criminalized offensive online speech.
Judgment: Section 66A was struck down for being vague and unconstitutional.
Application of Rule of Law: Ensured laws are clear and not arbitrary, protecting freedom of speech and preventing misuse of power.
Case 6: I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu (2007)
Issue: Validity of laws placed under the Ninth Schedule immune from judicial review.
Judgment: Laws after 1973 under Ninth Schedule can be reviewed if they violate fundamental rights.
Application of Rule of Law: Strengthened judicial oversight, ensuring laws do not override fundamental rights arbitrarily.
Case 7: ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976) (The Habeas Corpus Case)
Issue: Suspension of fundamental rights during Emergency.
Judgment: Court controversially held that even the right to life can be suspended during Emergency.
Significance: The case showed a failure in the application of Rule of Law, with later judgments and constitutional amendments (post-Emergency) strengthening protections against such arbitrary state action.
Summary: How the Rule of Law is Applied in India
| Aspect | Explanation | Case Example |
|---|---|---|
| Constitutional Supremacy | Constitution is the supreme law | Kesavananda Bharati |
| Protection of Fundamental Rights | Laws must protect rights, not violate them | Maneka Gandhi, I.R. Coelho |
| Judicial Independence | Courts must be free from executive control | S.P. Gupta |
| Equality Before Law | Equal treatment of all individuals | Vishaka |
| Non-Arbitrariness of Laws | Laws must be clear, fair, and just | Shreya Singhal |
Final Notes:
The Rule of Law in India ensures that governance is lawful, just, and accountable. While some judgments have tested the principle (e.g., ADM Jabalpur), the judiciary overall has played a pivotal role in upholding it. The Supreme Court, through its evolving jurisprudence, continuously guards against arbitrariness, protecting democratic rights and constitutional values.
RELATED Blog
0 comments