Evaluating the role of administrative Law in ensuring equitable vaccine distribution
Introduction
Administrative law governs the actions of public authorities and ensures that their decisions are lawful, fair, and reasonable. During the COVID-19 pandemic, administrative law played a crucial role in overseeing the equitable distribution of vaccines, ensuring that public health policies adhered to constitutional principles and protected citizens' rights.
Judicial Oversight in Vaccine Distribution
1. In Re: Distribution of Essential Supplies and Services During Pandemic (2021)
Context: The Supreme Court took suo motu cognizance of issues related to the management of the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the distribution of essential supplies, including vaccines.
Key Findings:
Differential Pricing: The Court expressed concern over the differential pricing of vaccines by private hospitals, which could lead to inequitable access for economically disadvantaged groups.
Digital Divide: It highlighted the challenges posed by the digital divide, which affected the registration process for vaccination, particularly for rural and elderly populations.
Transparency: The Court emphasized the need for transparency in vaccine procurement and distribution processes to ensure accountability.
Outcome: The Court directed the Union and State Governments to ensure that vaccines were provided free of cost to all citizens, particularly targeting vulnerable populations. It also mandated the publication of data related to vaccine availability and distribution.
2. West Bengal's Petition for Uniform Vaccine Pricing
Context: The State of West Bengal approached the Supreme Court, challenging the differential pricing mechanism for COVID-19 vaccines.
Key Arguments:
Uniform Pricing: West Bengal argued that a uniform vaccine pricing policy was essential to prevent disparities in access between states and within different socio-economic groups.
Central Procurement: The state contended that the central government should procure all vaccines and distribute them to states free of cost to ensure equitable access.
Judicial Response: The Court observed that the differential pricing policy could potentially infringe upon the right to health under Article 21 of the Constitution. It directed the central government to reconsider the pricing policy and ensure that vaccines were made available to all states at affordable rates.
3. Revival of Public Sector Vaccine Units
Context: Amid vaccine shortages, a petition was filed in the Supreme Court urging the revival of public sector vaccine manufacturing units to increase production capacity.
Key Arguments:
Utilization of Existing Infrastructure: The petitioners highlighted that existing public sector units had the infrastructure and expertise to produce vaccines but were underutilized.
Public Health Imperative: They argued that reviving these units was crucial to meet the urgent demand for vaccines and ensure equitable distribution.
Judicial Response: The Court directed the Union Government to explore the possibility of reviving public sector vaccine manufacturing units and to take necessary steps to augment vaccine production.
4. Accountability in Vaccine Administration
Context: The Bombay High Court addressed a case where a doctor and nurse were accused of administering an expired vaccine to an infant.
Key Findings:
Due Process: The Court emphasized the importance of following due process in administrative actions, including the necessity of expert medical opinions before initiating criminal proceedings against healthcare professionals.
Absence of Negligence: It was found that the infant did not suffer any adverse effects, and the vaccine manufacturer confirmed the safety of the vaccine post-expiry if stored properly.
Outcome: The Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings, underscoring the need for administrative actions to be based on sound reasoning and evidence.
Role of Administrative Law in Ensuring Equitable Vaccine Distribution
Ensuring Compliance with Constitutional Rights
Administrative law ensures that public health policies, including vaccine distribution, comply with constitutional rights, particularly the right to health under Article 21.
Promoting Transparency and Accountability
Judicial oversight ensures that administrative decisions related to vaccine distribution are transparent and that authorities are held accountable for their actions.
Addressing Disparities in Access
Courts have intervened to address disparities in vaccine access, ensuring that vulnerable populations are not excluded from vaccination programs.
Guiding Administrative Actions
Judicial decisions provide guidance to administrative authorities on best practices for equitable vaccine distribution, including considerations of pricing, accessibility, and infrastructure utilization.
Conclusion
Administrative law has played a pivotal role in ensuring the equitable distribution of vaccines in India during the COVID-19 pandemic. Through judicial oversight, courts have ensured that administrative actions align with constitutional principles, promote transparency, and address disparities in access. The evolving jurisprudence in this area underscores the importance of administrative law in safeguarding public health and ensuring justice in times of crisis.
RELATED Blog
0 comments