Judicial control of administrative rule-making in India
⚖️ Judicial Control of Administrative Rule-Making in India
🔹 Introduction
Administrative rule-making involves the creation of rules, regulations, or subsidiary legislation by administrative agencies or authorities under powers delegated by the legislature. These rules carry the force of law and are essential for effective governance.
However, administrative authorities do not have unlimited power to make rules. The judiciary exercises control to ensure that such rule-making:
Remains within the scope of delegated authority (no ultra vires rules)
Is consistent with constitutional provisions and parent statutes
Respects fundamental rights and principles of natural justice
Is not arbitrary, unreasonable, or discriminatory
This judicial control preserves the Rule of Law and prevents administrative arbitrariness.
🔹 Types of Judicial Review in Rule-Making
Delegated Legislation must conform to the parent Act — no exceeding powers.
Procedural compliance — rules must be made following prescribed procedures.
Substantive reasonableness — rules must be fair and not arbitrary.
Constitutional validity — rules must not violate constitutional rights.
Rules cannot override primary legislation.
🧾 Important Case Laws Explaining Judicial Control
1. Bhagwati v. Union of India (1962)
Facts:
Challenge to the validity of rules made by the government under the Essential Commodities Act.
Held:
The Supreme Court held that delegated legislation is subject to judicial review and courts will strike down rules that go beyond the authority granted by the statute.
Significance:
Established that delegated legislation cannot exceed the limits laid down in the parent Act.
2. A.K. Roy v. Union of India (1982)
Facts:
The government issued rules under Preventive Detention Act; their validity was challenged for being arbitrary.
Held:
The Court said that delegated legislation must be reasonable and must not violate fundamental rights, even if made under a valid statute.
Significance:
Highlighted that judicial review extends to the reasonableness and constitutionality of administrative rules.
3. M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (1987) (Oleum Gas Leak Case)
Facts:
The government issued environmental rules under the Environment Protection Act.
Held:
The Court emphasized the need for strict compliance with statutory mandates and insisted that rules must not only conform to the parent Act but must also protect fundamental rights such as the right to life.
Significance:
Asserted judicial control to ensure environmental regulations comply with constitutional safeguards.
4. State of Rajasthan v. Union of India (1977)
Facts:
The validity of rules framed under the Rajasthan Tenancy Act was challenged.
Held:
The Court stated that rules that are ultra vires the enabling Act or violate constitutional provisions are liable to be declared void.
Significance:
Confirmed the ultra vires doctrine as a basis for judicial control.
5. All India Federation of Tax Practitioners v. Union of India (2004)
Facts:
Challenge to rules framed under the Income Tax Act.
Held:
The Court held that rules that impose new obligations or confer powers inconsistent with the parent Act are ultra vires and invalid.
Significance:
Reiterated that delegated legislation must stay within the ambit of the parent statute.
🔍 Key Principles Derived from Case Law
| Principle | Explanation | Landmark Cases |
|---|---|---|
| Ultra Vires Doctrine | Rules must be within the powers delegated by the statute | Bhagwati v. Union of India, State of Rajasthan |
| Reasonableness and Non-Arbitrariness | Rules must be fair, just, and reasonable, not arbitrary | A.K. Roy v. Union of India |
| Constitutional Validity | Rules must not violate fundamental rights | M.C. Mehta v. Union of India |
| Procedural Compliance | Rules must follow prescribed procedures | All India Federation of Tax Practitioners v. Union of India |
| No Contradiction with Parent Act | Rules cannot override or contradict primary legislation | All India Federation of Tax Practitioners v. Union of India |
✅ Conclusion
The judiciary plays a crucial role in controlling administrative rule-making in India by ensuring that:
Delegated legislation is within the scope of authority.
It respects constitutional mandates and fundamental rights.
It is reasonable and non-arbitrary.
Procedural formalities are strictly adhered to.
This judicial control acts as a check on administrative overreach and protects citizens from unfair or unlawful rules.
RELATED Blog
0 comments