Incorporation by reference in rulemaking
🔍 What is Incorporation by Reference (IBR)?
Incorporation by Reference is a legal drafting technique that allows a rule or regulation to refer to materials not contained in the text of the regulation, but which are legally enforceable as if they were included. These may include:
Technical standards (e.g., ISO, ASTM)
Industry manuals
Codes of practice
Scientific data or reports
This mechanism helps simplify regulations, avoid duplication, and defer to expertise in technical subjects without overloading the regulatory text.
✅ Key Legal Features of IBR:
Authority – Agencies must have statutory authority to incorporate by reference.
Accessibility – The incorporated materials must be reasonably available to the public.
Clarity – The reference must be clear, specific, and unambiguous.
Due Process – Regulated parties should be able to access and understand what is required of them.
Judicial Review – Courts can examine whether the incorporation was proper, accessible, and fair.
📚 CASE LAW ANALYSIS – More than Five Key Cases
1. American Radio Relay League, Inc. v. FCC (2008)
Jurisdiction: United States Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Citation: 524 F.3d 227
Facts:
The FCC adopted a rule that incorporated portions of a technical study by reference, but did not make the full study available to the public during the comment period.
Issue:
Was it proper for the FCC to incorporate by reference materials that were not fully accessible during rulemaking?
Holding:
The court held that the FCC violated the notice-and-comment requirement of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
Material incorporated by reference must be accessible during the public comment period.
Significance:
Establishes that public access to referenced materials is essential.
Ensures transparency and procedural fairness.
2. Kennecott Utah Copper Corp. v. Department of the Interior (1998)
Jurisdiction: United States Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Citation: 88 F.3d 1191
Facts:
The Department of the Interior issued environmental regulations incorporating technical standards by reference (not republished in full).
Issue:
Could the agency rely on IBR without violating public access and procedural due process?
Holding:
The court upheld the IBR, finding that the referenced standards were publicly available and thus met legal requirements.
However, it cautioned agencies to ensure ongoing access.
Significance:
Reinforces the legitimacy of IBR, but with a duty to maintain accessibility.
Highlights judicial balancing of administrative efficiency with fairness.
3. United States v. Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Co. (2002)
Jurisdiction: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Citation: 245 F. Supp. 2d 994
Facts:
The EPA incorporated air emission measurement techniques by reference into Clean Air Act regulations.
Issue:
Could enforcement be based on standards that were not reprinted in the regulation?
Holding:
The court upheld enforcement, noting that the referenced standards were clearly identified and publicly available.
Emphasized that incorporation by reference was a valid legislative technique.
Significance:
Confirmed that IBR materials carry full legal force, if done properly.
Validated IBR as a compliance and enforcement tool.
4. City of Portland v. EPA (2003)
Jurisdiction: Ninth Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals
Citation: 507 F.3d 706
Facts:
EPA issued water quality regulations incorporating technical documents and methodology by reference.
Issue:
Did IBR violate public participation rights under environmental statutes?
Holding:
The court upheld the rule, stating the documents were sufficiently available during rulemaking.
The agency complied with notice-and-comment requirements.
Significance:
Affirms that timing of access to incorporated materials is crucial.
Supports use of expert documents through IBR, if public input is preserved.
5. Building Officials & Code Administrators (BOCA) v. Code Technology, Inc. (1995)
Jurisdiction: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Citation: 628 F.2d 730
Facts:
Dispute over copyright in materials incorporated by reference into building codes adopted by state governments.
Issue:
Can privately copyrighted materials become public law when incorporated into regulations?
Holding:
The court recognized that once a document is incorporated by reference into law, its contents have the force of law.
Raised concerns over copyright vs. public access.
Significance:
Important in the debate over proprietary standards used in regulation.
Suggested need for balancing copyright protection with transparency.
6. National Electrical Manufacturers Association v. U.S. Department of Energy (2021)
Jurisdiction: D.C. Circuit Court
Facts:
The DOE incorporated by reference energy efficiency testing standards developed by industry associations.
Court's Reasoning:
Courts held that referencing industry-created standards is acceptable as long as the public has access and the rule is sufficiently specific.
Noted the potential concern that some standards may be behind a paywall.
Significance:
Points to ongoing concern about economic accessibility of IBR materials.
Agencies may have to provide free or low-cost access to ensure enforceability.
🧩 Key Legal Principles from Case Law
| Legal Principle | Case(s) Supporting | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Accessibility Requirement | Juliana, Kennecott, City of Portland | Public must be able to review incorporated materials |
| Due Process and Public Participation | Juliana, City of Portland | Lack of access violates APA’s notice-and-comment |
| Legal Status of IBR Materials | Southern Indiana Gas, BOCA | Once incorporated, material has force of law |
| Clarity and Specificity | DOE Case, Kennecott | Vague or unclear references can be invalid |
| Copyright and Proprietary Concerns | BOCA | Incorporated documents may lose copyright protection if they become binding law |
Conclusion
Incorporation by Reference is a practical and legally accepted method of rulemaking used globally.
It is especially relevant in technical and environmental regulation, where standards evolve outside of legislative frameworks.
Courts uphold IBR when it respects transparency, accessibility, and procedural fairness.
Increasingly, courts are scrutinizing whether referenced documents are accessible and understandable to the public.
As regulatory complexity grows, so does the need to balance administrative efficiency with democratic accountability.
RELATED Blog
0 comments