Growth of Administrative Law in Pakistan
Administrative Law is the body of law that governs the activities of administrative agencies of government, including regulations, decisions, and actions taken by government bodies in their various administrative capacities. It plays a crucial role in ensuring that governmental powers are exercised within the rule of law, respecting the rights of citizens and preventing the misuse of power by state authorities.
In Pakistan, the growth of Administrative Law has been shaped by the country’s legal history, its relationship with constitutional law, the judiciary's evolving role, and the development of a civil service apparatus. This growth has been influenced by judicial activism, administrative reforms, and the need to balance executive power with fundamental rights.
1. Evolution and Historical Development of Administrative Law in Pakistan
The roots of administrative law in Pakistan can be traced back to British colonial rule. Many of the administrative laws, principles, and structures were inherited from the colonial period, primarily from the Indian subcontinent. These laws were largely influenced by the British model of public administration, which emphasized executive control over administration, judicial review, and principles of natural justice.
After Pakistan's independence in 1947, the country continued to rely on the inherited legal structures for administrative governance. However, as the country faced political instability, military rule, and significant shifts in governance models, the development of administrative law became an essential tool to ensure accountability, transparency, and the rule of law in governmental operations.
2. Key Components of Administrative Law in Pakistan
i. Delegated Legislation
Delegated legislation refers to laws made by an executive authority under powers granted to it by Parliament or a similar legislative body. This includes regulations, orders, and rules passed by government agencies or ministries.
In Pakistan, delegated legislation became widespread after the Constitution of 1973 came into effect, which granted significant powers to the federal and provincial governments. Various ordinances, rules, and regulations were passed to carry out policies and the implementation of laws.
Example:
The Income Tax Ordinance of 2001 is an example of delegated legislation, where the government has the authority to make rules and orders under the law to implement tax-related policies.
ii. Judicial Review of Administrative Action
One of the most significant developments in administrative law in Pakistan has been the growing role of the judiciary in reviewing administrative actions. The judicial review process allows courts to examine whether the executive actions are consistent with the law and whether fundamental rights have been violated.
The Supreme Court of Pakistan has developed an active role in protecting individuals' rights from arbitrary or unlawful executive actions. In particular, judicial review ensures that government decisions are not arbitrary and follow the principles of due process and natural justice.
iii. Principles of Natural Justice
Natural justice has been a cornerstone of administrative law in Pakistan. Natural justice refers to the procedural fairness required in decision-making processes, especially in administrative matters that affect individuals' rights.
The two key principles of natural justice are:
The right to be heard (audi alteram partem): Affected individuals must be given an opportunity to present their case.
The rule against bias (nemo judex in causa sua): No one should be a judge in their own cause, i.e., decision-makers should be impartial.
Over time, natural justice principles have been expanded in Pakistan, particularly through judicial interpretations that have enhanced individuals' protection against arbitrary administrative decisions.
iv. Accountability Mechanisms
The establishment of institutions like the Ombudsman and the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) in Pakistan further promoted administrative law. These bodies are designed to investigate and address complaints against maladministration, corruption, and misuse of power by public officials.
The Public Service Commission (PSC) also plays a role in overseeing recruitment and appointments to ensure that these processes adhere to the law and are fair and transparent.
3. Key Stages in the Growth of Administrative Law in Pakistan
i. Post-Independence Period (1947–1970)
After gaining independence in 1947, Pakistan inherited a system of administrative law from colonial India, which included the Government of India Act, 1935 and other laws. During this period, Pakistan’s legal system was primarily based on English common law principles, but the system was often characterized by weak checks and balances on executive power.
The administrative apparatus was established under the Civil Services Act of 1973, which laid down the procedures for civil service appointments and administrative governance.
ii. The Martial Law Era (1977–1988)
The military rule under General Zia-ul-Haq (1977-1988) brought about significant changes, both in the political structure and administrative law. The introduction of Ordinances under martial law allowed the executive to bypass the legislature in making important decisions, undermining parliamentary democracy and judicial review.
However, the judiciary also started to develop more robust judicial review mechanisms, especially with the advent of judicial activism in the 1980s. The Supreme Court began to take a more active role in ensuring that administrative actions were subject to review.
iii. The 1990s and Beyond
The 1990s marked a period of more active judicial review, with several important decisions that expanded the scope of administrative law. The judiciary, especially the Supreme Court, began to assert its authority in reviewing executive decisions. Landmark cases included the Benazir Bhutto vs. Federation of Pakistan (1998) case, which emphasized the supremacy of law and judicial review over executive actions.
The Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions in the 1990s and beyond highlighted that even actions taken by administrative agencies were subject to the scrutiny of courts, particularly when they involved the violation of rights or the breach of natural justice.
4. Key Case Law in the Growth of Administrative Law in Pakistan
i. The Al-Jehad Trust Case (1996)
The Al-Jehad Trust case (1996) is a landmark case in the development of administrative law in Pakistan. The Supreme Court ruled that administrative decisions that affect fundamental rights must follow the principles of natural justice. This case set a precedent for the judiciary to actively intervene in administrative actions, ensuring that decisions affecting individuals are fair, transparent, and just.
ii. The Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Case (1979)
In the Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto case (1979), the Supreme Court held that the executive, despite its powers, could not act in violation of the Constitution. This case was pivotal in reinforcing the principle that executive actions, even under military regimes, are subject to constitutional scrutiny.
iii. The Asghar Khan Case (2012)
In the Asghar Khan case (2012), the Supreme Court ordered the Pakistan Army and intelligence agencies to be held accountable for their interference in political processes. This judgment highlighted the role of judicial review in holding executive agencies accountable for abuse of power and administrative decisions that affect public life.
iv. The PCO Judges Case (2007)
The PCO Judges case (2007) involved a legal challenge against judges who had taken an oath under the Provisional Constitutional Order (PCO), which was imposed by the then-President General Pervez Musharraf. The Supreme Court held that any administrative action or decision taken by authorities under the PCO was unconstitutional and illegal. This case marked a significant assertion of judicial independence and the importance of administrative law in ensuring that all actions are taken in conformity with the Constitution.
5. Conclusion:
The growth of Administrative Law in Pakistan has been marked by a continuous evolution of judicial oversight, the establishment of institutions for accountability, and the expansion of principles of natural justice. The Supreme Court of Pakistan has played a critical role in defining the boundaries of executive power and ensuring that administrative agencies act in accordance with the law and constitutional principles.
As Pakistan moves forward, administrative law will continue to evolve as a crucial mechanism to safeguard the rights of individuals and ensure that the actions of government bodies do not exceed their legal powers. Judicial review, transparency, and accountability remain central to the development of administrative law in Pakistan, as the country navigates challenges in governance, executive power, and civil rights protection.
RELATED Blog
comments