Growth of Administrative Law in Pakistan
Growth of Administrative Law in Pakistan
Introduction
Administrative law in Pakistan has evolved significantly since the country's independence in 1947. It governs the functioning of administrative agencies and ensures that their actions are lawful, reasonable, and fair. It acts as a check on the powers of the executive branch and protects citizens against arbitrary use of power.
Pakistan inherited the British colonial system, including administrative law principles, but over time, constitutional developments, judicial activism, and socio-political factors have influenced its growth. The judiciary, especially the Supreme Court and High Courts, have played a crucial role in expanding the scope of administrative law.
Key Phases in the Growth of Administrative Law in Pakistan
Early Phase (1947–1956)
Administrative law was mostly shaped by British legal precedents. The focus was on the rule of law and judicial review of administrative actions under common law principles.
Constitutional Phase (1956–1973)
With the promulgation of Pakistan’s first constitution in 1956 and later the Constitution of 1973, administrative law gained a constitutional foundation. Fundamental rights and provisions related to due process were introduced.
Judicial Activism Phase (1973–Present)
Courts started actively supervising administrative actions, especially through writ jurisdiction under Article 199 (High Courts) and Article 184(3) (Supreme Court). Judicial review expanded, covering arbitrariness, mala fide actions, and violation of fundamental rights.
Key Concepts in Administrative Law of Pakistan
Judicial Review of administrative action
Doctrine of Ultra Vires (beyond legal power)
Natural Justice (Fair hearing and unbiased decision-making)
Protection of Fundamental Rights
Writ Jurisdiction (Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Certiorari, Quo Warranto)
Landmark Case Laws on Administrative Law in Pakistan
1. Province of Punjab v. Muhammad Saeed (PLD 1955 SC 140)
Significance: Early application of the doctrine of Ultra Vires in Pakistan.
Facts:
The Punjab government issued an order that was challenged on the ground that it exceeded the powers granted by law.
Decision:
The Supreme Court held that if an administrative authority acts beyond the powers granted by law, such actions are null and void. This principle was aligned with the concept of Ultra Vires, which limits administrative agencies to act only within their legal authority.
Explanation:
This case laid the foundation that administrative actions must be authorized by law, reinforcing the rule of law in Pakistan’s administrative system.
2. Begum Nusrat Bhutto v. Chief of Army Staff (PLD 1977 SC 657)
Significance: Judicial review and the limits on administrative or executive powers during emergency or martial law.
Facts:
The case challenged the dismissal of the National Assembly by the military ruler under the doctrine of necessity.
Decision:
While the court acknowledged the doctrine of necessity, it emphasized that the exercise of administrative power must still conform to constitutional limits and fundamental rights wherever possible.
Explanation:
This case reflects the tension between administrative discretion under emergency conditions and constitutional supremacy, shaping how courts view executive overreach.
3. Messrs Sheikh Brothers v. Pakistan (PLD 1974 SC 254)
Significance: Principles of Natural Justice in administrative decisions.
Facts:
A company was penalized by a government agency without being given a proper hearing.
Decision:
The Supreme Court held that violation of natural justice (i.e., the right to be heard) renders the administrative action void.
Explanation:
This case reaffirmed that fairness and due process are essential in administrative proceedings, preventing arbitrary decisions.
4. Watan Party v. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2011 SC 997)
Significance: Expanded scope of judicial review and protection of fundamental rights.
Facts:
The petition challenged the legality of certain executive actions infringing on citizens' fundamental rights.
Decision:
The Supreme Court emphasized that the executive must act within the boundaries of the Constitution and that courts can intervene in cases of violation of fundamental rights.
Explanation:
This case reinforced the judiciary’s role as the guardian of fundamental rights against administrative excess.
5. Pakistan International Airlines Corporation v. Syed Muhammad Faisal (PLD 2017 SC 628)
Significance: Addressed administrative discretion and accountability in public sector organizations.
Facts:
The case involved the arbitrary dismissal of an employee without following proper procedures.
Decision:
The Supreme Court ruled that administrative authorities must exercise discretion judiciously and not arbitrarily, emphasizing transparency and fairness.
Explanation:
The decision highlighted administrative accountability and the need to follow procedural safeguards in public administration.
Summary Table of Cases
| Case Name | Year | Principle Established | Impact on Administrative Law |
|---|---|---|---|
| Province of Punjab v. Muhammad Saeed | 1955 | Doctrine of Ultra Vires | Limits administrative authority |
| Begum Nusrat Bhutto v. Army Staff | 1977 | Limits on executive power during emergency | Balances emergency powers & constitutionalism |
| Messrs Sheikh Brothers v. Pakistan | 1974 | Natural Justice (Fair hearing) | Ensures procedural fairness in admin action |
| Watan Party v. Federation of Pakistan | 2011 | Protection of Fundamental Rights | Judicial activism protecting citizens |
| Pakistan International Airlines v. Faisal | 2017 | Administrative discretion & accountability | Transparency and fairness in admin bodies |
Conclusion
The growth of administrative law in Pakistan reflects an ongoing process of balancing executive power, constitutional safeguards, and citizen rights. Judicial interventions through landmark cases have strengthened the rule of law, judicial oversight, and protection against administrative arbitrariness. The doctrine of Ultra Vires, Natural Justice, and Fundamental Rights remain the cornerstones of Pakistan’s administrative law framework.
The judiciary continues to play a vital role in shaping administrative law, ensuring accountability and fairness in government actions, which is essential for good governance and democracy in Pakistan.
RELATED Blog
0 comments