Publication requirements of delegated legislation
Publication Requirements of Delegated Legislation
What is Delegated Legislation?
Delegated legislation (also called subsidiary or subordinate legislation) is law made by an individual or body other than Parliament but with the authority of Parliament. Parliament delegates legislative power to government ministers, local authorities, or other bodies to create detailed rules, regulations, orders, or by-laws.
Why Publication is Important?
Publication of delegated legislation is crucial because:
It ensures transparency and allows the public to be aware of the law.
It enables legal certainty; people cannot be bound by laws they do not know.
It facilitates accountability of the delegated authority.
The Requirement of Publication
For delegated legislation to be legally effective and enforceable, it usually must be properly published or made accessible to the public. This is often a statutory requirement, meaning the parent act (enabling legislation) may specify how and when the delegated legislation should be published.
Failure to comply with publication requirements may lead to the legislation being declared invalid or ultra vires (beyond powers).
Key Cases on Publication Requirements of Delegated Legislation
1. Aylesbury Mushrooms Ltd v. Minister of Labour (1946) AC 219
Facts: The Minister of Labour made regulations under the authority of the Agricultural Marketing Act 1931. The regulations required consultation with a specific committee before making the rules, but this consultation was not done.
Issue: Whether the regulations were valid without the required consultation.
Held: The regulations were invalid because the procedural requirement of consultation, mandated by the enabling Act, was not followed. Though this case focuses more on procedure than publication, it sets the principle that conditions laid down in the enabling Act (like publication or consultation) must be complied with strictly.
Significance: This case illustrates that procedural steps (including publication) in delegated legislation are mandatory.
2. R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union (1995) 2 AC 513
Facts: The Home Secretary had promised to introduce a compensation scheme for injured firefighters. The scheme was not introduced, but the Secretary used delegated powers to make regulations that were never properly published.
Issue: Whether the failure to publish the regulations properly made them invalid.
Held: The court held that the Secretary’s failure to properly implement and publish the scheme frustrated Parliament’s intention.
Significance: Although this case primarily addresses the failure to implement policy, it underscores the principle that delegated legislation must be properly enacted, including proper publication.
3. Parker v. South Eastern Railway Co. (1877) 2 CPD 416
Facts: A railway company issued tickets containing terms and conditions printed on the back. The passenger was unaware of the terms because they were not made sufficiently available.
Issue: Whether the passenger was bound by the terms which were not sufficiently brought to his notice.
Held: The court held the passenger was not bound because the terms were not reasonably brought to the passenger’s attention.
Significance: Although not a case about delegated legislation directly, it establishes an important principle about notice/publication and legal enforceability—if laws (or conditions) are not properly made known, they cannot bind individuals.
4. R v. Registrar of Restrictive Practices, ex parte Annabel's (1981) 1 WLR 938
Facts: The Registrar failed to publish a notification of an investigation as required by the Restrictive Trade Practices Act 1976.
Issue: Whether the failure to publish the notice invalidated the investigation.
Held: The failure to publish the notification invalidated the investigation because publication was a mandatory requirement to inform affected parties.
Significance: This case stresses that publication is an essential procedural requirement to give validity to delegated legislation or associated procedures.
5. London and Clydeside Estates Ltd v Aberdeen District Council (1983) 45 P & CR 423
Facts: The Aberdeen District Council made orders under delegated powers but failed to publish them properly.
Issue: Whether the orders were valid despite lack of proper publication.
Held: The court ruled that improper publication rendered the orders invalid.
Significance: Emphasizes that publication requirements must be complied with for delegated legislation to be legally effective.
Summary of Key Points:
Publication is a procedural requirement for delegated legislation to be valid.
Failure to publish or properly notify can make the delegated legislation ultra vires.
Publication allows the public and affected parties to know their rights and obligations.
The exact form and manner of publication will depend on the parent Act.
Courts are strict about compliance with publication requirements (see Aylesbury Mushrooms, Annabel’s).
RELATED Blog
0 comments