Concept and scope of administrative law in Finland
Concept and Scope of Administrative Law in Finland
I. Concept of Administrative Law in Finland
What is Administrative Law?
Administrative law in Finland governs the organization, powers, duties, and procedures of public administration.
It regulates how public authorities exercise their power and make decisions affecting individuals and organizations.
Ensures that administrative actions comply with law, respect fundamental rights, and adhere to principles like fairness, transparency, and proportionality.
Core Features:
Rule of Law: All administrative acts must be based on legal authority.
Accountability: Authorities must justify their decisions.
Procedural Fairness: Citizens have rights to be heard and informed.
Judicial Review: Courts can review administrative decisions.
Sources of Administrative Law in Finland:
Constitution of Finland (1999): Guarantees fundamental rights and limits administrative powers.
Administrative Procedure Act (434/2003): Main procedural law for administrative decision-making.
Specific laws: Sectoral administrative regulations.
Case Law: Finnish courts’ interpretations guide application.
II. Scope of Administrative Law in Finland
Administrative law in Finland covers:
Organization of Administration: Structure and powers of agencies.
Administrative Procedure: How decisions are made, including notice and hearing.
Legal Remedies: Appeals, annulments, and enforcement.
Public Service Law: Rules governing civil servants.
Accountability and Transparency: Access to documents and information.
Protection of Rights: Balancing public interest and individual rights.
III. Key Finnish Case Laws on Administrative Law
1. Supreme Administrative Court of Finland, KHO:2005:75
Issue: Legality of municipal zoning decision.
Facts: A municipal council passed a zoning plan affecting private landowners.
Judgment: The court held the decision must comply with the principle of proportionality and public interest must be balanced against private rights.
Significance: Reinforced proportionality principle in administrative decision-making.
Principle: Administrative acts must not be excessive and must serve legitimate objectives.
2. Supreme Administrative Court, KHO:2013:68
Issue: Administrative procedure and the right to be heard.
Facts: A public authority made a decision affecting a party without providing them an opportunity to comment.
Judgment: The court annulled the decision citing violation of the right to be heard.
Significance: Affirmed the fundamental principle of audi alteram partem (hear the other side).
Principle: Fair procedure requires prior notice and possibility to present views.
3. Supreme Administrative Court, KHO:2010:47
Issue: Review of discretionary power in granting licenses.
Facts: A license application was rejected without clear reasons.
Judgment: The court emphasized that discretion must be exercised transparently and with sufficient reasoning.
Significance: Highlighted the importance of reasoned decisions in administrative law.
Principle: Authorities must provide adequate explanations for their decisions.
4. Supreme Administrative Court, KHO:2016:41
Issue: Access to administrative documents.
Facts: An applicant requested public documents which were denied by the authority.
Judgment: The court held that transparency and access to information are fundamental, barring specific exceptions.
Significance: Strengthened principle of openness and transparency in administration.
Principle: Public must have access to government information unless law provides specific grounds for restriction.
5. Supreme Court of Finland, KKO:2012:15
Issue: Judicial review of administrative penalties.
Facts: A business was penalized by an administrative agency.
Judgment: The court held that administrative penalties are subject to judicial review and must be proportional.
Significance: Emphasized judicial oversight over administrative sanctions.
Principle: Checks and balances on administrative enforcement powers.
IV. Summary Table of Administrative Law Principles from Finnish Case Law
| Case | Issue | Principle Established |
|---|---|---|
| KHO:2005:75 | Zoning decision legality | Proportionality and balance of public/private interests |
| KHO:2013:68 | Right to be heard | Audi alteram partem - fair hearing |
| KHO:2010:47 | Discretionary decisions | Requirement of reasoned decisions |
| KHO:2016:41 | Access to documents | Transparency and openness |
| KKO:2012:15 | Administrative penalties | Judicial review and proportionality of sanctions |
V. Conclusion
Administrative law in Finland plays a crucial role in ensuring government accountability, protecting citizens’ rights, and promoting good governance. Finnish courts, particularly the Supreme Administrative Court, have developed strong jurisprudence emphasizing:
Procedural fairness (right to be heard)
Transparency and openness
Reasoned decision-making
Proportionality in administrative acts
Judicial oversight on administrative discretion and sanctions
This comprehensive framework upholds the rule of law and balances the powers of administration with protection of individual rights.
RELATED Blog
0 comments