The role of rule of law in administrative governance
The Role of Rule of Law in Administrative Governance: Overview
What is the Rule of Law?
The rule of law is a fundamental principle stating that all persons, institutions, and entities—including government agencies—are accountable to laws that are:
Publicly promulgated,
Equally enforced,
Independently adjudicated,
And consistent with international human rights principles.
Why is Rule of Law Important in Administrative Governance?
Administrative governance involves the exercise of power by government agencies in rulemaking, enforcement, adjudication, and public administration. The rule of law ensures that:
Agencies act within the limits of their legal authority (legality).
Administrative decisions are made according to fair procedures (procedural fairness/due process).
There is transparency and accountability in administrative actions.
Individuals have the ability to challenge arbitrary or unlawful administrative acts.
Decisions are based on evidence and reason, avoiding arbitrariness.
Key Elements of Rule of Law in Administrative Governance
Legality: Administrative action must conform to enabling statutes and the constitution.
Procedural Fairness: Due process rights in hearings and decision-making.
Reasoned Decisions: Agencies must provide rational explanations for decisions.
Judicial Review: Courts ensure administrative actions comply with the law.
Accountability and Transparency: Mechanisms for public participation and agency responsibility.
Significant Case Law Illustrating the Role of Rule of Law in Administrative Governance
1. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (1984)
Citation: 467 U.S. 837
Issue: The scope of judicial deference to administrative agencies’ interpretation of statutes.
Holding: The Supreme Court established the “Chevron deference” framework, where courts defer to a reasonable agency interpretation of an ambiguous statute.
Role of Rule of Law: Balances agency expertise with legal accountability, ensuring agencies act within legal bounds while respecting their specialized role.
Significance: Ensures agencies follow statutory authority, reinforcing legality and rule of law.
2. Mathews v. Eldridge (1976)
Citation: 424 U.S. 319
Issue: The requirements of due process in administrative termination of disability benefits.
Holding: The Court articulated a balancing test to determine the due process required, focusing on individual interests, risk of erroneous deprivation, and government interest.
Role of Rule of Law: Protects procedural fairness in administrative decisions affecting individual rights.
Significance: Defines procedural safeguards necessary under the rule of law.
3. Goldberg v. Kelly (1970)
Citation: 397 U.S. 254
Issue: Whether welfare benefits can be terminated without a prior hearing.
Holding: The Court ruled that due process requires an evidentiary hearing before terminating benefits.
Role of Rule of Law: Ensures fair procedures and protection of rights against arbitrary administrative action.
Significance: Emphasizes the rule of law’s role in protecting vulnerable individuals in administrative governance.
4. Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. (1983)
Citation: 463 U.S. 29
Issue: Whether an agency’s rulemaking rescinding a previous regulation was arbitrary and capricious.
Holding: The Court held that the agency must provide a reasoned explanation for rule changes.
Role of Rule of Law: Requires reasoned decision-making and guards against arbitrariness.
Significance: Affirms the rule of law principle that administrative decisions must be rational and transparent.
5. INS v. Chadha (1983)
Citation: 462 U.S. 919
Issue: The constitutionality of the legislative veto over administrative decisions.
Holding: The Court struck down the legislative veto as violating the separation of powers.
Role of Rule of Law: Protects legal limits on government power and procedural regularity.
Significance: Reinforces constitutional checks and balances in administrative governance.
6. United States v. Nixon (1974)
Citation: 418 U.S. 683
Issue: Executive privilege and limits on presidential power.
Holding: The Court limited the scope of executive privilege, emphasizing rule of law over absolute executive authority.
Role of Rule of Law: Demonstrates that no one is above the law, including administrative and executive officials.
Significance: A cornerstone for rule of law in administrative governance, emphasizing accountability.
7. Londoner v. City and County of Denver (1908)
Citation: 210 U.S. 373
Issue: Requirement of a hearing before the government can levy special assessments.
Holding: The Court held that due process requires notice and opportunity to be heard when rights are affected.
Role of Rule of Law: Grounds procedural fairness in administrative taxation or regulatory actions.
Significance: Establishes procedural due process as fundamental in administrative decisions.
Summary
The rule of law in administrative governance:
Ensures that administrative agencies act within legal authority (legality).
Requires fair and transparent procedures before agency decisions affect rights.
Demands reasoned and evidence-based decisions, avoiding arbitrariness.
Guarantees judicial oversight to maintain accountability.
Reinforces constitutional principles such as separation of powers and individual rights.
Through these principles, the rule of law prevents unchecked administrative power and protects democratic governance and individual liberties.
RELATED Blog
0 comments