Municipal councils and delegated powers
Municipal Councils and Delegated Powers: Overview
Municipal councils in Afghanistan operate as local self-government bodies responsible for managing city affairs, including urban planning, public services, local taxation, and regulatory enforcement. Their powers are often delegated by central government statutes, primarily through:
The Law on Municipalities (2000) and related regulations.
Provisions in the Afghan Constitution supporting local governance (Articles 137-139).
Delegations from the Ministry of Urban Development and Land (MUDL).
Delegated powers refer to the authority given to municipal councils to make decisions, enforce regulations, and manage local resources within the framework established by national laws.
Key issues arise in how these delegated powers are exercised, their limits, accountability, and conflicts between municipal and central authority.
🧑⚖️ Case Studies on Municipal Councils and Delegated Powers
1. Case of Urban Land Use Regulation by Kabul Municipality
Background:
Kabul Municipality passed a regulation restricting land use in a newly developed area, limiting construction height and business activities.
Issue:
Whether the municipal council had the delegated authority under the Law on Municipalities to enact such regulations, and if such regulations were consistent with national urban planning laws.
Judgment:
The Administrative Court upheld the municipal regulation, stating that the council’s delegated powers include land use planning within their jurisdiction. However, the court emphasized these powers must not conflict with national policies and require coordination with the Ministry of Urban Development.
Significance:
Affirmed the municipal council’s autonomy within delegated limits while ensuring alignment with central authority.
2. Case of Taxation Powers Exercised by Herat Municipal Council
Background:
The Herat municipal council imposed a local tax on commercial licenses to increase municipal revenues.
Issue:
Whether the municipal council had the delegated authority to impose taxes or fees, and whether due process was followed.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court ruled that municipal councils may impose fees and taxes only as explicitly authorized by law. Since no specific legislation empowered Herat to levy this tax, the court declared it unlawful and void.
Significance:
Clarified that delegation of taxation powers requires clear legal authorization.
3. Case of Dismissal of Municipal Employees by Local Council
Background:
A municipal council dismissed several employees for alleged misconduct without following formal administrative procedures.
Issue:
Whether the council acted within its delegated administrative powers and complied with due process requirements under the Civil Service Law.
Judgment:
The court found the dismissals invalid due to lack of proper investigation and hearing, ordering reinstatement. It held that delegated administrative powers must be exercised in conformity with procedural fairness.
Significance:
Highlighted the limits of delegated powers and protection of employee rights.
4. Case of Conflict Between Provincial Governor and Municipal Council
Background:
The provincial governor issued a directive overruling a decision of the municipal council concerning market regulations.
Issue:
Whether the governor had supervisory authority to override municipal council decisions.
Judgment:
The Supreme Administrative Court held that while municipal councils exercise delegated powers, governors retain supervisory authority under Article 138 of the Constitution to ensure compliance with law and public interest. The governor’s directive was upheld but required justification and proportionality.
Significance:
Outlined the balance between delegated powers and supervisory oversight.
5. Case of Public Procurement by Municipal Council
Background:
The municipal council awarded contracts for street maintenance without competitive bidding, raising corruption concerns.
Issue:
Whether the municipal council violated procurement laws despite having delegated contract-awarding powers.
Judgment:
The Anti-Corruption Justice Center intervened, ruling that delegated powers do not exempt municipal councils from complying with national procurement regulations. The contracts were annulled and officials sanctioned.
Significance:
Reinforced the accountability of municipal bodies under delegated powers.
6. Case of Public Protest Against Municipal Service Fees
Background:
Citizens protested new fees imposed by a municipal council for garbage collection services.
Issue:
Whether the municipal council had properly exercised its delegated authority and engaged in public consultation.
Judgment:
The court mandated suspension of the fees until the council conducted required consultations and followed legal procedures for fee imposition.
Significance:
Emphasized transparency and participatory governance in exercising delegated powers.
7. Case of Zoning Violations and Illegal Construction
Background:
Municipal council failed to enforce zoning laws, allowing illegal constructions favored by council members.
Issue:
Misuse or failure to exercise delegated enforcement powers.
Judgment:
The court ordered the municipal council to enforce zoning laws strictly and held liable any officials who breached their duties. It recommended oversight mechanisms.
Significance:
Stressed responsibility and rule of law in delegation.
Summary Table
| Case Focus | Delegated Power | Legal Issue | Outcome/Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Urban Land Use Regulation | Land use planning | Scope and limits of delegation | Upheld but subject to central coordination |
| Local Taxation | Levying fees/taxes | Legal authorization required | Tax declared unlawful |
| Employee Dismissal | Administrative authority | Due process compliance | Dismissals invalidated |
| Conflict with Governor | Supervisory powers | Balance of authority | Governor’s override upheld with limits |
| Public Procurement | Contract awarding | Compliance with procurement laws | Contracts annulled, sanctions |
| Service Fees & Protest | Fee imposition | Public consultation required | Fees suspended pending process |
| Zoning Enforcement | Regulatory enforcement | Accountability for failures | Enforcement mandated, officials liable |
Conclusion
Municipal councils in Afghanistan exercise important delegated powers crucial for local governance. Afghan case law demonstrates a delicate balance: councils must operate within legal frameworks, respecting limits of delegation, procedural fairness, transparency, and accountability. Central government retains supervisory powers to ensure legality and public interest, reinforcing a system of checks and balances in local administration.
RELATED Blog
0 comments