Globalisation and administrative law in Melbourne
Globalisation and Administrative Law in Melbourne
What is Globalisation’s Impact on Administrative Law?
Globalisation involves increasing cross-border interaction in trade, communication, law, and governance. It affects administrative law by:
Broadening the scope of administrative decisions involving international treaties, trade, migration, and environmental obligations.
Introducing international standards and human rights norms into domestic administrative processes.
Increasing complexity in administrative decision-making due to transnational issues.
Enhancing judicial cooperation and influence of international jurisprudence.
In Melbourne (and Victoria more broadly), administrative law has adapted to incorporate these changes, especially through tribunals and courts handling cases with global or international dimensions.
Key Themes of Globalisation in Melbourne’s Administrative Law
International human rights impact on administrative decisions.
Trade and economic regulations influenced by global agreements.
Immigration and refugee administrative decisions affected by international law.
Environmental governance with global commitments like climate accords.
Recognition of foreign judgments and cross-border enforcement.
Important Victorian Case Laws Illustrating Globalisation’s Impact on Administrative Law
1. Plaintiff M61/2010E v Commonwealth (2010) HCA
Context:
Challenge to government’s offshore processing of asylum seekers under immigration law.
Significance:
The High Court of Australia examined the extent of executive power in immigration detention, emphasizing international obligations under refugee law.
Although a federal case, it profoundly influences Victoria’s administrative law concerning global refugee standards.
Lesson: Administrative decisions affecting migrants must consider international human rights norms, showing globalisation’s impact on domestic administrative law.
2. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Al Masri (2003) FCA
Context:
Review of visa cancellation involving terrorism suspicions.
Significance:
The Federal Court applied international law principles alongside domestic administrative law.
The case reflected balancing national security with individual rights under international human rights instruments.
Demonstrates cross-border concerns influencing administrative decisions in Melbourne and Victoria.
Lesson: Global security issues affect administrative decision-making and judicial review.
3. Victorian Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority v Minister for Health (2017) VCAT
Context:
Dispute involving ethical standards influenced by international human rights and bioethics norms.
Significance:
VCAT considered international guidelines on reproductive rights and health in its administrative review.
Demonstrated how global ethical and human rights standards inform local administrative governance.
Lesson: Global norms are increasingly referenced in local administrative tribunals in Victoria.
4. Environment East Gippsland Inc v VicForests (2012) VCAT
Context:
Environmental protection vs commercial forestry decision.
Significance:
Tribunal referenced international environmental agreements (like the Convention on Biological Diversity) in assessing the reasonableness of administrative actions.
Showed how global environmental commitments shape administrative review in Victoria.
Lesson: Global environmental concerns influence local administrative decisions and tribunals.
5. R v Tang (2008) HCA
Context:
Human trafficking prosecution with administrative law implications in victim support.
Significance:
The High Court’s interpretation of Australian laws aligned with international protocols against trafficking.
Highlighted the need for administrative frameworks to align with global human rights standards.
Lesson: Globalisation requires administrative law to adapt to international criminal justice and victim protection norms.
Summary
Globalisation broadens the scope and complexity of administrative law in Melbourne, impacting areas like immigration, human rights, environment, and trade.
Victorian courts and tribunals increasingly consider international law, treaties, and global standards in reviewing administrative decisions.
Cases like Plaintiff M61, Environment East Gippsland, and Minister Al Masri illustrate this integration.
The trend reflects harmonisation of domestic administrative practices with global legal frameworks, ensuring transparency, fairness, and compliance with international obligations.
RELATED Blog
0 comments