Case study method in administrative law research
Case Study Method in Administrative Law Research
What is the Case Study Method?
The case study method involves a detailed, in-depth examination of specific instances (cases) within administrative law to:
Understand how principles are applied in real situations
Analyze judicial reasoning and interpretation
Identify patterns, principles, and exceptions
Evaluate the effectiveness of administrative procedures
Develop or critique legal doctrines based on empirical evidence
Why Use Case Study Method in Administrative Law?
Complexity of Administrative Actions: Administrative law deals with complex government actions affecting rights and duties. Case studies help unpack these complexities.
Judicial Interpretation: Courts interpret vague statutory provisions or administrative policies through judgments. Case studies analyze such decisions to understand legal principles.
Policy Impact: They assess how administrative decisions affect society, ensuring accountability and fairness.
Development of Doctrine: Case studies help in tracing the evolution of administrative law through landmark decisions.
Important Case Laws Analyzed Through Case Study Method
1. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)
Context: Landmark constitutional case involving the power of Parliament to amend the Constitution.
Administrative Law Aspect: Impact on the scope of administrative powers and judicial review.
Analysis: Case studies here explore the Basic Structure Doctrine, limiting administrative and legislative overreach.
Significance: Demonstrates how case study analysis reveals constitutional limits on administrative power.
2. A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India (1969)
Context: Challenged the administrative authority’s bias in appointment procedures.
Administrative Law Aspect: Natural justice and bias in administrative decisions.
Analysis: Case studies show how courts enforce procedural fairness in administrative actions.
Significance: Highlights judiciary’s role in curbing arbitrariness in administration.
3. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)
Context: Challenge to passport impoundment without proper procedure.
Administrative Law Aspect: Expansion of procedural due process.
Analysis: Case studies examine judicial activism in protecting personal liberty against administrative arbitrariness.
Significance: Shows evolving standards of fairness through judicial interpretation.
4. S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1981)
Context: Right to information and transparency in administration.
Administrative Law Aspect: Accountability and openness in administrative actions.
Analysis: Case studies reveal the development of access to information as a fundamental right.
Significance: Emphasizes transparency as a check on administrative power.
5. Union of India v. Tulsiram Patel (1985)
Context: Disciplinary proceedings and procedural safeguards.
Administrative Law Aspect: Natural justice in administrative disciplinary actions.
Analysis: Case studies explore procedural rights and judicial review in administrative discipline.
Significance: Reinforces fair inquiry as integral to administrative justice.
How the Case Study Method Enhances Administrative Law Research:
| Aspect | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Empirical Analysis | Real cases provide empirical data on administrative practice and judicial responses. |
| Judicial Reasoning | Detailed examination of judgments clarifies legal reasoning and principles. |
| Doctrinal Development | Tracking case evolution aids in understanding growth of legal doctrines. |
| Policy Implications | Analyzing cases reveals impact of administrative policies on rights and governance. |
| Comparative Insights | Case studies allow comparison between different administrative jurisdictions and approaches. |
Summary
The case study method is vital in administrative law research because it:
Brings theoretical principles into practical context
Helps researchers understand judicial attitudes towards administrative discretion and fairness
Highlights strengths and gaps in administrative justice
Guides policy reforms based on judicial findings
RELATED Blog
0 comments