Case studies on denial of basic rights
Denial of Basic Rights: Overview
Basic rights such as the right to life, liberty, education, freedom of expression, equality, and due process are enshrined in the Afghan Constitution (2004) and reinforced by international treaties Afghanistan has ratified, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC).
Despite these guarantees, denial of basic rights has been a persistent issue, especially amid conflict, political instability, and social discrimination. Afghan courts and human rights bodies have periodically addressed these issues through case rulings and administrative interventions.
🧑⚖️ Case Studies on Denial of Basic Rights
1. Case of Denial of Right to Education for Girls
Background:
In a southern province, local authorities closed girls’ schools citing “security concerns” and cultural objections.
Issue:
Violation of the right to education guaranteed under Article 44 of the Afghan Constitution, and international law under CEDAW and CRC.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court of Afghanistan ruled that the closures were unconstitutional and ordered reopening of schools with proper security measures. It emphasized that denying education based on gender or security fears violates both domestic law and international commitments.
Significance:
Set a precedent for protecting girls’ education as a fundamental right, even in conflict zones.
2. Case of Arbitrary Arrest and Detention Without Trial
Background:
A man was detained by security forces on suspicion of Taliban affiliation but was held for months without charges or access to a lawyer.
Issue:
Violation of the right to liberty and due process under Article 31 of the Constitution and Article 9 of ICCPR.
Judgment:
The High Court ordered immediate release and compensation, citing illegal detention. It stressed that even under security threats, administrative powers cannot override due process.
Significance:
Reinforced constitutional safeguards against arbitrary detention.
3. Case of Discrimination Against Ethnic Minorities in Employment
Background:
A Hazara community filed complaints that they were systematically denied government jobs in a provincial office dominated by another ethnic group.
Issue:
Violation of the right to equality under Article 22 of the Constitution and ICCPR Article 26.
Judgment:
The Civil Service Commission found discriminatory hiring practices and mandated reforms, including quotas to ensure ethnic representation.
Significance:
Demonstrated efforts to address ethnic discrimination in public employment.
4. Case of Restrictions on Freedom of Assembly
Background:
Civil society activists were denied permits to hold peaceful protests in Kabul, with administrative authorities citing vague security threats.
Issue:
Infringement on freedom of assembly under Article 34 of the Constitution and ICCPR Article 21.
Judgment:
The administrative court ruled the denial illegal and ordered the government to facilitate peaceful protests, emphasizing that security concerns must be specific and proportionate.
Significance:
Affirmed the constitutional right to peaceful assembly despite security challenges.
5. Case of Denial of Medical Care to Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs)
Background:
IDPs fleeing conflict zones reported being denied access to government-run clinics in a northern province.
Issue:
Violation of the right to health under Article 52 of the Constitution and International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR).
Judgment:
The Human Rights Commission intervened, ordering health authorities to provide services without discrimination and improve access for IDPs.
Significance:
Recognized healthcare as a basic right irrespective of status or displacement.
6. Case of Press Censorship and Harassment
Background:
A local newspaper critical of government policies was shut down by administrative decree, and journalists were harassed.
Issue:
Violation of freedom of expression under Article 34 of the Constitution and ICCPR Article 19.
Judgment:
The Supreme Court invalidated the administrative order, stating that censorship must meet strict necessity and legality criteria.
Significance:
Reinforced press freedom protections in Afghanistan.
7. Case of Denial of Property Rights
Background:
In the context of land disputes, a rural family was forcibly evicted by local officials without due legal process.
Issue:
Violation of property rights under Article 40 of the Constitution.
Judgment:
The court ordered restitution of property and damages, affirming the requirement for due process in property disputes.
Significance:
Protected citizens’ property rights from arbitrary administrative actions.
Summary Table
| Case Topic | Basic Right Denied | Legal Basis | Outcome/Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Girls’ Education Closure | Right to Education | Constitution Art. 44, CEDAW, CRC | Schools ordered reopened |
| Arbitrary Detention | Right to Liberty & Due Process | Constitution Art. 31, ICCPR Art. 9 | Release and compensation |
| Ethnic Employment Discrimination | Equality & Non-discrimination | Constitution Art. 22, ICCPR Art. 26 | Reform and quotas mandated |
| Freedom of Assembly Denial | Freedom of Assembly | Constitution Art. 34, ICCPR Art. 21 | Protest permits restored |
| Healthcare Denial to IDPs | Right to Health | Constitution Art. 52, ICESCR | Services ordered extended |
| Press Censorship | Freedom of Expression | Constitution Art. 34, ICCPR Art. 19 | Censorship overturned |
| Forced Property Eviction | Property Rights | Constitution Art. 40 | Property restitution |
Conclusion
Denial of basic rights remains a critical challenge in Afghanistan’s fragile legal and political environment. However, Afghan courts and administrative bodies have increasingly used constitutional provisions and international human rights law to uphold these rights, even amid conflict and instability. These case studies demonstrate the growing role of legal mechanisms in defending fundamental freedoms and addressing abuses.
RELATED Blog
0 comments