Equality before Finnish administrative authorities
Equality Before Finnish Administrative Authorities
In Finland, the principle of equality before administrative authorities is a fundamental legal norm enshrined in the Finnish Constitution (Section 6) and various administrative laws. This principle means that all individuals, regardless of their background, status, or characteristics, should be treated equally when they interact with public administration. It prohibits arbitrary discrimination and requires fair and impartial treatment in administrative decisions and processes.
Equality is not only about identical treatment but about equal respect for rights and legitimate interests, meaning that similar cases should be treated alike unless there is an objective and reasonable justification for differentiation.
Core Elements of Equality in Finnish Administrative Law
Non-discrimination — No discrimination based on ethnicity, gender, age, religion, or other irrelevant grounds.
Impartiality — Authorities must be unbiased and objective.
Consistency — Similar cases should receive similar treatment.
Proportionality — Any differentiation must be justifiable, necessary, and proportionate.
Case Law Illustrations
1. Supreme Administrative Court (KHO) 2007:21
Issue: Unequal treatment of applicants in a permit process.
Facts: Several applicants applied for environmental permits. One applicant was granted the permit, while others were rejected without clear justification.
Ruling: The Court emphasized the principle of equality and stated that administrative authorities must provide transparent and reasoned grounds for any differentiation. Since the permits involved similar circumstances, denying permits to some applicants without adequate justification was deemed a violation of equality.
Significance: Administrative decisions must be justified explicitly when treating similar applicants differently.
2. Supreme Administrative Court (KHO) 2013:58
Issue: Differential treatment of social welfare benefits based on residency duration.
Facts: An applicant was denied social welfare benefits because they had not lived in the municipality long enough, while others with longer residency received benefits.
Ruling: The Court held that while administrative authorities can set criteria for benefits, these criteria must not be arbitrary or discriminatory. The residency requirement was accepted as justified because it aimed to allocate limited resources fairly.
Significance: Differentiation can be lawful if objectively justified and proportional.
3. Administrative Court of Helsinki, 2015
Issue: Gender-based discrimination in public employment.
Facts: A woman was rejected from a public job position, allegedly due to a preference for male candidates.
Ruling: The Court found the decision violated equality principles under Finnish law and international human rights standards. The administration must ensure no gender-based bias in recruitment.
Significance: Equality applies in all administrative actions, including hiring.
4. Supreme Administrative Court (KHO) 2018:75
Issue: Unequal enforcement of building regulations.
Facts: Two property owners violated the same building code, but only one received a penalty.
Ruling: The Court ruled this as unequal treatment without proper justification. Administrative authorities must apply regulations uniformly unless different treatment is objectively justified.
Significance: Enforcement actions must be consistent and based on clear criteria.
5. Supreme Administrative Court (KHO) 2020:45
Issue: Language rights and access to services.
Facts: A Finnish-speaking resident was denied services in their native language, while Swedish-speaking residents received bilingual services.
Ruling: The Court ruled that while language rights are protected, differences in treatment must be justified by law. The administration must ensure equal access to essential services for all linguistic groups.
Significance: Equality includes respecting minority rights and ensuring nondiscriminatory access to public services.
Summary
The principle of equality before Finnish administrative authorities demands that:
Administrative authorities treat similar cases alike.
Any differentiation must be reasonable, justified, and proportional.
Administrative actions are free from discrimination based on irrelevant grounds.
Equal access to public services and fair procedures are guaranteed.
The Finnish Supreme Administrative Court has consistently reinforced these principles through its rulings, emphasizing transparency, reasoned decision-making, and protection against arbitrary treatment.
RELATED Blog
0 comments