Renewable energy licensing
š Introduction:
Renewable energy licensing is the legal process through which entities (individuals, companies, or government bodies) obtain permission to construct, operate, and maintain facilities that generate electricity from renewable sources like solar, wind, hydro, biomass, and geothermal. These licenses ensure the projects meet safety, environmental, and technical standards, and that they comply with national and local energy policies.
The licensing process is crucial for:
Grid integration
Power purchase agreements (PPAs)
Land use permissions
Environmental clearances
Ensuring public safety and infrastructure standards
Different countries have different regulatory bodies (e.g., FERC in the U.S., CERC/SERC in India, Ofgem in the UK), but the core principles remain largely similar.
š§¾ Types of Licenses in Renewable Energy:
Generation License ā To generate power from renewable sources.
Transmission License ā For transmitting electricity to the grid.
Distribution License ā For distributing power to end-users.
Trading License ā For buying and selling electricity.
Open Access License ā To sell directly to consumers bypassing distribution licensees.
āļø Key Case Laws in Renewable Energy Licensing
Below are 5 detailed case law explanations from different jurisdictions that have shaped renewable energy licensing practices:
1. Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd. v. Solar Semiconductor Power Company (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Citation: Civil Appeal No. 6399 of 2016, Supreme Court of India
Facts:
Gujarat Urja (GUVNL), a state utility, signed a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with Solar Semiconductor under the state solar policy.
The generator failed to commission the project within the stipulated time.
GUVNL moved to terminate the PPA and deny tariff benefits.
Issues:
Whether the generator was entitled to tariff benefits after failing to meet the commissioning deadline.
Whether the SERC (State Electricity Regulatory Commission) had jurisdiction to modify the PPA.
Held:
The Supreme Court held that licensing terms, including tariff orders and timelines, are binding.
Failure to meet licensing obligations (like timely commissioning) can result in loss of benefits and cancellation of license/PPA.
The SERC cannot re-write a contract under the guise of regulatory powers.
Significance:
Reinforced the importance of complying with licensing timelines and obligations.
Clarified the limits of regulatory intervention.
2. In Re: Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) Mechanism
Citation: Petition No. 142/MP/2012, Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (India)
Facts:
Renewable energy generators with open access were entitled to Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs).
Some states refused to grant RECs to generators citing lack of local consumption or other procedural issues.
Issues:
Whether RE generators can claim RECs even if the power is not used within the state.
Whether state commissions can override CERC regulations.
Held:
CERC ruled that renewable generators complying with the central REC regulations are entitled to RECs.
State commissions cannot add extra conditions to central regulations unless permitted.
Significance:
Emphasized the primacy of central regulation in licensing and compliance.
Strengthened the national REC mechanism, crucial for licensing RE generation.
3. Friends of the Earth Ltd. v. Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Citation: [2022] EWHC 1841 (Admin), UK
Facts:
Environmental groups challenged the UK governmentās licensing and support of fossil fuel projects, arguing failure to adequately consider renewable alternatives and climate change obligations.
Issues:
Whether the licensing of non-renewable projects breached the UK's legal duty to transition to renewables.
Whether climate commitments must be considered in licensing decisions.
Held:
The court agreed partially, emphasizing that licensing decisions must factor in net-zero obligations and renewable energy commitments under domestic and international law.
Significance:
Highlighted the need to align licensing with climate change commitments.
Encouraged governments to prefer renewable energy licensing over fossil fuels.
4. EDF Renewable Energy, Inc. v. FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission)
Citation: 832 F.3d 41 (D.C. Cir. 2016), U.S. Court of Appeals
Facts:
EDF challenged FERCās denial of their application to interconnect a renewable project to the transmission grid.
FERC argued the project did not meet required reliability standards.
Issues:
Whether FERC fairly applied grid access licensing standards to renewable generators.
Whether denial violated the open access principles under the Federal Power Act.
Held:
The Court sided with FERC, stating that while FERC must not discriminate against renewables, reliability and safety standards are non-negotiable in licensing.
Significance:
Reaffirmed that licensing must balance promotion of renewables with grid stability and reliability.
Emphasized the technical standards in RE licensing.
5. National Solar Energy Federation of India v. Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulatory Commission
Citation: Appeal No. 92 of 2017, Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL), India
Facts:
The TNERC imposed additional charges on solar generators using open access to sell power directly to consumers.
This went against the open access rights provided under the Electricity Act and the National Tariff Policy.
Issues:
Whether state commissions can impose additional licensing conditions on RE projects.
Whether such charges discourage RE development.
Held:
APTEL held that imposing such charges on solar projects was contrary to the intent of the Electricity Act.
States cannot discourage RE through financial or procedural hurdles.
Significance:
Protected open access rights of renewable generators.
Prevented discriminatory licensing practices by state commissions.
ā Summary of Key Legal Principles from Case Law:
| Principle | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Adherence to License Conditions | Failure to meet terms like commissioning timelines can void benefits (GUVNL case). |
| Non-Discrimination | Regulators cannot treat RE projects unfairly (EDF v. FERC, Solar Open Access case). |
| Jurisdictional Boundaries | State regulators cannot override central REC/licensing regulations (CERC REC Case). |
| Environmental Compliance | Licensing must reflect climate change obligations (Friends of the Earth case). |
| Technical Standards | Grid access must meet reliability standards regardless of technology (EDF v. FERC). |
š Conclusion:
Renewable energy licensing is not merely administrativeāit is a complex legal process governed by statutory laws, technical standards, and policy commitments. The above cases demonstrate how courts and commissions across jurisdictions interpret and enforce these licensing rules, ensuring that renewable energy growth is both sustainable and legally robust.
RELATED Blog
0 comments