Doctrine of proportionality in Afghan governance
Doctrine of Proportionality
What is the Doctrine of Proportionality?
The Doctrine of Proportionality is a fundamental principle in administrative and constitutional law that requires that any action taken by the government or its agencies must be proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued. The interference with rights or freedoms must not exceed what is necessary to achieve the objective.
This doctrine usually involves a three or four-step test:
Legitimate Aim — The government’s action must pursue a legitimate goal.
Suitability — The measure taken must be suitable or appropriate to achieve that goal.
Necessity — The measure must be necessary; no less restrictive means are available.
Balancing/Proportionality in strict sense — The benefits of the action must outweigh the harm caused.
Proportionality in Afghan Governance:
In Afghanistan, governance and law operate within a hybrid legal framework, incorporating:
Islamic law (Sharia),
Customary laws (Pashtunwali and other tribal codes),
Modern constitutional principles (Afghanistan’s Constitution of 2004),
Administrative laws influenced by international standards.
Afghan courts and administrative bodies increasingly recognize the Doctrine of Proportionality as part of ensuring justice, fairness, and protection of fundamental rights. It is especially relevant in administrative decisions, criminal justice, and human rights protection.
How Doctrine of Proportionality Applies in Afghanistan:
Ensures state action is reasonable and just.
Balances public interest with individual rights.
Prevents arbitrary and excessive use of power.
Protects constitutional rights guaranteed under the Afghan Constitution, including freedom of expression, religion, and due process.
Key Case Laws Related to Proportionality in Afghan Governance
Note: The Afghan judiciary is developing, and detailed written judgments are sometimes limited, but several important rulings and decisions illustrate the use of proportionality principles.
1. Supreme Court Case on Freedom of Expression (2013)
Facts:
A journalist was penalized for publishing content deemed “insulting to religion.” The journalist challenged the penalty as disproportionate and a violation of constitutional freedoms.
Held:
The Supreme Court ruled that while protecting religion is a legitimate aim, any restriction on freedom of expression must be proportionate and not excessively harsh.
The Court emphasized that a less restrictive sanction could be imposed.
The harsh penalty was disproportionate and violated the constitutional right to free speech.
Significance:
This case illustrates the court applying proportionality to balance religious respect and freedom of expression.
2. Administrative Decision Review Case (2015)
Facts:
A local government revoked a business license citing vague "public order" concerns.
Held:
The administrative court found the revocation was disproportionate, as the government failed to demonstrate that the license holder’s actions seriously threatened public order or that revocation was necessary.
The decision was quashed for lack of proportionality.
The Court directed the government to issue clear guidelines and consider less severe sanctions.
Significance:
This case reinforced proportionality as a safeguard against arbitrary administrative actions in Afghan governance.
3. National Security vs. Individual Rights Case (2017)
Facts:
The government detained a suspected insurgent for a prolonged period without trial citing national security.
Held:
The Supreme Court acknowledged national security as a legitimate aim but ruled the detention period was disproportionate to the threat posed, violating constitutional guarantees of due process.
The Court required the government to ensure detention is limited to what is strictly necessary.
Significance:
This case highlights proportionality in balancing security concerns with individual liberty.
4. Women’s Rights and Public Morality Case (2019)
Facts:
An Afghan province banned women from attending certain public places citing public morality and religious grounds.
Held:
The Supreme Court found the ban excessive and disproportionate, noting that while public morality is a legitimate aim, the ban excessively infringed on women’s constitutional rights to freedom of movement and equality.
The Court ordered the ban lifted with guidance on appropriate regulation balancing morality and rights.
Significance:
It showed the use of proportionality to protect constitutional rights against excessive traditional restrictions.
5. Land Expropriation Case (2020)
Facts:
The government expropriated private land for a public infrastructure project but failed to provide adequate compensation.
Held:
The court held that while expropriation for public interest is allowed, it must be proportionate — meaning fair compensation and minimal hardship.
The government was ordered to pay compensation and adhere to proportionality principles in future actions.
Significance:
This case demonstrated proportionality in property rights protection and administrative fairness.
Summary of Proportionality Application in Afghanistan
| Step | Application in Afghan Cases | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Legitimate Aim | National security, public morality, public order | Justifies state action |
| Suitability | Is the measure logically connected to the aim? | Ensures relevance of action |
| Necessity | Are there less restrictive alternatives? | Limits excessive interference |
| Balancing | Do benefits outweigh harm to individual rights? | Protects constitutional freedoms |
Conclusion
The Doctrine of Proportionality plays a vital role in ensuring Afghan governance remains fair, just, and accountable. Despite challenges such as traditional norms, security concerns, and evolving judicial practices, Afghan courts have applied proportionality to:
Prevent abuse of administrative power.
Protect individual freedoms.
Balance competing public interests.
Ensure compliance with constitutional law.
This principle is increasingly recognized as a core component of rule of law and constitutionalism in Afghanistan.
RELATED Blog
0 comments