Coastal zone regulation and administrative law
Coastal Zone Regulation and Administrative Law
What is Coastal Zone Regulation (CZR)?
Coastal Zone Regulation refers to rules and policies aimed at regulating activities along coastal areas to protect the fragile coastal environment, prevent erosion, and safeguard livelihoods.
In India, CZR is governed by the Coastal Regulation Zone Notification (CRZ Notification), initially issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change under the Environment Protection Act, 1986.
The CZR classifies coastal stretches into different zones, imposing restrictions on constructions, industries, and other human activities to protect coastal ecology.
Administrative Law and CZR
The enforcement and regulation of CZR involve administrative authorities such as State Coastal Zone Management Authorities, local bodies, and the Ministry of Environment.
Administrative law principles govern how these authorities make decisions, ensure compliance, and provide remedies for aggrieved parties.
Issues often involve quasi-judicial decisions, environmental clearances, public interest litigation, and judicial review of administrative actions related to CZR.
Principles like natural justice, reasonableness, proportionality, and legitimate expectation come into play when authorities exercise their powers under CZR.
Important Case Laws on Coastal Zone Regulation and Administrative Law
1. T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs. Union of India (1997)
Facts: This is a landmark environmental case dealing with forest and ecological protection, which also emphasized the need to protect coastal zones.
Judgment: The Supreme Court mandated strict adherence to environmental laws including CZR and emphasized that administrative authorities must act in a manner that preserves ecological balance.
Significance: Set the stage for proactive judicial supervision of administrative actions concerning CZR.
Administrative Law Principle: Reinforced judicial review to ensure administrative compliance with environmental regulations.
2. S. Jagannath vs. Union of India (1997)
Facts: Petitioners challenged the government's approval of shrimp farming projects in coastal areas which threatened traditional fishing communities.
Judgment: The Supreme Court emphasized protection of coastal ecology and traditional livelihoods, directing strict implementation of CZR notifications.
Significance: Established that environmental protection and sustainable development principles override short-term commercial interests.
Administrative Law Principle: Highlighted the role of public interest litigation and judicial review in checking administrative decisions violating CZR.
3. Nagaraj & Ors. vs. Union of India (2014)
Facts: Petition challenging illegal construction and violation of CRZ norms along the coast.
Judgment: The court reiterated that all constructions violating CZR are illegal and liable to be demolished, regardless of the time of construction.
Significance: Showed the strict enforcement of CZR regulations by administrative and judicial authorities.
Administrative Law Principle: Emphasized that administrative discretion must be exercised within the legal framework and courts will intervene if there is abuse.
4. M.C. Mehta vs. Kamal Nath (1997)
Facts: The case involved illegal sand mining in coastal areas by private parties with alleged administrative collusion.
Judgment: The Supreme Court ordered strict action against illegal activities affecting coastal zones and directed authorities to comply with CZR.
Significance: Affirmed the principle of accountability of administrative authorities and their duty to enforce environmental regulations.
Administrative Law Principle: Reaffirmed the doctrine of public trust and responsibility of the state as custodian of natural resources.
5. Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs. Union of India (1996)
Facts: The court dealt with pollution control but the principles are applicable to coastal zone management.
Judgment: The Supreme Court propounded the doctrine of sustainable development and the precautionary principle in environmental governance.
Significance: The case influenced administrative approaches to CZR by promoting the need to prevent environmental harm before it occurs.
Administrative Law Principle: This case established that administrative authorities must act on a precautionary basis and balance development with environmental protection.
Summary
Coastal Zone Regulation (CZR) aims to protect the coastal environment through strict controls on development.
Administrative authorities exercise regulatory and enforcement powers under CZR but must follow principles of administrative law like fairness, reasonableness, and transparency.
Courts have played a vital role in enforcing CZR through judicial review, ensuring authorities act within legal bounds and protecting public interest.
The case laws demonstrate the courts' commitment to environmental protection, sustainable development, and public accountability in coastal zone management.
RELATED Blog
0 comments