Workplace safety in pandemics
Workplace safety during pandemics—particularly COVID-19—is governed by overlapping legal frameworks, including:
OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Act)
State workplace safety laws
Public health orders and emergency declarations
ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act)
Constitutional protections (e.g., free exercise, equal protection)
During a pandemic, employers may be required to:
Provide personal protective equipment (PPE)
Enforce social distancing
Allow remote work or make accommodations
Report infections or exposures
Avoid retaliation against employees reporting safety concerns
⚖️ Key Case Law – Detailed Analysis (More Than 5 Cases)
1. National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor (OSHA), 595 U.S. ___ (2022)
U.S. Supreme Court
🔍 Facts:
OSHA issued an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) requiring large employers (100+ workers) to ensure workers were vaccinated or tested weekly.
🧑⚖️ Issue:
Did OSHA exceed its authority under the OSH Act?
⚖️ Holding:
The Supreme Court struck down the ETS, stating OSHA lacks authority to regulate public health broadly.
OSHA can regulate workplace-specific hazards, not general dangers like COVID-19 that exist outside the workplace too.
🔑 Takeaway:
Pandemic response must fit within the agency’s statutory limits.
Courts will apply the major questions doctrine for significant regulatory actions.
2. In re: MCP No. 165, OSHA COVID Rule, 20 F.4th 264 (6th Cir. 2021)
6th Circuit Court of Appeals
🔍 Facts:
A consolidated challenge to OSHA’s vaccine/testing rule for large employers.
🧑⚖️ Issue:
Was OSHA’s Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) valid?
⚖️ Holding:
The 6th Circuit upheld the rule, finding that OSHA acted within its authority to address a “grave danger.”
🔑 Takeaway:
This contrasted with the Supreme Court’s later ruling, showing judicial disagreement.
Temporarily highlighted OSHA’s role in workplace pandemic protections.
3. Doe v. New York City Department of Education, 21-cv-8434 (S.D.N.Y. 2021)
Federal District Court (Southern District of NY)
🔍 Facts:
NYC mandated COVID-19 vaccination for public school employees.
Unvaccinated employees were placed on leave or terminated.
🧑⚖️ Issue:
Did the mandate violate constitutional rights (e.g., due process, equal protection, religion)?
⚖️ Holding:
The court upheld the mandate, citing the city’s compelling interest in protecting public health.
Religious exemption claims were also rejected due to failure to show sincere beliefs or feasible accommodations.
🔑 Takeaway:
Courts generally upheld employer mandates, especially in public employment, during the pandemic.
4. League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) v. Abbott, 2020 WL 7339317 (W.D. Tex. 2020)
Federal District Court (Texas)
🔍 Facts:
LULAC sued Texas officials for failing to implement safety protocols for poll workers during the pandemic.
🧑⚖️ Issue:
Did the failure to provide protections (e.g., PPE, distancing) violate federal law?
⚖️ Holding:
The court found the plaintiffs raised serious health and safety concerns, but stopped short of mandating specific measures.
Recognized limits on federal court intervention in state administrative decisions.
🔑 Takeaway:
Demonstrated tension between workplace safety and political discretion in public health contexts.
5. Palmer v. Amazon.com, Inc., 498 F. Supp. 3d 359 (E.D.N.Y. 2020)
Federal District Court (New York)
🔍 Facts:
Amazon warehouse workers alleged the company failed to follow COVID-19 safety guidelines (cleaning, distancing).
🧑⚖️ Issue:
Did Amazon violate the duty to provide a safe workplace under state and federal law?
⚖️ Holding:
The court dismissed the claims, holding that OSHA—not the court—has primary jurisdiction over such complaints.
Invoked the “primary jurisdiction doctrine.”
🔑 Takeaway:
Courts deferred to OSHA even when employers were allegedly negligent during a pandemic.
6. Valentine v. Collier, 956 F.3d 797 (5th Cir. 2020)
5th Circuit Court of Appeals
🔍 Facts:
Inmates at a Texas prison sued over inadequate COVID protections, including lack of masks and soap.
🧑⚖️ Issue:
Did prison officials’ inaction violate the Eighth Amendment (cruel and unusual punishment)?
⚖️ Holding:
The court found no deliberate indifference, despite subpar conditions.
🔑 Takeaway:
High bar for proving constitutional violations, even when workplace (or prison) safety is poor during a pandemic.
7. Smith v. Biden, 2022 WL 757237 (D. Md. 2022)
Federal District Court (Maryland)
🔍 Facts:
Federal contractor employees challenged the Biden administration’s vaccine mandate as unconstitutional and outside executive power.
🧑⚖️ Issue:
Did the federal government have authority to mandate vaccines for federal contractors?
⚖️ Holding:
Court found that the mandate exceeded the President’s authority under the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act.
🔑 Takeaway:
Even in emergencies, executive actions must be tied to clear statutory authority.
🔍 Summary Table
| Case | Court | Issue | Holding | Key Takeaway |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NFIB v. OSHA (2022) | SCOTUS | OSHA vaccine/testing rule | Invalidated ETS | Workplace rule ≠ general health policy |
| MCP No. 165 (2021) | 6th Cir. | OSHA authority | Upheld ETS (later reversed) | Conflicting lower court interpretations |
| Doe v. NYC DOE (2021) | S.D.N.Y. | Vaccine mandate for teachers | Upheld | Courts supported employer mandates |
| LULAC v. Abbott (2020) | W.D. Tex. | Worker protections for poll workers | Limited relief | Pandemic policy ≠ justiciable in all cases |
| Palmer v. Amazon (2020) | E.D.N.Y. | Unsafe warehouse conditions | Dismissed | OSHA has primary authority |
| Valentine v. Collier (2020) | 5th Cir. | Inmate safety in prisons | No constitutional violation | High threshold for Eighth Amendment claims |
| Smith v. Biden (2022) | D. Md. | Vaccine mandate for contractors | Invalidated | Statutory limits on executive orders enforced |
✅ Key Legal Principles from These Cases:
Statutory Boundaries Matter – Agencies like OSHA cannot exceed the authority granted to them by Congress, even in emergencies.
Primary Jurisdiction Doctrine – Courts often defer workplace safety claims to administrative agencies (like OSHA), especially during pandemics.
Emergency Does Not Erase Rights – Public health concerns don’t automatically override constitutional limits on government power.
Mandates Can Be Upheld – When properly grounded in statute or employment policy, vaccine/testing mandates have been upheld in many cases.
Constitutional Claims Require High Proof – Due process, Eighth Amendment, and religious liberty claims face a high legal threshold in workplace safety litigation.
🧠 Final Thoughts
The COVID-19 pandemic created complex legal challenges involving workplace safety, requiring courts to balance:
Public health
Statutory authority
Employee rights
Agency power
The judicial response reflects a strong preference for legal precision—emergency action must still follow the rule of law.
RELATED Blog
0 comments