Local self-government and administrative law
Local Self-Government and Administrative Law
What is Local Self-Government?
Local self-government refers to the decentralized governance system at the grassroots level, where local bodies such as Municipalities, Panchayats, and Urban Local Bodies manage local affairs.
It is based on the principle of subsidiarity, where local problems are handled by local institutions closest to the people.
In India, local self-government institutions are constitutionally recognized under Part IX (73rd Amendment) and Part IXA (74th Amendment) of the Constitution, which provide a constitutional status to Panchayats and Municipalities respectively.
Administrative Law and Local Self-Government
Local self-government bodies have statutory powers delegated by the state governments.
Their actions are governed by statutes, rules, and principles of administrative law, including natural justice, rule of law, reasonableness, and judicial review.
They perform quasi-legislative, quasi-judicial, and executive functions and their decisions can be challenged in courts.
Administrative law ensures accountability, transparency, and fairness in the functioning of local bodies.
Important Case Laws on Local Self-Government and Administrative Law
1. State of Rajasthan vs. Union of India (1977) — Panchayat Raj and Constitutional Status
Facts: The case dealt with the constitutional validity of Panchayati Raj institutions before the 73rd Amendment.
Judgment: The Supreme Court recognized the importance of local self-government but held that before the amendment, Panchayats were creatures of state legislature without constitutional protection.
Significance: This case led to the realization that local bodies needed constitutional backing, resulting in the 73rd and 74th Amendments.
Administrative Law Principle: Emphasizes that the powers and functions of local bodies are subject to state law but need constitutional protection for autonomy.
2. Balwant Singh vs. Union of India (1968)
Facts: This case concerned the administrative powers of local bodies and their control by state governments.
Judgment: The Supreme Court held that local bodies have no inherent sovereignty; their powers are delegated and can be controlled or superseded by state governments.
Significance: It clarified that local self-government is subordinate to the state, reinforcing administrative control.
Administrative Law Principle: Demonstrates the principle of delegated legislation and executive control over local authorities.
3. Praga Tools Corporation Ltd. vs. C.A. Iyer (1965)
Facts: This case examined the powers of municipalities in imposing taxes and levies.
Judgment: The Supreme Court ruled that municipalities can only exercise powers explicitly conferred by statute and must act within those limits.
Significance: It underlined the principle that local bodies cannot act ultra vires (beyond their legal powers).
Administrative Law Principle: Reinforces the rule of law and limits of delegated powers.
4. Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board vs. A. Rajappa (1978)
Facts: Though primarily a labor law case, it involved a local authority’s administrative function.
Judgment: The Supreme Court classified local bodies as “instrumentalities of the state”, subject to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Significance: This decision made it clear that actions of local self-government bodies are subject to judicial review.
Administrative Law Principle: Strengthened judicial oversight and accountability of local administrative bodies.
5. Krishna Rao vs. State of Mysore (1967)
Facts: Challenged the arbitrary dismissal of a local body elected council.
Judgment: The court held that the principles of natural justice apply to local bodies, and their decisions must be fair and non-arbitrary.
Significance: Affirmed the applicability of natural justice in local self-government decision-making.
Administrative Law Principle: Stressed on fair procedure and protection of democratic rights at the local level.
Summary
Local Self-Government is essential for grassroots democracy and decentralization.
Administrative law governs the functioning of local bodies ensuring their powers are exercised within legal bounds.
Courts have established that local bodies must follow principles of natural justice, rule of law, and fairness.
Local bodies are subject to state control but enjoy constitutional recognition and protection after the 73rd and 74th Amendments.
Judicial review acts as a check on arbitrary or illegal administrative action by local authorities.
0 comments