Florida insurance regulation by administrative order
🏛️ Overview: Florida Insurance Regulation by Administrative Order
🔹 Who Regulates Insurance in Florida?
The primary regulator of insurance in Florida is the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation (OIR), operating under the Department of Financial Services (DFS). The OIR regulates:
Insurance rates
Policy forms
Market conduct
Licensing and solvency of insurers
Enforcement via administrative orders
🔹 What Is an Administrative Order?
An administrative order is a formal directive issued by a regulatory agency (like the OIR) with the force of law, used to:
Approve or disapprove rates or policy forms
Impose fines or sanctions
Enforce compliance
Deny or revoke licenses
They can be contested under the Florida Administrative Procedure Act (APA), especially through Chapter 120, Florida Statutes.
⚖️ Key Florida Case Law Involving Insurance Regulation by Administrative Order
Below are six important Florida cases that interpret and shape how insurance regulations are enforced through administrative orders:
1. Florida Department of Insurance v. American Bankers Insurance Co.
Court: Florida First District Court of Appeal (1st DCA)
Year: 1986
Facts:
American Bankers challenged an administrative order issued by the Florida Department of Insurance disapproving their proposed rate increases.
Issue:
Did the Department provide adequate justification for disapproving the rates?
Held:
The court held that the administrative order was invalid because the Department failed to show substantial evidence that the proposed rates were excessive.
Importance:
Agencies must base administrative orders on competent, substantial evidence.
Protects insurers from arbitrary disapprovals of rate filings.
2. State Farm Florida Insurance Co. v. Office of Insurance Regulation
Court: Florida First DCA
Year: 2007
Facts:
State Farm challenged the OIR’s administrative order requiring it to lower property insurance rates under new legislation passed after the 2004–2005 hurricane seasons.
Issue:
Did the OIR properly follow statutory procedure in issuing the rate reduction order?
Held:
The court upheld the OIR's order, ruling that it followed proper procedure and relied on legislative directives.
Importance:
Confirms that administrative orders tied to legislative mandates are valid.
Supports the OIR’s authority to enforce statutory rate reductions in response to emergencies.
3. Office of Insurance Regulation v. Florida Association of Insurance Agents
Court: Florida First DCA
Year: 2006
Facts:
OIR issued an order allowing Citizens Property Insurance Corporation to write policies in certain zip codes, which some agents argued bypassed their market.
Issue:
Was the administrative order an unadopted rule?
Held:
The court held that the order constituted an unadopted rule, violating the APA because it had general applicability and should have gone through formal rulemaking.
Importance:
Agencies must follow rulemaking procedures if orders affect a broad class.
Prevents agencies from evading public notice and input via "orders" that are actually rules.
4. Florida Office of Insurance Regulation v. Life Insurance Council
Court: Florida First DCA
Year: 2010
Facts:
The OIR issued an administrative order mandating how insurers must disclose annuity contracts to seniors.
Issue:
Was the order properly issued, or was it an overreach?
Held:
The court ruled that while the intent was valid, the OIR must adopt such mandates through rulemaking, not through administrative orders alone.
Importance:
Reinforces limits on agency discretion in using orders instead of formal rules.
Encourages transparency and procedural compliance.
5. United Auto Insurance Co. v. Florida Office of Insurance Regulation
Court: Florida First DCA
Year: 2013
Facts:
United Auto contested an administrative order requiring them to adjust their PIP (Personal Injury Protection) rates under new legislation.
Issue:
Was the rate order lawful, given the changes in PIP laws?
Held:
The court found the order lawful, as it was consistent with the legislature’s directive to pass on cost savings from PIP reforms.
Importance:
Administrative orders can be used to enforce legislative reform in the insurance industry.
Confirms agencies' broad implementation power, when acting within statutory limits.
6. First Protective Insurance Co. v. Florida Office of Insurance Regulation
Court: Florida First DCA
Year: 2020
Facts:
First Protective challenged an OIR administrative order denying their proposed rate increase, arguing the OIR’s actuarial analysis was flawed.
Issue:
Was the denial order supported by substantial evidence?
Held:
The court sided with the insurer, holding the OIR failed to demonstrate that the proposed rates were excessive or that their own data was superior.
Importance:
Strengthens judicial oversight of technical justifications in administrative orders.
Agencies must adequately explain and support their decisions.
🔍 Key Legal Principles from the Cases
| Legal Principle | Explanation | Supporting Case(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Substantial Evidence Requirement | Agencies must base orders on credible, factual evidence. | American Bankers, First Protective |
| Legislative Compliance | Orders implementing statutory mandates are generally upheld. | State Farm, United Auto |
| Procedural Rulemaking Requirement | Orders with general applicability must go through rulemaking. | Insurance Agents, Life Insurance Council |
| Judicial Review Available | Administrative orders are subject to APA-based court review. | All listed cases |
| Technical Dispute Scrutiny | Courts will examine actuarial and economic justifications. | First Protective, American Bankers |
⚙️ Florida Statutes Governing Insurance Administrative Orders
Florida Statutes Chapter 120 – Administrative Procedure Act
Chapter 627 – Insurance Rates and Contracts
Section 624.307 – Powers of the OIR
Section 624.4211 – Administrative fines and penalties
Section 120.57 – Hearings and challenges to administrative action
🧾 Summary
Florida insurance regulation via administrative orders is:
Extensively used by the OIR to control rates, forms, and conduct.
Legally constrained by the APA and case law requiring fairness, transparency, and substantial evidence.
Enforceable unless challenged and overturned under APA provisions.
The key takeaway is that administrative orders are powerful but limited tools—they must align with law, be properly justified, and not serve as a workaround for formal rulemaking.
RELATED Blog
0 comments