Rights and duties of Finnish civil servants
✅ RIGHTS OF FINNISH CIVIL SERVANTS
Right to Fair Treatment
Civil servants must be treated equally and fairly in hiring, promotion, and disciplinary measures (Section 6 of the Constitution).
Right to Freedom of Speech and Political Activity
Civil servants enjoy constitutional rights such as freedom of expression and political activity, within limits consistent with their official duties.
Right to Employment Security
Permanent civil servants cannot be arbitrarily dismissed. Grounds for dismissal must be legal and proportionate.
Right to Good Administration
Civil servants have the right to receive clear guidance, fair procedures, and appeal mechanisms if decisions affect them negatively.
Right to Participate in Trade Union Activities
Civil servants may join trade unions and participate in collective bargaining.
Right to Leave and Social Benefits
Includes annual leave, parental leave, and sick leave, in line with national labor law.
⚖️ DUTIES OF FINNISH CIVIL SERVANTS
Duty of Loyalty
Must act loyally towards the employer (state) and uphold its interests in professional conduct.
Duty of Impartiality and Objectivity
Required to treat all individuals and matters equally, avoiding favoritism or discrimination.
Duty of Secrecy and Confidentiality
Civil servants must not disclose confidential information obtained through their official duties.
Duty of Competence and Diligence
Must perform their duties efficiently, lawfully, and with the necessary professional skill.
Duty to Avoid Conflicts of Interest
Must disclose any potential conflict between private interest and public duty.
Duty to Obey Lawful Orders
Obliged to comply with superiors’ lawful instructions unless they are manifestly illegal.
📚 CASE LAW EXAMPLES
Here are five key Finnish court cases that illustrate the application of civil servants' rights and duties in practice:
1. KHO 1999:51 – Termination Without Legal Grounds
Facts:
A civil servant was dismissed from his position based on alleged poor performance, without proper documentation or procedural steps.
Court's Finding:
The Supreme Administrative Court (Korkein hallinto-oikeus, KHO) ruled that the dismissal was unlawful, as there was no clear evidence of negligence or misconduct. The employer had not given the civil servant an opportunity to improve or respond.
Legal Principle:
Civil servants have the right to procedural fairness and cannot be dismissed without adequate legal grounds. Employment security is protected under the Civil Servants Act.
2. KHO 2001:28 – Duty of Loyalty and Public Criticism
Facts:
A senior civil servant publicly criticized the policies of the ministry where they worked, including internal memos and policy decisions.
Court's Finding:
The KHO held that while freedom of expression is constitutionally protected, the civil servant had breached their duty of loyalty by undermining public confidence in the institution.
Legal Principle:
Freedom of speech is limited by the duty of loyalty; civil servants must express criticisms constructively and internally, especially in sensitive positions.
3. KHO 2008:12 – Conflict of Interest in Procurement
Facts:
A civil servant was involved in procurement decisions while having financial ties to one of the bidding companies.
Court's Finding:
The court found that the official had violated conflict of interest rules, and the contract was annulled. The civil servant received disciplinary measures.
Legal Principle:
Civil servants must recuse themselves from decisions where personal interests may interfere. Objectivity and impartiality are core obligations.
4. KHO 2013:89 – Breach of Confidentiality
Facts:
An official at a social welfare office disclosed confidential client information to an unauthorized third party, claiming it was "in the public interest."
Court's Finding:
The KHO ruled that the official had violated the duty of confidentiality, even though they claimed to act in good faith.
Legal Principle:
The duty to maintain strict confidentiality is essential, especially in welfare, healthcare, and law enforcement roles. Unauthorized disclosure breaches both the Civil Servants Act and data protection laws.
5. KHO 2017:60 – Refusal to Follow Orders
Facts:
A civil servant refused to follow a superior’s instruction to implement a controversial policy change, arguing that it was ethically questionable.
Court's Finding:
The court held that while civil servants are entitled to raise ethical concerns, they are obliged to follow lawful orders unless the order is manifestly illegal. The policy was within legal bounds.
Legal Principle:
The duty to obey superiors applies unless there is a clear legal violation. Personal disagreement or ethical discomfort is not a sufficient reason to disobey lawful instructions.
Summary Table
| Right/Duty | Case | Key Legal Principle |
|---|---|---|
| Employment Protection | KHO 1999:51 | Unlawful dismissal without process violates employment rights |
| Loyalty vs Free Speech | KHO 2001:28 | Public criticism can breach loyalty duties |
| Impartiality & Conflict | KHO 2008:12 | Personal interests must not influence official decisions |
| Confidentiality | KHO 2013:89 | Disclosure of sensitive info violates civil service duties |
| Obedience to Lawful Orders | KHO 2017:60 | Orders must be followed unless clearly illegal |
Conclusion
Finnish civil servants enjoy robust legal protections and rights that support their role as neutral, skilled, and ethical public officials. However, these rights are balanced with strict professional duties that ensure the integrity of public administration. Case law from the Supreme Administrative Court (KHO) continuously defines and refines the balance between these rights and duties.
RELATED Blog
0 comments