Equality principle in administrative decision-making
Principle of Equality in Administrative Decision-Making
The principle of equality means that every individual should be treated fairly and impartially by administrative authorities. This principle is often tied to Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of the laws to all persons.
In the context of administrative decisions, this principle ensures that:
Similar cases are treated alike.
No individual or group is arbitrarily discriminated against.
Decisions are based on relevant, objective criteria rather than irrelevant or prejudicial considerations.
Key aspects of equality in administrative decision-making include:
Non-arbitrariness: Decisions must not be arbitrary or capricious.
Reasonableness: There must be a rational basis for differentiation.
Fair treatment: No unfair discrimination or favoritism.
Uniform application of law: Rules and policies must be applied consistently.
Important Case Laws on Equality Principle in Administrative Decision-Making
1. E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu, AIR 1974 SC 555
Summary:
This landmark case gave a broader and deeper meaning to Article 14. The Supreme Court held that equality is the antithesis of arbitrariness. Arbitrariness in State action violates Article 14.
Detailed Explanation:
Royappa’s case clarified that equality does not mean treating everyone identically but means absence of arbitrariness. The court held that the doctrine of equality is violated when administrative actions are made arbitrarily or without a reasonable basis.
Impact on Administrative Decisions:
Any administrative action that is arbitrary, unreasonable, or discriminatory violates the equality principle under Article 14.
2. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597
Summary:
Though primarily a case about the right to travel and procedural fairness, it reinforced the importance of non-arbitrariness and reasonableness in administrative decisions under Article 14.
Detailed Explanation:
The court ruled that administrative decisions affecting personal liberty must follow the principles of fairness and equality. The decision to impound Maneka Gandhi’s passport without sufficient cause was held to be arbitrary and violative of equality.
Relevance:
Administrative authorities must ensure their decisions are based on relevant factors and must not discriminate arbitrarily against any person.
3. Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India, AIR 1979 SC 1628
Summary:
This case concerned a tender process for a contract with a government authority.
Detailed Explanation:
The court held that even where the executive has discretion, it must be exercised fairly, reasonably, and non-arbitrarily. The authority must treat all bidders equally and cannot show favoritism or discrimination without valid reasons.
Impact:
Administrative decisions, especially those involving contractual opportunities, must adhere strictly to equality and fairness.
4. Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi, AIR 1981 SC 487
Summary:
This case involved the classification of institutions for recognition purposes by an administrative authority.
Detailed Explanation:
The court elaborated on the test for permissible classification under Article 14. It must be:
Based on an intelligible differentia.
The differentia must have a rational relation to the objective sought.
The principle of equality demands that such classification is not arbitrary or discriminatory.
Significance:
Administrative decisions involving classification or differentiation must be based on clear and rational criteria.
5. Indira Sawhney v. Union of India (Mandal Commission Case), AIR 1993 SC 477
Summary:
This landmark case addressed affirmative action but also reinforced the principle of equality by laying down limits on classification.
Detailed Explanation:
The court allowed classification for affirmative action but insisted that any classification must be reasonable and justifiable. It also reiterated that “equality” does not mean uniformity, but discrimination must not be arbitrary or excessive.
Impact:
Administrative decisions must balance equality with reasonable classification to serve social justice without violating equality.
Summary of the Cases and Their Contributions to Equality Principle in Administrative Decision-Making
| Case | Principle Established | Impact on Administrative Decision-making |
|---|---|---|
| E.P. Royappa | Equality = Absence of arbitrariness | Prohibits arbitrary decisions; mandates fairness and reason |
| Maneka Gandhi | Procedural fairness linked with equality | Administrative decisions affecting rights must be just and fair |
| Ramana Dayaram Shetty | Fairness in contractual and discretionary decisions | Equal treatment of all parties in administrative processes |
| Ajay Hasia | Valid classification test under Article 14 | Classifications must be rational and non-arbitrary |
| Indira Sawhney (Mandal) | Limits on classification for affirmative action | Reasonable and justifiable classifications allowed, no excessive discrimination |
Conclusion
The principle of equality in administrative decision-making protects citizens from unfair, arbitrary, or discriminatory actions by administrative authorities. The Supreme Court through various judgments has made it clear that equality means fair, rational, and consistent treatment. Administrative bodies must exercise their discretion reasonably and avoid any bias or favoritism.
RELATED Blog
0 comments