Comparative study of writ remedies in India, UK and USA
📜 Writ Remedies – Comparative Overview
| Feature | India | United Kingdom (UK) | United States (USA) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source of Writ Powers | Constitution of India (Articles 32 and 226) | Common law and statutes | U.S. Constitution (Article III) and Federal Statutes |
| Nature | Constitutional and fundamental right (Article 32) | Prerogative writs developed by common law courts | Judicial remedies, rooted in constitutional and statutory law |
| Writs Available | Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Certiorari, Prohibition, Quo Warranto | Same as India | Similar writs: Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Certiorari, Prohibition, plus Injunctive relief |
| Courts Empowered | Supreme Court (Art. 32), High Courts (Art. 226) | High Court (King's Bench Division), now evolved into judicial review | Federal and State Courts (District, Circuit, Supreme Court) |
| Scope | Very wide (public and quasi-public authorities) | Historically narrow but expanded through judicial review | Wide, especially in constitutional rights enforcement |
| Enforcement | Constitutional guarantee, especially under Article 32 | Discretionary remedy | Discretionary, guided by constitutional rights enforcement |
| Approach | Rights-based and protective | Rule of law, procedural fairness | Rights-based, especially via the Bill of Rights |
📚 Key Case Laws – Detailed Explanation
1. India: Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras (1950) SCR 594
Facts:
The State of Madras banned the circulation of a journal published by Romesh Thappar on grounds of public safety, without any judicial process.
Issue:
Was the ban a violation of the right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) and could the Supreme Court issue a writ under Article 32?
Held:
The Supreme Court held the ban unconstitutional and issued a writ striking it down. The Court emphasized that Article 32 is a fundamental right in itself and guarantees the right to constitutional remedies.
Significance:
This case established that writ jurisdiction under Article 32 is itself a fundamental right, and any violation of fundamental rights can be directly challenged in the Supreme Court.
2. UK: Ridge v. Baldwin (1964) AC 40
Facts:
A Chief Constable (Ridge) was dismissed without being given a chance to be heard by the disciplinary authority.
Issue:
Was the dismissal void for violating principles of natural justice, and could a writ of certiorari be issued?
Held:
The House of Lords quashed the decision, holding that failure to follow natural justice renders the decision void, and that writ of certiorari lies even against administrative authorities if they act in quasi-judicial capacity.
Significance:
This case marked a revival of natural justice in administrative law and extended the writ of certiorari to administrative as well as judicial bodies in the UK.
3. USA: Marbury v. Madison (1803) 5 U.S. 137
Facts:
William Marbury petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to issue a writ of mandamus directing the Secretary of State (James Madison) to deliver his judicial appointment.
Issue:
Whether the Supreme Court had the authority to issue such a writ under the Judiciary Act of 1789.
Held:
The Supreme Court held that while Marbury had a right, the Court lacked jurisdiction because the provision in the Judiciary Act granting that jurisdiction was unconstitutional.
Significance:
Though certiorari or mandamus was not issued, this case established judicial review in the USA. It remains the cornerstone of constitutional enforcement in American law.
4. India: Smt. Nilabati Behera v. State of Orissa (1993) 2 SCC 746
Facts:
A young boy died in police custody. His mother approached the Supreme Court under Article 32 for compensation and action against the police.
Issue:
Could a writ of habeas corpus and mandamus be issued for compensation and enforcement of right to life?
Held:
The Supreme Court awarded compensation and held that the right to life under Article 21 was violated. The Court issued writs to hold the police accountable and compensate the family.
Significance:
Expanded the scope of writ jurisdiction in India to include monetary compensation for violation of fundamental rights — something rarely seen in UK or USA courts at that time.
5. USA: Ex parte Milligan (1866) 71 U.S. 2
Facts:
During the American Civil War, Lambdin Milligan was arrested and tried by a military tribunal in Indiana, where civil courts were functioning.
Issue:
Could a writ of habeas corpus be used to challenge military detention of a civilian?
Held:
The U.S. Supreme Court held that military tribunals could not try civilians when civil courts are open. Milligan’s detention was declared illegal.
Significance:
Strengthened the use of habeas corpus as a constitutional remedy in the USA. It also enforced the limits of executive power during emergencies.
🧾 Comparative Insights from the Case Laws
| Country | Key Takeaways from Case Law |
|---|---|
| India | Writs under Articles 32 and 226 are constitutional rights; used both for enforcement and compensation (Nilabati Behera); broad and proactive approach |
| UK | Writs like certiorari and mandamus evolved through common law; focus is on procedural fairness and natural justice (Ridge v. Baldwin) |
| USA | Writs protect constitutional rights; grounded in judicial review (Marbury) and civil liberties (Ex parte Milligan); used to check executive overreach |
🧭 Conclusion
The writ jurisdiction in India, UK, and the USA plays a vital role in protecting individual rights and maintaining the rule of law. Though similar in origin (from English common law), each country has shaped its writ remedies differently:
India treats them as a guaranteed constitutional right, accessible against public authorities.
UK relies on judicial discretion and rule of law, where writs are now part of the broader judicial review mechanism.
USA uses writs like habeas corpus and mandamus within a constitutional framework primarily to protect individual liberty and enforce checks on government power.
Each system reflects a balance between liberty and legality, with courts as the final protectors of justice.
RELATED Blog
0 comments