Judgment Reviews Law at Nigeria
Nigeria's judicial review system serves as a critical mechanism to ensure that administrative actions by public authorities comply with the law, uphold individual rights, and maintain the rule of law. Here's an overview of how judicial review operates in Nigeria:
⚖️ Legal Framework for Judicial Review
The Constitution of Nigeria (1999, as amended) provides the foundation for judicial review
Section 6(1) vests judicial powers in the courts, including the authority to review executive and administrative actions.
Section 36(1) guarantees the right to a fair hearing, which courts interpret as encompassing the principles of natural justice in administrative proceedings.
These constitutional provisions empower Nigerian courts to scrutinize administrative decisions to ensure they are lawful and just.
🏛️ Judicial Review Mechanisms
Judicial review in Nigeria is primarily conducted through the followin
Federal High Court:Has jurisdiction over administrative matters, particularly those involving federal agencies
State High Courts:Handle administrative disputes at the state level
Court of Appeal:Reviews decisions from lower courts on administrative matters Applications for judicial review are typically initiated by filing for leave (permission) to apply, as stipulated in the Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2019
📝 Grounds for Judicial Review
Nigerian courts may grant judicial review on several ground:
Illegality When an administrative body acts beyond its legal authority (ultra vires
Procedural Impropriety Failure to follow prescribed procedures or principles of natural justic.
Irrationality When a decision is so unreasonable that no reasonable authority would have made i.
No Evidence When a decision is made without any evidence or with evidence that cannot reasonably support the decisio. These principles ensure that administrative actions are lawful, reasonable, and fai.
🧭 Practical Considerations
*Locus Standi: Applicants must demonstrate sufficient interest in the matter to bring a case. Nigerian courts have adopted a liberal approach to standing, allowing public-spirited individuals or organizations to seek judicial review in public interest mattes.
*Ouster Clauses: Some statutes attempt to limit judicial review by providing that certain decisions are final and not subject to court scrutiny. Nigerian courts have generally held such clauses to be unconstitutional if they infringe on the judiciary's power to review administrative actios.
*Ombudsman Role: The Public Complaints Commission (PCC) serves as an ombudsman, addressing grievances against public officials and agencies. While it does not have judicial authority, it plays a role in administrative accountabiliy
⚠️ Challenges and Limitation
Despite the robust legal framework, several challenges impede the effectiveness of judicial review in Nigera
*Ouster Clauses: Some laws attempt to exclude judicial review, though courts have declared such provisions unconstitutional in certain cass.
*Executive Interference: Political influence and interference in judicial appointments and decisions can undermine the independence of the judiciay.
*Resource Constraints: Limited financial and human resources affect the capacity of courts to handle administrative cases efficienty.
*Public Awareness: Lack of awareness among the public about their rights and the availability of judicial review mechaniss.
🧾 Recent Developmens
In a notable case, the Court of Appeal ruled that under the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act, an applicant does not need to seek prior leave before filing for judicial review. This decision emphasizes the primacy of statutory provisions over procedural rules in facilitating access to public informaton.
RELATED Blog
0 comments