Doctrine of Lis Pendens
Doctrine of Lis Pendens
1. Meaning and Origin
Lis Pendens is a Latin term meaning "a suit pending."
The doctrine refers to a legal principle that when a civil suit involving a particular property is pending between parties, no transfer or dealing with that property by the parties can affect the rights of the parties in the suit.
Essentially, it means “pending litigation” affecting the property’s status.
2. Purpose of the Doctrine
To prevent fraudulent transfer or dealings with property that is the subject matter of litigation.
To protect the interest of parties in an ongoing suit.
To avoid multiple suits or conflicting judgments on the same property.
To maintain status quo regarding the property until the dispute is resolved.
3. Legal Provision in India
The doctrine is codified under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
Section 52 states:
"A transfer of immovable property, made by any party to litigation concerning such property, during the pendency thereof, is subject to the outcome of the suit. Such transfer shall not affect the rights of the opposite party."
4. Key Features
Property in question must be immovable property.
A suit or proceeding must be pending involving the property.
The suit must be between the same parties or their representatives.
Any transfer of the property during litigation is subject to the final decision of the court.
The transfer is not invalid per se, but the transferee takes the property subject to the outcome.
5. Illustrative Example
Suppose A and B are disputing ownership of a house.
A files a suit against B for possession.
During the pendency of the suit, B sells the house to C.
Under the doctrine of lis pendens, the sale to C is subject to the result of the suit between A and B.
If A wins, C cannot claim ownership free of A’s rights.
6. Important Case Laws
Case 1: Ram Kishan Lal v. Krishna Singh AIR 1953 SC 292
The Supreme Court held that the doctrine of lis pendens applies to immovable property and the rights of the parties in the suit.
Any transfer by a party during the pendency of a suit cannot override the court’s decision.
The transfer is subject to the result of the litigation.
Case 2: Shiv Lal Agarwala v. Union of India AIR 1963 SC 1280
The Court explained the scope of Section 52 and held that it applies to all transfers of immovable property during litigation.
The doctrine protects the interest of parties but does not invalidate the transfer itself.
Case 3: Ramlal v. Phoolchand AIR 1954 SC 549
It was clarified that the doctrine applies only to immovable property and not movable property.
The pending suit must concern the ownership or possession of the property.
7. Exceptions and Limitations
The doctrine does not apply to movable property.
If the transfer is made to a bona fide purchaser for value without notice of the suit, the transferee may have protection.
The doctrine is limited to the parties involved in the litigation or their representatives.
If the suit is dismissed or withdrawn, the transfer is no longer subject to lis pendens.
8. Practical Implications
Protects the rights of parties in a dispute.
Prevents fraudulent sale or transfer to evade litigation.
Assists courts in delivering effective and final relief without multiplicity of suits.
Transfers made during litigation cannot create new rights adverse to the plaintiff.
9. Summary Table
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Doctrine | Lis Pendens (Pending Suit) |
| Legal Provision | Section 52, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 |
| Applies To | Immovable property |
| Purpose | Protect rights during pending litigation |
| Effect of Transfer | Transfer subject to suit outcome |
| Not Applicable To | Movable property, strangers not in suit |
| Key Cases | Ram Kishan Lal v. Krishna Singh, Shiv Lal Agarwala, Ramlal v. Phoolchand |
10. Conclusion
The Doctrine of Lis Pendens is a vital legal principle ensuring that the transfer of property during litigation does not prejudice the rights of the parties. It preserves the integrity of judicial proceedings by safeguarding the subject matter of litigation until final adjudication.
RELATED Blog
0 comments