Doctrine of Lis Pendens and Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act
Doctrine of Lis Pendens (Section 52, TPA)
1. Meaning / Concept
Lis pendens is a Latin term meaning “pending suit”.
Doctrine: If a property is the subject of an ongoing suit, any transfer of that property after the suit has begun is subject to the outcome of that suit.
Purpose: To protect the litigating party from losing the benefit of a decree due to fraudulent or subsequent transfers by the owner.
2. Statutory Provision
Section 52, TPA (1882):
"No transfer of immovable property, made by any person, after the institution of a suit or proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction concerning such property, shall affect the rights of the parties to such suit or proceeding."
Key points from the section:
Transfer must be of immovable property.
The suit must be already instituted in a competent court.
The transfer does not affect the rights of parties to the pending suit.
3. Essential Features
Property must be immovable.
Suit must be pending in a competent court.
Transfer made after institution of the suit is bound by the outcome.
The transferee takes the property subject to the rights of the plaintiff.
Protects pending litigations from being rendered useless by subsequent transfers.
4. Legal Effects
The transferee steps into the shoes of the transferor, but the property is liable to be affected by the decree in the pending suit.
Transferee’s interest is subordinate to the rights of the plaintiff in the pending suit.
Does not invalidate the transfer — the transferee still holds the property but is bound by the outcome.
5. Important Judicial Interpretations / Case Law
Gopala Krishna v. Lakshmi Ammal (Madras HC)
Held: Doctrine applies even if transferee is innocent, because the law intends to protect litigating rights over private transactions.
K.K. Verma v. Union of India (SC)
Reinforced: If property is transferred after suit filed, the plaintiff’s rights prevail; transferee cannot claim superiority over the plaintiff.
Smt. Anjamma v. Smt. Padmaja
Even when property is sold multiple times after suit institution, all subsequent transferees take subject to the decree.
6. Illustrations
A files a suit on 1st January claiming ownership of property X.
On 10th January, owner sells property X to B.
Result: B takes the property subject to A’s suit. If A wins, B must yield possession.
A files a suit for partition of property. The co-owner sells his share to C after the suit begins.
C cannot claim absolute rights over the share; he is bound by the court’s decree in the pending suit.
7. Exceptions / Limitations
Transfer before the suit → Section 52 does not apply.
Transfer unrelated to the subject matter of suit → Doctrine does not extend to unrelated property.
Transferee acts in good faith for value without notice?
Section 52 overrides all such claims; even innocent transferee is bound by the decree.
8. Purpose / Policy
Prevents fraudulent alienation of property to defeat pending litigation.
Protects litigant’s right and ensures justice.
Upholds certainty and stability in judicial proceedings.
9. Key Takeaways
Applies only to immovable property.
Transfer must occur after suit institution.
Rights of plaintiff in the pending suit prevail over transferee.
Doctrine applies even if transferee is innocent.
Sections 52 and 53 together protect pending litigation rights and parties in possession.
Summary Table (for quick exam recall)
| Feature | Doctrine of Lis Pendens (S.52) |
|---|---|
| Property | Immovable property only |
| Timing | Transfer must be after suit instituted |
| Effect on transferee | Takes subject to rights of plaintiff |
| Purpose | Protect rights of parties in pending litigation |
| Exceptions | Transfer before suit; unrelated property |
| Key Cases | Gopala Krishna v. Lakshmi Ammal, K.K. Verma v. Union of India, Smt. Anjamma v. Smt. Padmaja |
Conclusion:
The doctrine of lis pendens ensures that no transfer can defeat a pending legal claim. Under Section 52 TPA, even an innocent transferee is bound by the decree, making litigation effective and preventing fraudulent alienation of immovable property.
RELATED Blog
0 comments